Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: pageexec@freemail.hu
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: imer_setup() is not compatible with PaX's RAP
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:29:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9prMg_RuEUaO1XNy4Aj6MH3Cu=16kp=F_B-kKbSwO+qdQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A0A3587.25804.3AD10FF8@pageexec.freemail.hu>

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:15 AM, PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu> wrote:
> oh boy, can't disagree with ugly ;)

The goal is the highest possible density of filth.

>
> --- WireGuard-0.0.20171111.orig/src/compat/compat.h       2017-11-11 04:35:06.000000000 +0100
> +++ WireGuard-0.0.20171111/src/compat/compat.h    2017-11-13 23:21:17.967716768 +0100

I fixed things up here:
https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/commit/?id=df318d1f0526663a2d92439376379e32ebcfef1a

> the KERNEXEC block isn't needed as it was removing KERNEXEC's own define

Wait, but earlier you wrote:

> speaking of PaX support, you recently added some __ro_after_init wrapper
> to wireguard which breaks under KERNEXEC when it's used on ops structs
> (my __read_only has different semantics) so i have to revert it here but
> it'd be nicer if you didn't define it when KERNEXEC is active.

So what exactly should I be fixing? I think in that last patch I
forgot to redefine it to be empty. Would this do what you have in
mind:

#ifdef CONFIG_PAX_KERNEXEC
#include <linux/cache.h>
#undef __ro_after_init
#define __ro_after_init
#endif

Or is there something else?

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-14  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-11  8:09 Tom Li
2017-11-11  8:16 ` Tom Li
2017-11-12  2:50 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-11-12  3:13   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-11-13  1:39   ` PaX Team
2017-11-13 19:34     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-11-14  0:15       ` PaX Team
2017-11-14  9:29         ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2017-11-14 10:29           ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-11-14 11:12           ` PaX Team
2017-11-28 12:20             ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-11-28 12:32               ` PaX Team
2017-11-28 12:36                 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-11-28 12:50                   ` PaX Team

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHmME9prMg_RuEUaO1XNy4Aj6MH3Cu=16kp=F_B-kKbSwO+qdQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).