* [ISSUE] vivaldi: Not built from source
@ 2020-03-30 10:08 toluschr
2020-03-30 12:51 ` Johnnynator
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: toluschr @ 2020-03-30 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 815 bytes --]
New issue by toluschr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20460
Description:
### System
As far as I'm aware, the Vivaldi browser is open source and licensed under the BSD License.
https://vivaldi.com/source/
https://help.vivaldi.com/article/is-vivaldi-open-source/
The package in the repositories uses a binary instead of building from source. Is there a reason for this?
I saw that the versions of the binary and the source code don't match.
Is a new package (perhaps `vivaldi-source`) needed?
* xuname:
Void 5.5.13_1 x86_64 AuthenticAMD notuptodate rrrrmmnFFFFFFFFFFFFF
* package:
vivaldi
### Expected behavior
Vivaldi is available in the repositories.
### Actual behavior
Vivaldi is a restricted package and not built from source.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: vivaldi: Not built from source
2020-03-30 10:08 [ISSUE] vivaldi: Not built from source toluschr
@ 2020-03-30 12:51 ` Johnnynator
2020-03-30 13:55 ` toluschr
2020-03-30 13:55 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " toluschr
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johnnynator @ 2020-03-30 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 308 bytes --]
New comment by Johnnynator on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20460#issuecomment-605980032
Comment:
Building it from source would still require it to be restricted, except you wanna fork it, remove all branding, etc... Nobody here as any interest in doing this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: vivaldi: Not built from source
2020-03-30 10:08 [ISSUE] vivaldi: Not built from source toluschr
2020-03-30 12:51 ` Johnnynator
@ 2020-03-30 13:55 ` toluschr
2020-03-30 13:55 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " toluschr
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: toluschr @ 2020-03-30 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]
New comment by toluschr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20460#issuecomment-606014193
Comment:
Makes sense
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] vivaldi: Not built from source
2020-03-30 10:08 [ISSUE] vivaldi: Not built from source toluschr
2020-03-30 12:51 ` Johnnynator
2020-03-30 13:55 ` toluschr
@ 2020-03-30 13:55 ` toluschr
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: toluschr @ 2020-03-30 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 732 bytes --]
Closed issue by toluschr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20460
Description:
### System
As far as I'm aware, the Vivaldi browser is partly open source.
https://vivaldi.com/source/
The package in the repositories uses a binary instead of building from source. Is there a reason for this?
I saw that the versions of the binary and the source code don't match.
Is a new package (perhaps `vivaldi-source`) needed?
* xuname:
Void 5.5.13_1 x86_64 AuthenticAMD notuptodate rrrrmmnFFFFFFFFFFFFF
* package:
vivaldi
### Expected behavior
Vivaldi is available in the repositories.
### Actual behavior
Vivaldi is a restricted package and not built from source.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-30 13:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-30 10:08 [ISSUE] vivaldi: Not built from source toluschr
2020-03-30 12:51 ` Johnnynator
2020-03-30 13:55 ` toluschr
2020-03-30 13:55 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " toluschr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).