Github messages for voidlinux
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: GitMensch <GitMensch@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: Re: gnucobol: update to 3.2
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 22:03:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230817200350.0umkudKcRXhZdXodoFOvMVnP7YfsPpLuWhMIX_BX11o@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-45629@inbox.vuxu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1637 bytes --]

New comment by GitMensch on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/45629#issuecomment-1682901700

Comment:
Why is that auto-reconfigured? Apart from needing more tools (`automake gettext-devel-tools libtool` would not be necessary otherwise) this won't use the versions of the tools that were tested when doing the boostrap upstream, so there normally should be a good reason for that [some distros _always_ do that _for , but most don't].

There is a lot of output because of configure ending in "mixed" harding options.
I'd suggest to explicit configure with either `--enable-hardening` (obviously making the binary a bit slower) or `--disable-hardening` to fix that, or configure with explicit specifying `CFLAGS=-O -g`.

To ensure that the dependencies that are noted are indeed used it is useful to drop the "guessing" part in configure by making that explicit `--with-db --with-curses=ncursesw --with-json=json-c --with-xml2`.

So you may want to add something like `configure_args="--disable-hardening --with-db --with-curses=ncursesw --with-json=json-c --with-xml2"`

Note for `checkdepends`: only one of wget or curl is needed, the second one is preferred.
Currently only `make test` is run for the test (which uses an external testsuite, therefore those curl).

I'd suggest to do this with `make checkall` instead as this will first run the internal testsuite, then the external one.

The cross-builds fail during "install", it looks like this is happening during "vmove" but as I don't know what they do for whatever reason and if they should work, I cannot comment on those.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-17 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-17  2:50 [PR PATCH] " cinerea0
2023-08-17  3:17 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " cinerea0
2023-08-17  3:28 ` cinerea0
2023-08-17 20:03 ` GitMensch [this message]
2023-08-17 20:39 ` cinerea0
2023-08-17 20:42 ` GitMensch
2023-08-18  2:23 ` cinerea0
2023-08-18  3:10 ` cinerea0
2023-08-18  5:14 ` GitMensch
2023-08-22 23:24 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " cinerea0
2023-08-22 23:26 ` cinerea0
2023-08-23  5:12 ` GitMensch
2023-08-23  5:35 ` GitMensch
2023-08-23  7:00 ` GitMensch
2023-08-25  5:24 ` GitMensch
2023-08-26 18:02 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " cinerea0
2023-09-23 13:32 ` [PR PATCH] [Merged]: " Duncaen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230817200350.0umkudKcRXhZdXodoFOvMVnP7YfsPpLuWhMIX_BX11o@z \
    --to=gitmensch@users.noreply.github.com \
    --cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).