[PR PATCH] dutree: update to 0.2.17.

[PR PATCH] dutree: update to 0.2.17.

[mobinmob]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1588 bytes --]

There is a new pull request by mobinmob against master on the void-packages repository

https://github.com/mobinmob/void-packages dutree
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30168

dutree: update to 0.2.17.
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->

#### General
- [ ] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)

#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [ ] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [X] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR

<!--
If GitHub CI cannot be used to validate the build result (for example, if the
build is likely to take several hours), make sure to
[skip CI](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration).
When skipping CI, uncomment and fill out the following section.
Note: for builds that are likely to complete in less than 2 hours, it is not
acceptable to skip CI.
-->
<!-- 
#### Does it build and run successfully? 
(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  - [ ] aarch64-musl
  - [ ] armv7l
  - [ ] armv6l-musl
-->


A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30168.patch is attached

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-dutree-30168.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1064 bytes --]

From d419f350f4f2912b8e2169146b2cb09734d8d80d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mobinmob <mobinmob@disroot.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:44:52 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] dutree: update to 0.2.17.

---
 srcpkgs/dutree/template | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/srcpkgs/dutree/template b/srcpkgs/dutree/template
index 4bf082f3b7d5..70155936776a 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/dutree/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/dutree/template
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Template file for 'dutree'
 pkgname=dutree
-version=0.2.16
+version=0.2.17
 revision=1
 build_style=cargo
 short_desc="Tool to analyze file system usage written in Rust"
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ maintainer="Orphaned <orphan@voidlinux.org>"
 license="GPL-3.0-or-later"
 homepage="https://github.com/nachoparker/dutree"
 distfiles="https://github.com/nachoparker/dutree/archive/v${version}.tar.gz"
-checksum=288e52f897785a03cae48eac581faf7d3743d36152f152ba25b8847528bf0a5f
+checksum=c88f2328c4e6cf96a0222efbe2a5c6d2de8cd0de0ebf01deb1f5fe81b5f8518e
 
 pre_build() {
 	# default version too old for ppc musl systems

Re: [PR PATCH] [Closed]: dutree: update to 0.2.17.

[ahesford]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --]

There's a closed pull request on the void-packages repository

dutree: update to 0.2.17.
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30168

Description:
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->

#### General
- [ ] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)

#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [ ] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [X] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR

<!--
If GitHub CI cannot be used to validate the build result (for example, if the
build is likely to take several hours), make sure to
[skip CI](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration).
When skipping CI, uncomment and fill out the following section.
Note: for builds that are likely to complete in less than 2 hours, it is not
acceptable to skip CI.
-->
<!-- 
#### Does it build and run successfully? 
(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  - [ ] aarch64-musl
  - [ ] armv7l
  - [ ] armv6l-musl
-->