Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* wg-crypt-wg0 process
@ 2020-12-30  8:19 Fatih USTA
  2020-12-30  9:29 ` John Sager
  2020-12-30 12:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fatih USTA @ 2020-12-30  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: WireGuard mailing list

Hi

I'm playing wireguard with the namespace. I think I caught a litle problem.

If I delete netns directly, everything is removed, but wg-crypt-wg0 
process is still alive.

root      8127  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S<   07:26 0:00 
[wg-crypt-wg0]
root      8143  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S<   07:26 0:00 
[wg-crypt-wg0]
root      8449  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S<   07:26 0:00 
[wg-crypt-wg0]
root      8454  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S<   07:26 0:00 
[wg-crypt-wg0]

If I delete first wireguard interface from the netns, everthing works fine.

wg_version:        1.0.20201221
kernel_version:       3.16.85-1

#!/bin/bash

case $1 in
     remove)
         ip link del dev bridge0 || { echo "Please add first."; exit 1; }
         ip link del dev veth1
         ip link del dev veth2
         #ip netns exec ns1 ip link del dev wg0
         #ip netns exec ns2 ip link del dev wg0
         ip netns del ns1
         ip netns del ns2
         iptables -D FORWARD -i bridge0 -o bridge0 -j ACCEPT
         rm -f /tmp/private-ns1 /tmp/private-ns2 /tmp/public-ns1 
/tmp/public-ns2
     ;;
     add)
         ip link add name bridge0 type bridge || { echo "Please remove 
first."; exit 1; }
         ip link set dev bridge0 up

         ip netns add ns1
         ip netns add ns2
         ip link add name veth1 type veth peer name eth0 netns ns1
         ip link add name veth2 type veth peer name eth0 netns ns2
         ip link set dev veth1 up master bridge0
         ip link set dev veth2 up master bridge0

         ip netns exec ns1 ip link set dev lo up
         ip netns exec ns1 ip link set dev eth0 up
         ip netns exec ns1 ip addr add 10.150.150.1/24 dev eth0

         ip netns exec ns2 ip link set dev lo up
         ip netns exec ns2 ip link set dev eth0 up
         ip netns exec ns2 ip addr add 10.150.150.2/24 dev eth0

         ( umask 0077;
           wg genkey | \
           tee /tmp/private-ns1 | \
           wg pubkey > /tmp/public-ns1

           wg genkey | \
           tee /tmp/private-ns2 | \
           wg pubkey > /tmp/public-ns2
         )

         ip netns exec ns1 ip link add name wg0 type wireguard
         ip netns exec ns1 ip addr add 172.16.1.1/24 dev wg0

         ip netns exec ns2 ip link add name wg0 type wireguard
         ip netns exec ns2 ip addr add 172.16.1.2/24 dev wg0

         ip netns exec ns1 wg set wg0 private-key /tmp/private-ns1 
listen-port 51820
         ip netns exec ns1 ip link set wg0 up

         ip netns exec ns2 wg set wg0 private-key /tmp/private-ns2 
listen-port 51820
         ip netns exec ns2 ip link set wg0 up

         ip netns exec ns1 wg set wg0 peer "$(</tmp/public-ns2)" 
allowed-ips 172.16.1.0/24 endpoint 10.150.150.2:51820
         ip netns exec ns2 wg set wg0 peer "$(</tmp/public-ns1)" 
allowed-ips 172.16.1.0/24 endpoint 10.150.150.1:51820

         iptables -I FORWARD -i bridge0 -o bridge0 -j ACCEPT

         ip netns exec ns1 wg
         ip netns exec ns2 wg
         ip netns exec ns1 ping -i 0.3 -c 2 172.16.1.2 &>/dev/null && \
                           echo -e "\n\nWorked" || \
                           echo -e "\n\nFailed"
     ;;
     *)echo "$(basename $0) add|remove" ;;
esac


-- 
Fatih USTA


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: wg-crypt-wg0 process
  2020-12-30  8:19 wg-crypt-wg0 process Fatih USTA
@ 2020-12-30  9:29 ` John Sager
  2020-12-30 12:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Sager @ 2020-12-30  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wireguard

The posted script works for me, Xubuntu 20.04 kernel 5.4.0-38-generic 
x86_64. The first time I ran it, it deleted both [wg-crypt-wg0] instances 
but left one kworker process: [kworker/0:0-wg-crypt-wg0]. I then ran it 
again and no wg kernel processes were left.

regards,

John

On 30/12/2020 08:19, Fatih USTA wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I'm playing wireguard with the namespace. I think I caught a litle problem.
> 
> If I delete netns directly, everything is removed, but wg-crypt-wg0 process 
> is still alive.
> 
> root      8127  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S<   07:26 0:00 [wg-crypt-wg0]
> root      8143  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S<   07:26 0:00 [wg-crypt-wg0]
> root      8449  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S<   07:26 0:00 [wg-crypt-wg0]
> root      8454  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S<   07:26 0:00 [wg-crypt-wg0]
> 
> If I delete first wireguard interface from the netns, everthing works fine.
> 
> wg_version:        1.0.20201221
> kernel_version:       3.16.85-1
> 
> #!/bin/bash
> 
> case $1 in
>      remove)
>          ip link del dev bridge0 || { echo "Please add first."; exit 1; }
>          ip link del dev veth1
>          ip link del dev veth2
>          #ip netns exec ns1 ip link del dev wg0
>          #ip netns exec ns2 ip link del dev wg0
>          ip netns del ns1
>          ip netns del ns2
>          iptables -D FORWARD -i bridge0 -o bridge0 -j ACCEPT
>          rm -f /tmp/private-ns1 /tmp/private-ns2 /tmp/public-ns1 
> /tmp/public-ns2
>      ;;
>      add)
>          ip link add name bridge0 type bridge || { echo "Please remove 
> first."; exit 1; }
>          ip link set dev bridge0 up
> 
>          ip netns add ns1
>          ip netns add ns2
>          ip link add name veth1 type veth peer name eth0 netns ns1
>          ip link add name veth2 type veth peer name eth0 netns ns2
>          ip link set dev veth1 up master bridge0
>          ip link set dev veth2 up master bridge0
> 
>          ip netns exec ns1 ip link set dev lo up
>          ip netns exec ns1 ip link set dev eth0 up
>          ip netns exec ns1 ip addr add 10.150.150.1/24 dev eth0
> 
>          ip netns exec ns2 ip link set dev lo up
>          ip netns exec ns2 ip link set dev eth0 up
>          ip netns exec ns2 ip addr add 10.150.150.2/24 dev eth0
> 
>          ( umask 0077;
>            wg genkey | \
>            tee /tmp/private-ns1 | \
>            wg pubkey > /tmp/public-ns1
> 
>            wg genkey | \
>            tee /tmp/private-ns2 | \
>            wg pubkey > /tmp/public-ns2
>          )
> 
>          ip netns exec ns1 ip link add name wg0 type wireguard
>          ip netns exec ns1 ip addr add 172.16.1.1/24 dev wg0
> 
>          ip netns exec ns2 ip link add name wg0 type wireguard
>          ip netns exec ns2 ip addr add 172.16.1.2/24 dev wg0
> 
>          ip netns exec ns1 wg set wg0 private-key /tmp/private-ns1 
> listen-port 51820
>          ip netns exec ns1 ip link set wg0 up
> 
>          ip netns exec ns2 wg set wg0 private-key /tmp/private-ns2 
> listen-port 51820
>          ip netns exec ns2 ip link set wg0 up
> 
>          ip netns exec ns1 wg set wg0 peer "$(</tmp/public-ns2)" allowed-ips 
> 172.16.1.0/24 endpoint 10.150.150.2:51820
>          ip netns exec ns2 wg set wg0 peer "$(</tmp/public-ns1)" allowed-ips 
> 172.16.1.0/24 endpoint 10.150.150.1:51820
> 
>          iptables -I FORWARD -i bridge0 -o bridge0 -j ACCEPT
> 
>          ip netns exec ns1 wg
>          ip netns exec ns2 wg
>          ip netns exec ns1 ping -i 0.3 -c 2 172.16.1.2 &>/dev/null && \
>                            echo -e "\n\nWorked" || \
>                            echo -e "\n\nFailed"
>      ;;
>      *)echo "$(basename $0) add|remove" ;;
> esac
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: wg-crypt-wg0 process
  2020-12-30  8:19 wg-crypt-wg0 process Fatih USTA
  2020-12-30  9:29 ` John Sager
@ 2020-12-30 12:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  2020-12-31  5:47   ` Fatih USTA
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2020-12-30 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fatih USTA; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list, LKML

Hi Fatih,

Thanks for the report and the detailed test case. From what I can see,
this behavior presents itself both with the explicit ip link del and
without. When running with debugging enabled, I can see this in dmesg:

[558758.361056] wireguard: wg0: Keypair 244 destroyed for peer 21
[558758.546649] wireguard: wg0: Peer 21 (10.150.150.2:51820) destroyed
[558758.563317] wireguard: wg0: Interface destroyed
[558758.567803] wireguard: wg0: Keypair 243 destroyed for peer 22
[558758.733287] wireguard: wg0: Peer 22 (10.150.150.1:51820) destroyed
[558758.749991] wireguard: wg0: Interface destroyed

The fact that I see "Interface destroyed" for both interfaces means
that wg_destruct() is being called, which includes these calls:

        destroy_workqueue(wg->handshake_receive_wq);
        destroy_workqueue(wg->handshake_send_wq);
        destroy_workqueue(wg->packet_crypt_wq);

In doing so, the output of ps changes from:

$ ps aux|grep wg0
root      200479  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I    13:06   0:00
[kworker/0:2-wg-crypt-wg0]
root      201226  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I    13:08   0:00
[kworker/1:4-wg-crypt-wg0]
root      201476  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I<   13:11   0:00
[wg-crypt-wg0]
root      201484  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I<   13:11   0:00
[wg-crypt-wg0]

to:

$ ps aux|grep wg0
root      200479  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I    13:06   0:00
[kworker/0:2-wg-crypt-wg0]
root      201226  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I    13:08   0:00
[kworker/1:4-wg-crypt-wg0]

What I suspect is happening is that destroying the workqueue does not
actually destroy the kthreads that they were using, so that they can
be reused (and eventually relabeled) by other drivers. Looking at the
stack of those indicates this is probably the case:

$ cat /proc/200479/stack
[<0>] worker_thread+0xba/0x3c0
[<0>] kthread+0x114/0x130
[<0>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

So it's just hanging out there idle waiting to be scheduled by
something new. In fact, while I was writing this email, that worker
already seems to have been reclaimed by another driver:

$ cat /proc/200479/comm
kworker/0:2-events

Now it's called "events".

This is happening because the kthread isn't actually destroyed, and
task->comm is being hijacked. In proc_task_name we have:

        if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
               wq_worker_comm(tcomm, sizeof(tcomm), p);
       else
               __get_task_comm(tcomm, sizeof(tcomm), p);

That top condition holds for workqueue workers, and wq_worker_comm
winds up scnprintf'ing the current worker description in there:

                        /*
                        * ->desc tracks information (wq name or
                        * set_worker_desc()) for the latest execution.  If
                        * current, prepend '+', otherwise '-'.
                        */
                       if (worker->desc[0] != '\0') {
                               if (worker->current_work)
                                       scnprintf(buf + off, size - off, "+%s",
                                                 worker->desc);
                               else
                                       scnprintf(buf + off, size - off, "-%s",
                                                 worker->desc);

But worker->desc isn't set until process_one_work is called:

        /*
        * Record wq name for cmdline and debug reporting, may get
        * overridden through set_worker_desc().
        */
       strscpy(worker->desc, pwq->wq->name, WORKER_DESC_LEN);

And it's never unset after the work is done and it's waiting idle in
worker_thread for the scheduler to reschedule it and eventually call
process_one_work on a new work unit.

It would be easy to just null out that string after the work is done
with something like:

        worker->current_func(work);
        worker->desc[0] = '\0';

But I guess this has never sufficiently bothered anyone before. I
suppose I could submit a patch and see how it's received. But it also
looks like the scnprintf above in wq_worker_comm distinguishes these
cases anyway. If there's a + it means that the work is active and if
there's a - it means that it's an old leftover thread. So maybe this
is fine as-is?

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: wg-crypt-wg0 process
  2020-12-30 12:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2020-12-31  5:47   ` Fatih USTA
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fatih USTA @ 2020-12-31  5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason A. Donenfeld; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list, LKML

Hi Jason,

Thanks for the detailed research and explanation.That's ok for me.

Regards.

Fatih USTA

On 30.12.2020 15:39, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Fatih,
>
> Thanks for the report and the detailed test case. From what I can see,
> this behavior presents itself both with the explicit ip link del and
> without. When running with debugging enabled, I can see this in dmesg:
>
> [558758.361056] wireguard: wg0: Keypair 244 destroyed for peer 21
> [558758.546649] wireguard: wg0: Peer 21 (10.150.150.2:51820) destroyed
> [558758.563317] wireguard: wg0: Interface destroyed
> [558758.567803] wireguard: wg0: Keypair 243 destroyed for peer 22
> [558758.733287] wireguard: wg0: Peer 22 (10.150.150.1:51820) destroyed
> [558758.749991] wireguard: wg0: Interface destroyed
>
> The fact that I see "Interface destroyed" for both interfaces means
> that wg_destruct() is being called, which includes these calls:
>
>          destroy_workqueue(wg->handshake_receive_wq);
>          destroy_workqueue(wg->handshake_send_wq);
>          destroy_workqueue(wg->packet_crypt_wq);
>
> In doing so, the output of ps changes from:
>
> $ ps aux|grep wg0
> root      200479  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I    13:06   0:00
> [kworker/0:2-wg-crypt-wg0]
> root      201226  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I    13:08   0:00
> [kworker/1:4-wg-crypt-wg0]
> root      201476  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I<   13:11   0:00
> [wg-crypt-wg0]
> root      201484  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I<   13:11   0:00
> [wg-crypt-wg0]
>
> to:
>
> $ ps aux|grep wg0
> root      200479  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I    13:06   0:00
> [kworker/0:2-wg-crypt-wg0]
> root      201226  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        I    13:08   0:00
> [kworker/1:4-wg-crypt-wg0]
>
> What I suspect is happening is that destroying the workqueue does not
> actually destroy the kthreads that they were using, so that they can
> be reused (and eventually relabeled) by other drivers. Looking at the
> stack of those indicates this is probably the case:
>
> $ cat /proc/200479/stack
> [<0>] worker_thread+0xba/0x3c0
> [<0>] kthread+0x114/0x130
> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>
> So it's just hanging out there idle waiting to be scheduled by
> something new. In fact, while I was writing this email, that worker
> already seems to have been reclaimed by another driver:
>
> $ cat /proc/200479/comm
> kworker/0:2-events
>
> Now it's called "events".
>
> This is happening because the kthread isn't actually destroyed, and
> task->comm is being hijacked. In proc_task_name we have:
>
>          if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
>                 wq_worker_comm(tcomm, sizeof(tcomm), p);
>         else
>                 __get_task_comm(tcomm, sizeof(tcomm), p);
>
> That top condition holds for workqueue workers, and wq_worker_comm
> winds up scnprintf'ing the current worker description in there:
>
>                          /*
>                          * ->desc tracks information (wq name or
>                          * set_worker_desc()) for the latest execution.  If
>                          * current, prepend '+', otherwise '-'.
>                          */
>                         if (worker->desc[0] != '\0') {
>                                 if (worker->current_work)
>                                         scnprintf(buf + off, size - off, "+%s",
>                                                   worker->desc);
>                                 else
>                                         scnprintf(buf + off, size - off, "-%s",
>                                                   worker->desc);
>
> But worker->desc isn't set until process_one_work is called:
>
>          /*
>          * Record wq name for cmdline and debug reporting, may get
>          * overridden through set_worker_desc().
>          */
>         strscpy(worker->desc, pwq->wq->name, WORKER_DESC_LEN);
>
> And it's never unset after the work is done and it's waiting idle in
> worker_thread for the scheduler to reschedule it and eventually call
> process_one_work on a new work unit.
>
> It would be easy to just null out that string after the work is done
> with something like:
>
>          worker->current_func(work);
>          worker->desc[0] = '\0';
>
> But I guess this has never sufficiently bothered anyone before. I
> suppose I could submit a patch and see how it's received. But it also
> looks like the scnprintf above in wq_worker_comm distinguishes these
> cases anyway. If there's a + it means that the work is active and if
> there's a - it means that it's an old leftover thread. So maybe this
> is fine as-is?
>
> Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-31  5:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-30  8:19 wg-crypt-wg0 process Fatih USTA
2020-12-30  9:29 ` John Sager
2020-12-30 12:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-12-31  5:47   ` Fatih USTA

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).