[ISSUE] Package request:

[ISSUE] Package request:

[DirtyVoid]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 390 bytes --]

New issue by DirtyVoid on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41614

Description:
### Package name

Emscripten

### Package homepage

https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten

### Description

It compiles C and C++ code to wasm

### Does the requested package meet the package requirements?

System

### Is the requested package released?

Yes

Re: Package request: Emscripten

[tranzystorek-io]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 326 bytes --]

New comment by tranzystorek-io on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41614#issuecomment-1382612097

Comment:
According to https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/blob/main/docs/packaging.md#dependencies emscripten requires a "top-of-tree" build of LLVM which seems like a no-go

Re: Package request: Emscripten

[DirtyVoid]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 436 bytes --]

New comment by DirtyVoid on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41614#issuecomment-1382712380

Comment:
It seems like a cool project. when you say it seems like a no-go, it makes me think you are uncertain if it is a go or no go but to you it appears to be a no go. Arch, Ubuntu and others already have it but I will close the issue. You can open it later when you can be certain if it is a go.

Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] Package request: Emscripten

[DirtyVoid]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 393 bytes --]

Closed issue by DirtyVoid on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41614

Description:
### Package name

Emscripten

### Package homepage

https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten

### Description

It compiles C and C++ code to wasm

### Does the requested package meet the package requirements?

System

### Is the requested package released?

Yes

Re: Package request: Emscripten

[DirtyVoid]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 566 bytes --]

New comment by DirtyVoid on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41614#issuecomment-1382712380

Comment:
It seems like a cool project. when you say it seems like a no-go, it makes me think you are uncertain if it is a go or no go but to you it appears to be a no go. Arch, Ubuntu and others already have it but I will close the issue. You can open it later when you can be certain if it is a go. I am not very knowledgeable about packaging but LLVM is available on the repo, Can LLVM found in the repo not be a dependency? 

Re: Package request: Emscripten

[DirtyVoid]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]

New comment by DirtyVoid on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41614#issuecomment-1382712380

Comment:
It seems like a cool project. when you say it seems like a no-go, it makes me think you are uncertain if it is a go or no go but to you it appears to be a no go. Arch and Ubuntu already have it but I will close the issue. You can open it later when you can be certain if it is a go. I am not very knowledgeable about packaging but LLVM is available on the repo, Can LLVM found in the repo not be a dependency? 

Re: Package request: Emscripten

[DirtyVoid]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 431 bytes --]

New comment by DirtyVoid on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41614#issuecomment-1382712380

Comment:
It seems like a cool project. when you say it seems like a no-go, it makes me think you are uncertain if it is a go or no go but to you it appears to be a no go. Arch and Ubuntu already have it but I will close the issue. You can open it later when you can be certain if it is a go. 

Re: Package request: Emscripten

[tranzystorek-io]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]

New comment by tranzystorek-io on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41614#issuecomment-1382719200

Comment:
@DirtyVoid I meant it's unlikely to be accepted (unless they start supporting stable), I don't think closing this request is necessary.

Especially with LLVM, we already have a fair bit of difficulty keeping the version fresh, so having to build potentially arbitrary revisions for each bump of emscripten doesn't seem sustainable.