Github messages for voidlinux
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ISSUE] vte3 and SIXEL image support
@ 2024-05-06 20:11 paoloschi
  2024-05-06 22:25 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " sgn
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: paoloschi @ 2024-05-06 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 370 bytes --]

New issue by paoloschi on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/50220

Description:
```
/usr/bin/vte-2.91 --version
VTE Application 0.76.0 +BIDI +GNUTLS +ICU -SYSTEMD
```
Since **libsixel** is in the repository, would it be the case to have the **vte3** package compiled to support it or is it not desirable for some reason?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] vte3 and SIXEL image support
  2024-05-06 20:11 [ISSUE] vte3 and SIXEL image support paoloschi
@ 2024-05-06 22:25 ` sgn
  2024-05-06 22:25 ` sgn
  2024-05-06 22:26 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " sgn
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2024-05-06 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 373 bytes --]

Closed issue by paoloschi on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/50220

Description:
```
/usr/bin/vte-2.91 --version
VTE Application 0.76.0 +BIDI +GNUTLS +ICU -SYSTEMD
```
Since **libsixel** is in the repository, would it be the case to have the **vte3** package compiled to support it or is it not desirable for some reason?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: vte3 and SIXEL image support
  2024-05-06 20:11 [ISSUE] vte3 and SIXEL image support paoloschi
  2024-05-06 22:25 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " sgn
@ 2024-05-06 22:25 ` sgn
  2024-05-06 22:26 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " sgn
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2024-05-06 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 439 bytes --]

New comment by sgn on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/50220#issuecomment-2097032736

Comment:
SIXEL support was changed multiple time in vte3 and demned unstable by vte themselves https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/vte/-/issues/253,
They eventually removed sixel support in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/vte/-/commit/e264c6ed36c1a5ada131d5ee781645fff4ce9e78

So, no vte does NOT support sixel!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] vte3 and SIXEL image support
  2024-05-06 20:11 [ISSUE] vte3 and SIXEL image support paoloschi
  2024-05-06 22:25 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " sgn
  2024-05-06 22:25 ` sgn
@ 2024-05-06 22:26 ` sgn
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2024-05-06 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 373 bytes --]

Closed issue by paoloschi on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/50220

Description:
```
/usr/bin/vte-2.91 --version
VTE Application 0.76.0 +BIDI +GNUTLS +ICU -SYSTEMD
```
Since **libsixel** is in the repository, would it be the case to have the **vte3** package compiled to support it or is it not desirable for some reason?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-06 22:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-06 20:11 [ISSUE] vte3 and SIXEL image support paoloschi
2024-05-06 22:25 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " sgn
2024-05-06 22:25 ` sgn
2024-05-06 22:26 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " sgn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).