Github messages for voidlinux
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PR PATCH] gcc: remove crypt interceptor for sanitizers
@ 2023-12-27  8:31 oreo639
  2023-12-28  7:34 ` [PR PATCH] [Merged]: " sgn
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: oreo639 @ 2023-12-27  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1568 bytes --]

There is a new pull request by oreo639 against master on the void-packages repository

https://github.com/oreo639/void-packages gccsancrypt
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/47918

gcc: remove crypt interceptor for sanitizers
<!-- Uncomment relevant sections and delete options which are not applicable -->
[ci skip]
#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: **briefly**

This fixes compiling with glibc 2.38+. crypt.h was used for getting the size of `struct crypt_data` in the crypt interceptor. The interceptor has since been removed in LLVM and gcc upstreams. This just backports the patch for gcc 12.

Revbump since this changes the behavior of sanitizers.

<!--
#### New package
- This new package conforms to the [package requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#package-requirements): **YES**|**NO**
-->

<!-- Note: If the build is likely to take more than 2 hours, please add ci skip tag as described in
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration
and test at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build.
Ignore this section if this PR is not skipping CI.
-->
<!--
#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  - aarch64-musl
  - armv7l
  - armv6l-musl
-->


A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/47918.patch is attached

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-gccsancrypt-47918.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 7787 bytes --]

From ffbeb00a85da3a65a959764cd933014639753b66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: oreo639 <oreo6391@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 20:26:26 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] gcc: remove crypt interceptor for sanitizers

Fix build with glibc 2.38.
---
 ...ad833631486e337e541e692d9b4a1ca14edd.patch | 136 ++++++++++++++++++
 srcpkgs/gcc/template                          |   2 +-
 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 srcpkgs/gcc/patches/d7bead833631486e337e541e692d9b4a1ca14edd.patch

diff --git a/srcpkgs/gcc/patches/d7bead833631486e337e541e692d9b4a1ca14edd.patch b/srcpkgs/gcc/patches/d7bead833631486e337e541e692d9b4a1ca14edd.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..b7078600fb3a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/srcpkgs/gcc/patches/d7bead833631486e337e541e692d9b4a1ca14edd.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+From d7bead833631486e337e541e692d9b4a1ca14edd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me>
+Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 09:59:17 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] [sanitizer] Remove crypt and crypt_r interceptors
+
+From Florian Weimer's D144073
+
+> On GNU/Linux (glibc), the crypt and crypt_r functions are not part of the main shared object (libc.so.6), but libcrypt (with multiple possible sonames). The sanitizer libraries do not depend on libcrypt, so it can happen that during sanitizer library initialization, no real implementation will be found because the crypt, crypt_r functions are not present in the process image (yet). If its interceptors are called nevertheless, this results in a call through a null pointer when the sanitizer library attempts to forward the call to the real implementation.
+>
+> Many distributions have already switched to libxcrypt, a library that is separate from glibc and that can be build with sanitizers directly (avoiding the need for interceptors). This patch disables building the interceptor for glibc targets.
+
+Let's remove crypt and crypt_r interceptors (D68431) to fix issues with
+newer glibc.
+
+For older glibc, msan will not know that an uninstrumented crypt_r call
+initializes `data`, so there is a risk for false positives. However, with some
+codebase survey, I think crypt_r uses are very few and the call sites typically
+have a `memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));` anyway.
+
+Fix https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/1365
+Related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169432
+
+Reviewed By: #sanitizers, fweimer, thesamesam, vitalybuka
+
+Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149403
+---
+ .../sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc         | 37 -------------------
+ .../sanitizer_platform_interceptors.h         |  2 -
+ .../sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp       |  8 ----
+ .../sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h         |  1 -
+ .../TestCases/Linux/crypt_r.cpp               | 36 ------------------
+ .../TestCases/Posix/crypt.cpp                 | 32 ----------------
+ 6 files changed, 116 deletions(-)
+ delete mode 100644 compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/Linux/crypt_r.cpp
+ delete mode 100644 compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/Posix/crypt.cpp
+
+diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc
+index b30c91f06cfeb0..490a8b12d8b17d 100644
+--- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc
++++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc
+@@ -10086,41 +10086,6 @@ INTERCEPTOR(SSIZE_T, getrandom, void *buf, SIZE_T buflen, unsigned int flags) {
+ #define INIT_GETRANDOM
+ #endif
+ 
+-#if SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_CRYPT
+-INTERCEPTOR(char *, crypt, char *key, char *salt) {
+-  void *ctx;
+-  COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_ENTER(ctx, crypt, key, salt);
+-  COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_READ_RANGE(ctx, key, internal_strlen(key) + 1);
+-  COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_READ_RANGE(ctx, salt, internal_strlen(salt) + 1);
+-  char *res = REAL(crypt)(key, salt);
+-  if (res != nullptr)
+-    COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_INITIALIZE_RANGE(res, internal_strlen(res) + 1);
+-  return res;
+-}
+-#define INIT_CRYPT COMMON_INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(crypt);
+-#else
+-#define INIT_CRYPT
+-#endif
+-
+-#if SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_CRYPT_R
+-INTERCEPTOR(char *, crypt_r, char *key, char *salt, void *data) {
+-  void *ctx;
+-  COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_ENTER(ctx, crypt_r, key, salt, data);
+-  COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_READ_RANGE(ctx, key, internal_strlen(key) + 1);
+-  COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_READ_RANGE(ctx, salt, internal_strlen(salt) + 1);
+-  char *res = REAL(crypt_r)(key, salt, data);
+-  if (res != nullptr) {
+-    COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_WRITE_RANGE(ctx, data,
+-                                   __sanitizer::struct_crypt_data_sz);
+-    COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_INITIALIZE_RANGE(res, internal_strlen(res) + 1);
+-  }
+-  return res;
+-}
+-#define INIT_CRYPT_R COMMON_INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(crypt_r);
+-#else
+-#define INIT_CRYPT_R
+-#endif
+-
+ #if SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_GETENTROPY
+ INTERCEPTOR(int, getentropy, void *buf, SIZE_T buflen) {
+   void *ctx;
+@@ -10698,8 +10663,6 @@ static void InitializeCommonInterceptors() {
+   INIT_GETUSERSHELL;
+   INIT_SL_INIT;
+   INIT_GETRANDOM;
+-  INIT_CRYPT;
+-  INIT_CRYPT_R;
+   INIT_GETENTROPY;
+   INIT_QSORT;
+   INIT_QSORT_R;
+diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_interceptors.h b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_interceptors.h
+index eb39fabfd59839..c82ab5c2105621 100644
+--- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_interceptors.h
++++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_interceptors.h
+@@ -569,8 +569,6 @@
+ #define SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_FDEVNAME SI_FREEBSD
+ #define SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_GETUSERSHELL (SI_POSIX && !SI_ANDROID)
+ #define SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_SL_INIT (SI_FREEBSD || SI_NETBSD)
+-#define SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_CRYPT (SI_POSIX && !SI_ANDROID)
+-#define SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_CRYPT_R (SI_LINUX && !SI_ANDROID)
+ 
+ #define SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_GETRANDOM \
+   ((SI_LINUX && __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 25)) || SI_FREEBSD)
+diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp
+index a04eed7aa5a6e3..6d61d276d77e35 100644
+--- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp
++++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp
+@@ -154,7 +154,6 @@ typedef struct user_fpregs elf_fpregset_
+ #include <linux/serial.h>
+ #include <sys/msg.h>
+ #include <sys/ipc.h>
+-#include <crypt.h>
+ #endif  // SANITIZER_ANDROID
+ 
+ #include <link.h>
+@@ -254,7 +253,6 @@ namespace __sanitizer {
+   unsigned struct_ustat_sz = SIZEOF_STRUCT_USTAT;
+   unsigned struct_rlimit64_sz = sizeof(struct rlimit64);
+   unsigned struct_statvfs64_sz = sizeof(struct statvfs64);
+-  unsigned struct_crypt_data_sz = sizeof(struct crypt_data);
+ #endif // SANITIZER_LINUX && !SANITIZER_ANDROID
+ 
+ #if SANITIZER_LINUX && !SANITIZER_ANDROID
+diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h
+index e6f298c26e1fb6..58244c9944a03a 100644
+--- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h
++++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h
+@@ -309,7 +309,6 @@ extern unsigned struct_msqid_ds_sz;
+ extern unsigned struct_mq_attr_sz;
+ extern unsigned struct_timex_sz;
+ extern unsigned struct_statvfs_sz;
+-extern unsigned struct_crypt_data_sz;
+ #endif  // SANITIZER_LINUX && !SANITIZER_ANDROID
+ 
+ struct __sanitizer_iovec {
diff --git a/srcpkgs/gcc/template b/srcpkgs/gcc/template
index 34a3fa62d31b5..a8f6096042247 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/gcc/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/gcc/template
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 pkgname=gcc
 version=12.2.0
-revision=3
+revision=4
 _minorver="${version%.*}"
 _majorver="${_minorver%.*}"
 _gmp_version=6.2.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PR PATCH] [Merged]: gcc: remove crypt interceptor for sanitizers
  2023-12-27  8:31 [PR PATCH] gcc: remove crypt interceptor for sanitizers oreo639
@ 2023-12-28  7:34 ` sgn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2023-12-28  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1413 bytes --]

There's a merged pull request on the void-packages repository

gcc: remove crypt interceptor for sanitizers
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/47918

Description:
<!-- Uncomment relevant sections and delete options which are not applicable -->
[ci skip]
#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: **briefly**

This fixes compiling with glibc 2.38+. crypt.h was used for getting the size of `struct crypt_data` in the crypt interceptor. The interceptor has since been removed in LLVM and gcc upstreams. This just backports the patch for gcc 12.

Revbump since this changes the behavior of sanitizers.

<!--
#### New package
- This new package conforms to the [package requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#package-requirements): **YES**|**NO**
-->

<!-- Note: If the build is likely to take more than 2 hours, please add ci skip tag as described in
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration
and test at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build.
Ignore this section if this PR is not skipping CI.
-->
<!--
#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  - aarch64-musl
  - armv7l
  - armv6l-musl
-->


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-28  7:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-27  8:31 [PR PATCH] gcc: remove crypt interceptor for sanitizers oreo639
2023-12-28  7:34 ` [PR PATCH] [Merged]: " sgn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).