* [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend
@ 2020-04-09 7:20 keshto
2020-04-09 7:23 ` keshto
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: keshto @ 2020-04-09 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1468 bytes --]
New issue by keshto on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20780
Description:
<!-- Don't request update of package. We have a script for that. https://alpha.de.repo.voidlinux.org/void-updates/void-updates.txt . However, a quality pull request may help. -->
### System
* xuname:
*output of ``xuname`` (part of xtools)*
`Void 5.6.2_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel uptodate rFF`
* package:
*affected package(s) including the version*
```
elogind (243.4_2) [elogind-243.4_2]
libelogind (243.4_2) [libelogind-243.4_2]
acpid (2.0.32_1) [acpid-2.0.32_1]
```
### Expected behavior
Opening the laptop lid resumes the system
### Actual behavior
It wakes, but then suspends again almost instantly
### Steps to reproduce the behavior
There is a conflict between acpid and elogind. In /etc/acpi/handler.sh if we comment out the `zzz` things work as expected.
```
...
button/lid)
case "$3" in
close)
# suspend-to-ram
logger "LID closed, suspending..."
#zzz
;;
open) logger "LID opened" ;;
*) logger "ACPI action undefined (LID): $2";;
esac
;;
*)
...
```
It seems that elogind (guessing from dmesg messages) is suspending before `zzz` is called and then when the lid opens `zzz` gets executed resulting in the suspend.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend
2020-04-09 7:20 [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend keshto
@ 2020-04-09 7:23 ` keshto
2020-04-09 7:26 ` xtraeme
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: keshto @ 2020-04-09 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 165 bytes --]
New comment by keshto on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20780#issuecomment-611374138
Comment:
@xtraeme pinging you in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend
2020-04-09 7:20 [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend keshto
2020-04-09 7:23 ` keshto
@ 2020-04-09 7:26 ` xtraeme
2020-04-09 19:16 ` keshto
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-09 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 268 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20780#issuecomment-611375500
Comment:
There's no issue here, elogind provides the acpid functionality... you shouldn't have both services enabled at the same time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend
2020-04-09 7:20 [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend keshto
2020-04-09 7:23 ` keshto
2020-04-09 7:26 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-09 19:16 ` keshto
2020-04-09 22:01 ` keshto
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: keshto @ 2020-04-09 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 468 bytes --]
New comment by keshto on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20780#issuecomment-611706594
Comment:
Only had acpid enabled, but I guess elogind gets started by something else. Removing acpid and adding elogind does indeed fix the conflict, but now suspend takes a good 10+seconds after the lid is closed to kick in and I will debug that further. Maybe there should be a conflict warning in elogind if acpid is enabled/running?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend
2020-04-09 7:20 [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend keshto
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-09 19:16 ` keshto
@ 2020-04-09 22:01 ` keshto
2020-04-09 22:01 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " keshto
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: keshto @ 2020-04-09 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 270 bytes --]
New comment by keshto on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20780#issuecomment-611774035
Comment:
Closing as this is a documentation/user error/packaging request. Let me know if there is anything I can do to make this clearer.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend
2020-04-09 7:20 [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend keshto
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-09 22:01 ` keshto
@ 2020-04-09 22:01 ` keshto
2020-04-10 7:11 ` travankor
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: keshto @ 2020-04-09 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1471 bytes --]
Closed issue by keshto on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20780
Description:
<!-- Don't request update of package. We have a script for that. https://alpha.de.repo.voidlinux.org/void-updates/void-updates.txt . However, a quality pull request may help. -->
### System
* xuname:
*output of ``xuname`` (part of xtools)*
`Void 5.6.2_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel uptodate rFF`
* package:
*affected package(s) including the version*
```
elogind (243.4_2) [elogind-243.4_2]
libelogind (243.4_2) [libelogind-243.4_2]
acpid (2.0.32_1) [acpid-2.0.32_1]
```
### Expected behavior
Opening the laptop lid resumes the system
### Actual behavior
It wakes, but then suspends again almost instantly
### Steps to reproduce the behavior
There is a conflict between acpid and elogind. In /etc/acpi/handler.sh if we comment out the `zzz` things work as expected.
```
...
button/lid)
case "$3" in
close)
# suspend-to-ram
logger "LID closed, suspending..."
#zzz
;;
open) logger "LID opened" ;;
*) logger "ACPI action undefined (LID): $2";;
esac
;;
*)
...
```
It seems that elogind (guessing from dmesg messages) is suspending before `zzz` is called and then when the lid opens `zzz` gets executed resulting in the suspend.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend
2020-04-09 7:20 [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend keshto
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-09 22:01 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " keshto
@ 2020-04-10 7:11 ` travankor
2020-04-22 17:32 ` ericonr
2020-04-22 21:36 ` keshto
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: travankor @ 2020-04-10 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 285 bytes --]
New comment by travankor on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20780#issuecomment-611911347
Comment:
void-docs is the right place to open an issue... btw the long suspend time with logind affects all systemd distros if you do some searching.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend
2020-04-09 7:20 [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend keshto
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-10 7:11 ` travankor
@ 2020-04-22 17:32 ` ericonr
2020-04-22 21:36 ` keshto
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2020-04-22 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 264 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20780#issuecomment-617923204
Comment:
@travankor do you think this could be documented in the session management part?
@keshto can you open an issue for it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend
2020-04-09 7:20 [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend keshto
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-22 17:32 ` ericonr
@ 2020-04-22 21:36 ` keshto
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: keshto @ 2020-04-22 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 199 bytes --]
New comment by keshto on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20780#issuecomment-618053714
Comment:
@ericonr https://github.com/void-linux/void-docs/pull/210
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-22 21:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-09 7:20 [ISSUE] acpid and elogind don't play well with suspend keshto
2020-04-09 7:23 ` keshto
2020-04-09 7:26 ` xtraeme
2020-04-09 19:16 ` keshto
2020-04-09 22:01 ` keshto
2020-04-09 22:01 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " keshto
2020-04-10 7:11 ` travankor
2020-04-22 17:32 ` ericonr
2020-04-22 21:36 ` keshto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).