Github messages for voidlinux
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ISSUE] protobuf-c: binary disabled during cross-compiling
@ 2021-11-14 23:22 natrys
  2021-11-14 23:29 ` ericonr
  2021-11-14 23:30 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " Johnnynator
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: natrys @ 2021-11-14 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 983 bytes --]

New issue by natrys on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/34084

Description:
I was building a nocross package (postgis) on aarch64, where the build somewhat confusingly failed because a dependency (protobuf-c) was missing its binary.

It appears that building the compiler binary was disabled for cross-compilation in the template, with reasoning being:

```
# buildprocess calls compiler while building, disable it on cross build
build_options="protoc"
desc_option_protoc="Build protoc-c compiler"
if [ -z "$CROSS_BUILD" ]; then
	build_options_default="protoc"
fi
```

But I wonder if this is not a problem any more. To test, I have cross-compiled it with `protoc` option enabled on x86_64 host, and it seemed to build and then work fine on aarch64 target. Upstream issue tracker had resolved number of cross-compilation related issues since this, and I think this is expected to be fine now. Perhaps someone else can verify.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: protobuf-c: binary disabled during cross-compiling
  2021-11-14 23:22 [ISSUE] protobuf-c: binary disabled during cross-compiling natrys
@ 2021-11-14 23:29 ` ericonr
  2021-11-14 23:30 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " Johnnynator
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2021-11-14 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 246 bytes --]

New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/34084#issuecomment-968385706

Comment:
if it's working, should be fine to remove the build option and just always build it, imo.

@ahesford 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] protobuf-c: binary disabled during cross-compiling
  2021-11-14 23:22 [ISSUE] protobuf-c: binary disabled during cross-compiling natrys
  2021-11-14 23:29 ` ericonr
@ 2021-11-14 23:30 ` Johnnynator
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johnnynator @ 2021-11-14 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 986 bytes --]

Closed issue by natrys on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/34084

Description:
I was building a nocross package (postgis) on aarch64, where the build somewhat confusingly failed because a dependency (protobuf-c) was missing its binary.

It appears that building the compiler binary was disabled for cross-compilation in the template, with reasoning being:

```
# buildprocess calls compiler while building, disable it on cross build
build_options="protoc"
desc_option_protoc="Build protoc-c compiler"
if [ -z "$CROSS_BUILD" ]; then
	build_options_default="protoc"
fi
```

But I wonder if this is not a problem any more. To test, I have cross-compiled it with `protoc` option enabled on x86_64 host, and it seemed to build and then work fine on aarch64 target. Upstream issue tracker had resolved number of cross-compilation related issues since this, and I think this is expected to be fine now. Perhaps someone else can verify.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-14 23:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-14 23:22 [ISSUE] protobuf-c: binary disabled during cross-compiling natrys
2021-11-14 23:29 ` ericonr
2021-11-14 23:30 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " Johnnynator

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).