From: "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@gmail.com>
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: triviality regarding $# counts
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:11:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA=-s3wkzDzGEQE8uHARPRRjPzF0De3UbXam_xcLC=JJuzN1sQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a0b9ec3-4661-4386-9fbf-b3152a46001e@eastlink.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5144 bytes --]
There still seems to be some confusion, so I'm going to back up a bit.
Apologies in advance if I tell you something you already know.
Quotes are part of the shell syntax. They aren't part of the quoted value.
If you do this:
name='Ray'
then the value stored into the variable *name* is just 3 characters: *R*,
*a*, and *y*. There aren't any quotes anymore; they were just there long
enough to tell the shell that you want the characters in between them to be
taken literally. In this simple case, they aren't even needed; this has
exactly the same result:
name=Ray
It's important to keep the distinction in mind between the *values* you're
working with and the particular way you represent those values in the
*syntax* of the language.
Here's an example where the quotes are actually required:
multiline='hello,
there'
The above command is two physical lines of text, but only one shell
command, and that command is assigning one string value. The result is not
an array; it's a single, scalar parameter containing 12 characters, one of
which happens to be a newline: *h*, *e*, *l*, another* l*, *o*, a comma, a
newline, *t*, *h*, *e*, *r*, and finally another *e*. You can access all of
them with subscripts; *$multiline[1]* is *h*, *$multiline[2]* is *e*, etc.
The quotes, despite being required, are still not part of the value.
The ability to do this also highlights the fact that newline is just
another character. Just like a letter of the alphabet or a digit or a
punctuation mark, it's just a number, but in the context of text that
number is interpreted as a character. The number 65 means *A*, 44 means
comma, 48 means *0*, and 10 means newline. After the above assignment, the
newline may be found at *$multiline[7]*.
Here's another way of assigning exactly the same value to the same variable:
multiline=$'hello,\nthere'
Here we have a single-line command assigning a multiline value. The ANSI
quotes *$'*...*' *let us use the ANSI C escape sequence *\n* to mean a
newline. The result is the same: the value of *multline* is 12 characters
long, and *$multiline[7] *is a newline.
This assignment gets you something completely different:
oneline='hello,\nthere'
Now there is no newline character anywhere in the string. It's 13
characters long, not 12; *$oneline[7] *is not a newline but a backslash,
and *$oneline[8]* is an *n*.
After the above pair of assignments, you might be confused by the fact
that *echo
$multiline *and *echo $oneline* produce the same result, but that's because
*echo* is doing the same kind of translation of ANSI C escapes that the
shell does when you use *$'*...*'* quotes. If you turn that off by using *echo
-E*, then you'll get two different answers:
$ echo -E "$multiline"
hello,
there
$ echo -E "$oneline"
hello,\nthere
(I used double quotes above out of long habit; they're not strictly
necessary, especially not in zsh.)
A pair of quotes – of any variety, single, double, or ANSI – with nothing
between them represents the empty string. The empty string is nothing at
all; if you print it out by itself, it's the same as not even executing the
print command. Despite this, it is sometimes a useful thing to store in a
variable:
empty=''
After the above assignment, *$#empty* is 0. It literally contains nothing.
Again, you don't actually need the quotes; this also works:
empty=
Which reinforces the role of the quotes as syntax rather than value.
And again, an empty string is not an empty *line. *If, when you print out
the empty string, you do so with a command that adds a newline at the end,
the *output* will be an empty line, but it's the printing that makes it a
line. The value inside the variable has no line-ness.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 2:08 PM Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca> wrote:
> On 2024-04-13 10:27, Mark J. Reed wrote:
>
> Small followup I meant to type but didn't:
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 1:19 PM Mark J. Reed <markjreed@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> redline *'\nddd=( "${(@f)aaa}" ) ... it seems like a lot of trouble to
>> copy the array as it is.'*
>>
>>
>> That comment confuses me; you aren't copying the array as it is at all!
>> You've gone from *aaa, *which has one element, to *ddd *having 8
>> elements. That's a far cry from "copying as it is".
>>
> Ah, but Mark, I figured all that out by the bottom of the post. At that
> point I was still laboring under 'visual thinking' . I dare say I'm
> straightened out. I had thought that 'split on newlines' meant 'add \n's
> where needed to demarcate element boundaries'. It's actually sorta the
> opposite -- there is no demarcation character and \n's will in fact be
> removed. But I'm still not happy with the dollars. I had thought that "
> $'...' " was grammatical but we have " ' ' " -- meaning an empty line --
> without the leading dollar, so the closest thing I could pattern was that
> they replaced the newlines. If anyone on the planet can get it wrong,
> it's me.
>
>
>
--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 11239 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-13 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 0:56 Ray Andrews
2024-04-12 4:55 ` Lawrence Velázquez
2024-04-12 14:48 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-12 19:09 ` Bart Schaefer
2024-04-13 1:13 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-13 1:33 ` Mark J. Reed
2024-04-13 2:28 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-13 3:25 ` Lawrence Velázquez
2024-04-13 14:37 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-13 15:14 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-13 17:19 ` Mark J. Reed
2024-04-13 17:27 ` Mark J. Reed
2024-04-13 18:08 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-13 19:45 ` Bart Schaefer
2024-04-13 20:36 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-13 21:01 ` Bart Schaefer
2024-04-14 0:28 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-14 0:30 ` Lawrence Velázquez
2024-04-14 3:26 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-14 3:49 ` Lawrence Velázquez
2024-04-14 4:57 ` Bart Schaefer
2024-04-14 13:24 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-14 13:35 ` Roman Perepelitsa
2024-04-14 14:06 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-14 14:15 ` Roman Perepelitsa
2024-04-14 14:53 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-14 15:11 ` Mark J. Reed
2024-04-14 16:23 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-14 14:06 ` Mark J. Reed
2024-04-14 14:47 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-14 14:59 ` Mark J. Reed
2024-04-14 15:51 ` Bart Schaefer
2024-04-14 17:22 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-14 17:42 ` Mark J. Reed
2024-04-14 18:24 ` Bart Schaefer
2024-04-14 22:00 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-13 20:11 ` Mark J. Reed [this message]
2024-04-13 20:53 ` Bart Schaefer
2024-04-14 0:19 ` Ray Andrews
2024-04-13 1:35 ` Bart Schaefer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA=-s3wkzDzGEQE8uHARPRRjPzF0De3UbXam_xcLC=JJuzN1sQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=markjreed@gmail.com \
--cc=zsh-users@zsh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).