[ISSUE] Package request: lua52-luasocket / lua53-luasocket / lua54-luasocket

[ISSUE] Package request: lua52-luasocket / lua53-luasocket / lua54-luasocket

[Neustradamus]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 671 bytes --]

New issue by Neustradamus on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/38371

Description:
### Package name

luasocket / lua52-luasocket / lua53-luasocket / lua54-luasocket

### Package homepage

https://github.com/lunarmodules/luasocket

### Description

Can you add LuaSocket for Lua 5.2, 5.3, 5.4?
There is a very old for Lua 5.1.

LuaSocket 3.0.1 has been released (3.0.0 several years after 2.0.2):
- https://github.com/lunarmodules/luasocket/releases

Thanks in advance.

cc: @q66, @Chocimier, @uggedal.

### Does the requested package meet the quality requirements?

Required

### Is the requested package released?

Yes

Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] Package request: lua52-luasocket / lua53-luasocket / lua54-luasocket

[Chocimier]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 674 bytes --]

Closed issue by Neustradamus on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/38371

Description:
### Package name

luasocket / lua52-luasocket / lua53-luasocket / lua54-luasocket

### Package homepage

https://github.com/lunarmodules/luasocket

### Description

Can you add LuaSocket for Lua 5.2, 5.3, 5.4?
There is a very old for Lua 5.1.

LuaSocket 3.0.1 has been released (3.0.0 several years after 2.0.2):
- https://github.com/lunarmodules/luasocket/releases

Thanks in advance.

cc: @q66, @Chocimier, @uggedal.

### Does the requested package meet the quality requirements?

Required

### Is the requested package released?

Yes

Re: Package request: lua52-luasocket / lua53-luasocket / lua54-luasocket

[Chocimier]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 695 bytes --]

New comment by Chocimier on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/38371#issuecomment-1200164071

Comment:
Please stop, you are establishing record of entitlement towards Void maintainers, all being volunteers.

- asking us to update on #38369, despite issue form telling you to not: "Don't request an update of a package, [We have a script for that](https://alpha.de.repo.voidlinux.org/void-updates/void-updates.txt). However, a quality pull request may help."
- doing it within 2 hours from release by upstream 
- tagging dozen of uninterested people
- continuing spam despite polite rejection of your original issue

is not acceptable behavior.