* What's the wireguard-tools
@ 2023-08-10 3:51 Hangbin Liu
2023-08-10 10:46 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hangbin Liu @ 2023-08-10 3:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason A. Donenfeld; +Cc: wireguard
Hi Jason,
I'm maintaining the RHEL wireguard-tools rpm. Recently, There is a request to
convert the license tag in the spec file to SPDX format[1]. The current License
tag in wireguard-tools spec file is GPLv2, which is the same with the COPYING
in upstream. But when I searched the src files, I found there are kinds of
license identifier. e.g. GPL-2.0, LGPL-2.1+, MIT, GPL-2.0 OR MIT, etc.
Do you know which one I should use at the end? Should we unify the src files?
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1
Thanks
Hangbin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: What's the wireguard-tools
2023-08-10 3:51 What's the wireguard-tools Hangbin Liu
@ 2023-08-10 10:46 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2023-08-11 1:53 ` Hangbin Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2023-08-10 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hangbin Liu; +Cc: wireguard
Hi Hangbin,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:51:35AM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I'm maintaining the RHEL wireguard-tools rpm. Recently, There is a request to
> convert the license tag in the spec file to SPDX format[1]. The current License
> tag in wireguard-tools spec file is GPLv2, which is the same with the COPYING
> in upstream. But when I searched the src files, I found there are kinds of
> license identifier. e.g. GPL-2.0, LGPL-2.1+, MIT, GPL-2.0 OR MIT, etc.
>
> Do you know which one I should use at the end? Should we unify the src files?
The license is GPL-2.0.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: What's the wireguard-tools
2023-08-10 10:46 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2023-08-11 1:53 ` Hangbin Liu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hangbin Liu @ 2023-08-11 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason A. Donenfeld; +Cc: wireguard
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 12:46:57PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Hangbin,
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:51:35AM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > I'm maintaining the RHEL wireguard-tools rpm. Recently, There is a request to
> > convert the license tag in the spec file to SPDX format[1]. The current License
> > tag in wireguard-tools spec file is GPLv2, which is the same with the COPYING
> > in upstream. But when I searched the src files, I found there are kinds of
> > license identifier. e.g. GPL-2.0, LGPL-2.1+, MIT, GPL-2.0 OR MIT, etc.
> >
> > Do you know which one I should use at the end? Should we unify the src files?
>
> The license is GPL-2.0.
Thanks for the confirmation.
Hangbin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-11 1:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-10 3:51 What's the wireguard-tools Hangbin Liu
2023-08-10 10:46 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2023-08-11 1:53 ` Hangbin Liu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).