[PR PATCH] New package: vimtex 2.4

[PR PATCH] New package: vimtex 2.4

[dkwo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1552 bytes --]

There is a new pull request by dkwo against master on the void-packages repository

https://github.com/dkwo/void-packages vimtex
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145

New package: vimtex 2.4
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->

#### General
- [x] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)

#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [x] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [ ] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR

<!--
If GitHub CI cannot be used to validate the build result (for example, if the
build is likely to take several hours), make sure to
[skip CI](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration).
When skipping CI, uncomment and fill out the following section.
Note: for builds that are likely to complete in less than 2 hours, it is not
acceptable to skip CI.
-->
<!-- 
#### Does it build and run successfully? 
(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  - [ ] aarch64-musl
  - [ ] armv7l
  - [ ] armv6l-musl
-->


A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145.patch is attached

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-vimtex-30145.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1115 bytes --]

From 0b76dc518f1edd5ea98b627566590dd129e3da64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolo <nicolopiazzalunga@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:42:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] New package: vimtex 2.4

---
 srcpkgs/vimtex/template | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 srcpkgs/vimtex/template

diff --git a/srcpkgs/vimtex/template b/srcpkgs/vimtex/template
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..132d3aa8783f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/srcpkgs/vimtex/template
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# Template file for 'vimtex'
+pkgname=vimtex
+version=2.4
+revision=1
+depends="vim-common"
+short_desc="Plugin for LaTeX files"
+maintainer="dkwo <nicolopiazzalunga@gmail.com>"
+license="MIT"
+homepage="https://github.com/lervag/vimtex"
+distfiles="${homepage}/archive/refs/tags/v${version}.tar.gz"
+checksum=04183d57b5753bb9530bacfcc610aaa9d487589db0ea62508c0107fff22e1856
+python_version=3
+
+do_install() {
+	vmkdir usr/share/vim/vimfiles
+	for dir in after autoload compiler doc ftdetect ftplugin indent media rplugin syntax; do
+		vcopy $dir usr/share/vim/vimfiles/$dir
+	done
+	vlicense LICENSE.md
+}

Re: New package: vimtex 2.4

[FollieHiyuki]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 244 bytes --]

New comment by FollieHiyuki on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145#issuecomment-817273407

Comment:
Isn't it more ideal to install this with `vim-plug`, or manually with built-in vim package system?

Re: New package: vimtex 2.4

[dkwo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 363 bytes --]

New comment by dkwo on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145#issuecomment-817292516

Comment:
Well, I'd like to use XBPS to manage it.

What worries me: what happens if there are other vim plugins that write to the folder /usr/share/vim/vimfiles, perhaps with similar or identical names to the ones this plugin writes?

Re: New package: vimtex 2.4

[FollieHiyuki]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 179 bytes --]

New comment by FollieHiyuki on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145#issuecomment-817304787

Comment:
It would probably be overwritten.

Re: New package: vimtex 2.4

[dkwo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 265 bytes --]

New comment by dkwo on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145#issuecomment-817585120

Comment:
What is the correct way to copy folders, such that if a folder already exists you just add to its content, without overwriting?

Re: New package: vimtex 2.4

[Chocimier]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 193 bytes --]

New comment by Chocimier on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145#issuecomment-817972872

Comment:
> Well, I'd like to use XBPS to manage it.

Why?

Re: New package: vimtex 2.4

[dkwo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 266 bytes --]

New comment by dkwo on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145#issuecomment-818040199

Comment:
For the same reason I manage other packages with the package manager: it's simpler to update, remove, keep track of files, etc.

Re: New package: vimtex 2.4

[Chocimier]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 615 bytes --]

New comment by Chocimier on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145#issuecomment-818046169

Comment:
Then sorry, but we are not going to maintain everyone's favourite text editor plugin. Use vundle or similar, they have updates.

> what happens if there are other vim plugins that write to the folder /usr/share/vim/vimfiles, perhaps with similar or identical names to the ones this plugin writes?

The same what happens for `/usr`: directories are merged, files are overwritten.

Note, that xbps expects to be only writer to `/usr` - with exception of `/usr/local`. 

Re: [PR PATCH] [Closed]: New package: vimtex 2.4

[Chocimier]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1408 bytes --]

There's a closed pull request on the void-packages repository

New package: vimtex 2.4
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30145

Description:
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->

#### General
- [x] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)

#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [x] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [ ] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR

<!--
If GitHub CI cannot be used to validate the build result (for example, if the
build is likely to take several hours), make sure to
[skip CI](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration).
When skipping CI, uncomment and fill out the following section.
Note: for builds that are likely to complete in less than 2 hours, it is not
acceptable to skip CI.
-->
<!-- 
#### Does it build and run successfully? 
(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  - [ ] aarch64-musl
  - [ ] armv7l
  - [ ] armv6l-musl
-->