* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
@ 2020-05-05 11:12 ` Duncaen
2020-05-05 16:44 ` sgn
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Duncaen @ 2020-05-05 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 391 bytes --]
New comment by Duncaen on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-623992969
Comment:
Yes scripts in `/etc/sv/` and `/etc/runit` should probably not be `conf_files` by default, especially if a user sets `keepconf=yes` in xbps.d, which will always create `.new-$version` files even if the previous configuration file was never changed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
2020-05-05 11:12 ` Duncaen
@ 2020-05-05 16:44 ` sgn
2020-05-16 14:02 ` Chocimier
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2020-05-05 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 267 bytes --]
New comment by sgn on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-624167464
Comment:
- Files provided by `grml-zsh-config`
- `/etc/bash/bashrc` (not sure about this one)
Those files shouldn't be marked as conf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
2020-05-05 11:12 ` Duncaen
2020-05-05 16:44 ` sgn
@ 2020-05-16 14:02 ` Chocimier
2020-05-18 7:12 ` Gottox
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Chocimier @ 2020-05-16 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 250 bytes --]
New comment by Chocimier on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-629650718
Comment:
Good idea.
Skimmed through xlocate, nothing besides what Duncaen pointed seems to need to be excluded.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-16 14:02 ` Chocimier
@ 2020-05-18 7:12 ` Gottox
2020-05-18 7:13 ` Gottox
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Gottox @ 2020-05-18 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 174 bytes --]
New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-629990676
Comment:
basicly Debian for example does.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-18 7:12 ` Gottox
@ 2020-05-18 7:13 ` Gottox
2020-05-18 8:00 ` travankor
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Gottox @ 2020-05-18 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 216 bytes --]
New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-629991226
Comment:
I'll make a PR that addresses this issue and respects @Duncaen's comments.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-18 7:13 ` Gottox
@ 2020-05-18 8:00 ` travankor
2020-05-18 8:00 ` travankor
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: travankor @ 2020-05-18 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 180 bytes --]
New comment by travankor on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-630013536
Comment:
Should `/etc/sv/conf`count as conf?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-18 8:00 ` travankor
@ 2020-05-18 8:00 ` travankor
2020-07-11 5:06 ` ericonr
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: travankor @ 2020-05-18 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 188 bytes --]
New comment by travankor on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-630013536
Comment:
Should `/etc/sv/service/conf`count as conf?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-18 8:00 ` travankor
@ 2020-07-11 5:06 ` ericonr
2020-07-11 5:14 ` ericonr
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2020-07-11 5:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 697 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-656991120
Comment:
AppArmor profiles aren't conf files either. They are in `/etc/apparmor.d/`, but the local files in `/etc/apparmor.d/local/` are conf files.
@Duncaen what do you think about making `/etc/runit/ctrlaltdel` a `conf_file`? It is something that a user can change depending on the action they want to trigger when they use that keyboard shortcut.
> Should /etc/sv/service/confcount as conf?
@travankor IMO yes, it's where we recommend users make changes that persist across package updates. I believe the `vsv` function marks those as conf by default.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-11 5:06 ` ericonr
@ 2020-07-11 5:14 ` ericonr
2020-07-11 6:16 ` ericonr
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2020-07-11 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 916 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-656991120
Comment:
AppArmor profiles aren't conf files either. They are in `/etc/apparmor.d/`, but the local files in `/etc/apparmor.d/local/` are conf files.
@Duncaen what do you think about making `/etc/runit/ctrlaltdel` a `conf_file`? It is something that a user can change depending on the action they want to trigger when they use that keyboard shortcut.
> Should /etc/sv/service/confcount as conf?
@travankor IMO yes, it's where we recommend users make changes that persist across package updates. I believe the `vsv` function marks those as conf by default.
How would this work for new applications that for some reason store files in `/etc` that aren't config files? Will we have a new `no_conf_files` or `no_auto_conf_file` field, or have to add exceptions to the script?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-11 5:14 ` ericonr
@ 2020-07-11 6:16 ` ericonr
2021-01-21 18:00 ` ericonr
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2020-07-11 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1104 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-656991120
Comment:
AppArmor profiles aren't conf files either. They are in `/etc/apparmor.d/`, but the local files in `/etc/apparmor.d/local/` are conf files.
@Duncaen what do you think about making `/etc/runit/ctrlaltdel` a `conf_file`? It is something that a user can change depending on the action they want to trigger when they use that keyboard shortcut.
> Should /etc/sv/service/confcount as conf?
@travankor IMO yes, it's where we recommend users make changes that persist across package updates. I believe the `vsv` function marks those as conf by default.
How would this work for new applications that for some reason store files in `/etc` that aren't config files? Will we have a new `no_conf_files` or `no_auto_conf_file` field, or have to add exceptions to the script?
---
To keep track, stuff I can think of in `/etc/` that aren't conf:
- `kernel.d/`
- `os-release` ?
- some/most(?) of the stuff in `zfs/`
- `polkit-1/rules.d/50-default.rules`
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-11 6:16 ` ericonr
@ 2021-01-21 18:00 ` ericonr
2022-04-16 2:02 ` github-actions
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2021-01-21 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-764832073
Comment:
Ping?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-21 18:00 ` ericonr
@ 2022-04-16 2:02 ` github-actions
2022-07-16 2:13 ` github-actions
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2022-04-16 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]
New comment by github-actions[bot] on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-1100506700
Comment:
Issues become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this issue is still relevant bump it or assign it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-16 2:02 ` github-actions
@ 2022-07-16 2:13 ` github-actions
2022-10-15 2:16 ` github-actions
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2022-07-16 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]
New comment by github-actions[bot] on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-1186062358
Comment:
Issues become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this issue is still relevant bump it or assign it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-16 2:13 ` github-actions
@ 2022-10-15 2:16 ` github-actions
2023-01-14 1:55 ` github-actions
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2022-10-15 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]
New comment by github-actions[bot] on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-1279634326
Comment:
Issues become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this issue is still relevant bump it or assign it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-15 2:16 ` github-actions
@ 2023-01-14 1:55 ` github-actions
2023-01-28 1:59 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " github-actions
2023-01-30 18:47 ` Chocimier
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2023-01-14 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]
New comment by github-actions[bot] on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-1382630408
Comment:
Issues become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this issue is still relevant bump it or assign it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-14 1:55 ` github-actions
@ 2023-01-28 1:59 ` github-actions
2023-01-30 18:47 ` Chocimier
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2023-01-28 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]
Closed issue by Gottox on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649
Description:
What about marking any files in /etc automaticly as conf_files. are there any counter-examples where this would break anything?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Implicitly set conf_files
2020-05-05 11:02 [ISSUE] Implicitly set conf_files Gottox
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-28 1:59 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " github-actions
@ 2023-01-30 18:47 ` Chocimier
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Chocimier @ 2023-01-30 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 202 bytes --]
New comment by Chocimier on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/21649#issuecomment-1409153002
Comment:
Blocked on https://github.com/void-linux/xbps/issues/342
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread