IP which is not there but wg0 replies - ?

IP which is not there but wg0 replies - ?

[lejeczek]

Hi guys.

Purely accidentally I stumbled uppon:

-> $ ping 10.1.101
PING 10.1.101 (10.1.0.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.415 ms

-> $ ip a ls dev wg0
17: wg0: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 8920 qdisc 
noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
     link/none
     inet 10.1.0.99/24 scope global wg0
        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
peer:
14: wg0: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 8920 qdisc 
noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
     link/none
     inet 10.1.0.100/24 scope global wg0
        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

This a wg0's IP.
Someone could shed a bit more light on that - I'd imagine 
many will appreciate, I will.
I'm thinking - is my ipcalcing messed up..
many thanks, L.

Re: How to post to the mailling list? (Was: IP which is not there but wg0 replies - ?)

[lejeczek]

On 08/06/2023 11:47, Marek Küthe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would be interested to know how you managed to post something on the
> Mailling list? I have been trying to do this for several weeks, however
> my messages do not arrive. Do you have a special trick?
>
> I would appreciate an answer!
>
> Greetings
> Marek Küthe
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:30:26 +0200
> lejeczek <peljasz@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys.
>>
>> Purely accidentally I stumbled uppon:
>>
>> -> $ ping 10.1.101
>> PING 10.1.101 (10.1.0.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms
>> 64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.415 ms
>>
>> -> $ ip a ls dev wg0
>> 17: wg0: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 8920 qdisc
>> noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
>>       link/none
>>       inet 10.1.0.99/24 scope global wg0
>>          valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> peer:
>> 14: wg0: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 8920 qdisc
>> noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
>>       link/none
>>       inet 10.1.0.100/24 scope global wg0
>>          valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>
>> This a wg0's IP.
>> Someone could shed a bit more light on that - I'd imagine
>> many will appreciate, I will.
>> I'm thinking - is my ipcalcing messed up..
>> many thanks, L.
>>
>
Apparently the list (maintainers?) practice old & healthy 
habit - which placing replies below/at bottom also is -  to 
accept only "text" format for a message. (I presume for new 
message/thread)
Test that if you will. (Thunderbird works)
regards, L.

Re: How to post to the mailling list? (Was: IP which is not there but wg0 replies - ?)

[lejeczek]

On 08/06/2023 14:04, Marek Küthe wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 13:45:27 +0200
> lejeczek <peljasz@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 08/06/2023 11:47, Marek Küthe wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would be interested to know how you managed to post something on the
>>> Mailling list? I have been trying to do this for several weeks, however
>>> my messages do not arrive. Do you have a special trick?
>>>
>>> I would appreciate an answer!
>>>
>>> Greetings
>>> Marek Küthe
>>>
>>> On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:30:26 +0200
>>> lejeczek <peljasz@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Hi guys.
>>>>
>>>> Purely accidentally I stumbled uppon:
>>>>   
>>>> -> $ ping 10.1.101
>>>> PING 10.1.101 (10.1.0.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>>> 64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms
>>>> 64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.415 ms
>>>>   
>>>> -> $ ip a ls dev wg0
>>>> 17: wg0: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 8920 qdisc
>>>> noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
>>>>        link/none
>>>>        inet 10.1.0.99/24 scope global wg0
>>>>           valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>>> peer:
>>>> 14: wg0: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 8920 qdisc
>>>> noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
>>>>        link/none
>>>>        inet 10.1.0.100/24 scope global wg0
>>>>           valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>>>
>>>> This a wg0's IP.
>>>> Someone could shed a bit more light on that - I'd imagine
>>>> many will appreciate, I will.
>>>> I'm thinking - is my ipcalcing messed up..
>>>> many thanks, L.
>>>>   
>>>   
>> Apparently the list (maintainers?) practice old & healthy
>> habit - which placing replies below/at bottom also is -  to
>> accept only "text" format for a message. (I presume for new
>> message/thread)
>> Test that if you will. (Thunderbird works)
>> regards, L.
> Thanks, but I have a text-only mail client. So I don't think that's
> the reason why my posts are still pending. All HTML emails I receive are
> automatically converted for example.
>
>
Perhaps checking settings at - 
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard - is also 
worth checking.
Nothing else comes to mind - I've just double-checked: if I 
leave it to Thunderbird (default format is "automatic") then 
a "failure notice" bounces back to me, whereas "text" 
manually went in.