* Re: Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
@ 2023-03-25 9:15 ` paper42
2023-03-25 10:10 ` mhmdanas
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: paper42 @ 2023-03-25 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 200 bytes --]
New comment by paper42 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005#issuecomment-1483773162
Comment:
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/31557
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
2023-03-25 9:15 ` paper42
@ 2023-03-25 10:10 ` mhmdanas
2023-03-25 16:50 ` leo-arch
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mhmdanas @ 2023-03-25 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 409 bytes --]
New comment by mhmdanas on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005#issuecomment-1483785394
Comment:
That line doesn't seem to be present anymore in the latest code, but this is mentioned in https://github.com/leo-arch/clifm/wiki/Introduction#goals:
> Nonetheless, clifm works currently [...] not only on X86_64 architectures, but on i386 and ARM machines as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
2023-03-25 9:15 ` paper42
2023-03-25 10:10 ` mhmdanas
@ 2023-03-25 16:50 ` leo-arch
2023-03-25 16:55 ` leo-arch
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: leo-arch @ 2023-03-25 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 474 bytes --]
New comment by leo-arch on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005#issuecomment-1483868133
Comment:
Hi @paper42. Thanks for your quick reply!
> That line doesn't seem to be present anymore in the latest code
Yes, the OS/architecture restriction is gone
> Nonetheless, clifm works currently [...] not only on X86_64 architectures, but on i386 and ARM machines as well.
Do you need me to remove that line from the docs?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-25 16:50 ` leo-arch
@ 2023-03-25 16:55 ` leo-arch
2023-03-25 16:58 ` leo-arch
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: leo-arch @ 2023-03-25 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 728 bytes --]
New comment by leo-arch on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005#issuecomment-1483868133
Comment:
Hi @paper42. Thanks for your quick reply!
> That line doesn't seem to be present anymore in the latest code
Yes, the OS/architecture restriction is gone
> Nonetheless, clifm works currently [...] not only on X86_64 architectures, but on i386 and ARM machines as well.
Do you need me to remove that line from the docs?
EDIT: Done. That specific line was removed. There's still a reference to supported operating systems/architectures though in the [README](https://github.com/leo-arch/clifm), but it just refers to _tested_ platforms rather than to _working_ platforms.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-25 16:55 ` leo-arch
@ 2023-03-25 16:58 ` leo-arch
2023-03-25 16:59 ` leo-arch
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: leo-arch @ 2023-03-25 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 739 bytes --]
New comment by leo-arch on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005#issuecomment-1483868133
Comment:
Hi @paper42, @mhmdanas. Thanks for your quick reply!
> That line doesn't seem to be present anymore in the latest code
Yes, the OS/architecture restriction is gone
> Nonetheless, clifm works currently [...] not only on X86_64 architectures, but on i386 and ARM machines as well.
Do you need me to remove that line from the docs?
EDIT: Done. That specific line was removed. There's still a reference to supported operating systems/architectures though in the [README](https://github.com/leo-arch/clifm), but it just refers to _tested_ platforms rather than to _working_ platforms.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-25 16:58 ` leo-arch
@ 2023-03-25 16:59 ` leo-arch
2023-03-27 7:01 ` gmbeard
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: leo-arch @ 2023-03-25 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 747 bytes --]
New comment by leo-arch on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005#issuecomment-1483868133
Comment:
Hi @paper42, @mhmdanas. Thanks for your quick reply!
> That line doesn't seem to be present anymore in the latest code
Yes, the OS/architecture restriction is gone
> Nonetheless, clifm works currently [...] not only on X86_64 architectures, but on i386 and ARM machines as well.
Do you need me to remove that line from the docs?
EDIT: Done. That specific line was removed. There's still a reference to supported operating systems/architectures though in the [README](https://github.com/leo-arch/clifm#support), but it just refers to _tested_ platforms rather than to _working_ platforms.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-25 16:59 ` leo-arch
@ 2023-03-27 7:01 ` gmbeard
2023-03-27 7:42 ` classabbyamp
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gmbeard @ 2023-03-27 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]
New comment by gmbeard on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005#issuecomment-1484605974
Comment:
I've had a go at packaging this (#43045).
@leo-arch one observation, It looks like CHANGELOG maybe one version behind in the `v1.11` tag - <https://raw.githubusercontent.com/leo-arch/clifm/v1.11/CHANGELOG>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-27 7:01 ` gmbeard
@ 2023-03-27 7:42 ` classabbyamp
2023-03-27 10:00 ` leo-arch
2023-07-25 23:37 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " leo-arch
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: classabbyamp @ 2023-03-27 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 225 bytes --]
New comment by classabbyamp on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005#issuecomment-1484658087
Comment:
1.11 is in https://raw.githubusercontent.com/leo-arch/clifm/master/CHANGELOG
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-27 7:42 ` classabbyamp
@ 2023-03-27 10:00 ` leo-arch
2023-07-25 23:37 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " leo-arch
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: leo-arch @ 2023-03-27 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 308 bytes --]
New comment by leo-arch on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005#issuecomment-1484854887
Comment:
Thank you so much @gmbeard!
Yes, the CHANGELOG was accidentally left behind in this release, but as @classabbyamp observed, the up to date version is in master.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] Package request: clifm
2023-03-25 2:58 [ISSUE] Package request: clifm leo-arch
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-27 10:00 ` leo-arch
@ 2023-07-25 23:37 ` leo-arch
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: leo-arch @ 2023-07-25 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 914 bytes --]
Closed issue by leo-arch on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/43005
Description:
### Package name
clifm
### Package homepage
https://github.com/leo-arch/clifm
### Description
Unlike most terminal file managers out there, **clifm** replaces the ubiquitous TUI by a shell-like command line interface: all input and interaction is performed via commands.
It provides automatic files listing, files selection, bookmarks, tags, file filters, a zoxide-like directory jumper, directory and commands history, auto-cd and auto-open (via a built-in resource opener), bulk rename, shell commands execution, TAB completion (with deep FZF integration and file previews), fish-like autosuggestions, plugins, and a trash system, among other features.
### Does the requested package meet the package requirements?
System, Compiled
### Is the requested package released?
Yes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread