* Re: [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded?
2023-02-17 20:00 [ISSUE] [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded? atweiden
@ 2023-02-17 21:06 ` paper42
2023-02-17 22:59 ` CameronNemo
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: paper42 @ 2023-02-17 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 332 bytes --]
New comment by paper42 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/42333#issuecomment-1435268177
Comment:
I think the pinebookpro-kernel maintainer (who is the most qualified to answer this) already explained it in this thread, am I wrong? https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/41062
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded?
2023-02-17 20:00 [ISSUE] [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded? atweiden
2023-02-17 21:06 ` paper42
@ 2023-02-17 22:59 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-17 23:02 ` CameronNemo
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: CameronNemo @ 2023-02-17 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 488 bytes --]
New comment by CameronNemo on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/42333#issuecomment-1435374061
Comment:
If others would like to weigh in, that would be appreciated.
Some previous discussion in the Void project about patches / deviating from upstream that generally applies:
* https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/5444#issuecomment-578611324
* https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41388#issuecomment-1369403398
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded?
2023-02-17 20:00 [ISSUE] [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded? atweiden
2023-02-17 21:06 ` paper42
2023-02-17 22:59 ` CameronNemo
@ 2023-02-17 23:02 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-18 2:05 ` sgn
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: CameronNemo @ 2023-02-17 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 569 bytes --]
New comment by CameronNemo on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/42333#issuecomment-1435374061
Comment:
If others would like to weigh in, that would be appreciated.
Some previous discussion in the Void project about patches / deviating from upstream that generally applies:
* https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/5444#issuecomment-578611324
* https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41388#issuecomment-1369403398
* https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/32823#issuecomment-914676964
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded?
2023-02-17 20:00 [ISSUE] [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded? atweiden
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-17 23:02 ` CameronNemo
@ 2023-02-18 2:05 ` sgn
2023-05-20 1:51 ` github-actions
2023-06-03 2:01 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " github-actions
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2023-02-18 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 281 bytes --]
New comment by sgn on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/42333#issuecomment-1435451450
Comment:
If Debian, postmarketOS can make generic kernel works on PBP, I think we should drop pinebookpro-kernel. Just as same as other modded kernel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded?
2023-02-17 20:00 [ISSUE] [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded? atweiden
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-18 2:05 ` sgn
@ 2023-05-20 1:51 ` github-actions
2023-06-03 2:01 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " github-actions
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2023-05-20 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]
New comment by github-actions[bot] on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/42333#issuecomment-1555421420
Comment:
Issues become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this issue is still relevant bump it or assign it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded?
2023-02-17 20:00 [ISSUE] [Discussion] Should the pinebookpro-kernel template be retired, or expanded? atweiden
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-20 1:51 ` github-actions
@ 2023-06-03 2:01 ` github-actions
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2023-06-03 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 820 bytes --]
Closed issue by atweiden on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/42333
Description:
@CameronNemo and I have been chatting about [pinebookpro-kernel](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/41062#issuecomment-1434123591). In summary:
- An argument could be made to retire the pinebookpro-kernel template
- An argument could be made to expand the pinebookpro-kernel template to include several of the more modern Pinebook Pro patches designed by Manjaro (the semi-official distribution of the Pinebook Pro)
- The latest Manjaro patches for Pinebook Pro have been ported to Arch Linux ARM at [SvenKiljan/archlinuxarm-pbp-packages](https://github.com/SvenKiljan/archlinuxarm-pbp-packages)
I’m interested in knowing what the Void community thinks of either option.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread