* if (()){}else{} documented?
@ 2021-04-20 14:40 david
2021-04-20 15:19 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-20 15:33 ` Lawrence Velázquez
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: david @ 2021-04-20 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-users
Hi
I have been in a world of pain playing around with compound control
structures
e.g. this only works as a single line (is that true?)
if (( $1 == 4 )) { echo good } else { echo bad }
just wondered where I could read up on this?
f(){if (($1==4)){echo ok} else {echo nok} }
or
joe(){ [[ $1 > 4 ]] && echo big || echo small }
or
fred(){ if [[ $1 =~ fred ]] { echo ok} else {echo nok} }
There seems to be some arbitrariness as to when spaces are required
zzapper
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-20 14:40 if (()){}else{} documented? david
@ 2021-04-20 15:19 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-20 15:28 ` Lawrence Velázquez
2021-04-21 8:46 ` zzapper
2021-04-20 15:33 ` Lawrence Velázquez
1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marc Chantreux @ 2021-04-20 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: david; +Cc: zsh-users
Hi David,
> e.g. this only works as a single line (is that true?)
> if (( $1 == 4 )) { echo good } else { echo bad }
i'm not sure what a "single line" is. the "else" keyword should
not appear at the very begin of an expression but all the rest is ok.
meaning those are correct
if (( $1 == 4 )) { echo good } else { echo bad }
if (( $1 == 4 )) {
echo good
} else {
echo bad
}
this is not
if (( $1 == 4 )) {
echo good
}
else {
echo bad
}
> just wondered where I could read up on this?
all the following examples works fine there. i'm even surprised about
this one
> joe(){ [[ $1 > 4 ]] && echo big || echo small }
this is a math expression so i would have written
joe(){ (( $1 > 4 )) && echo big || echo small }
regards
marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-20 15:19 ` Marc Chantreux
@ 2021-04-20 15:28 ` Lawrence Velázquez
2021-04-20 15:32 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-21 8:46 ` zzapper
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Lawrence Velázquez @ 2021-04-20 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Chantreux, david; +Cc: zsh-users
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021, at 11:19 AM, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> all the following examples works fine there. i'm even surprised about
> this one
>
> > joe(){ [[ $1 > 4 ]] && echo big || echo small }
>
> this is a math expression so i would have written
>
> joe(){ (( $1 > 4 )) && echo big || echo small }
You'd be right because the original version is wrong (unless OP
*wants* lexicographic comparison and just didn't say so).
% joe(){ [[ $1 > 4 ]] && echo big || echo small }
% joe 5
big
% joe 10
small
--
vq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-20 15:28 ` Lawrence Velázquez
@ 2021-04-20 15:32 ` Marc Chantreux
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marc Chantreux @ 2021-04-20 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lawrence Velázquez; +Cc: david, zsh-users
> You'd be right because the original version is wrong (unless OP
> *wants* lexicographic comparison and just didn't say so).
> % joe(){ [[ $1 > 4 ]] && echo big || echo small }
ohh ... indeed :)
thanks
marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-20 14:40 if (()){}else{} documented? david
2021-04-20 15:19 ` Marc Chantreux
@ 2021-04-20 15:33 ` Lawrence Velázquez
2021-04-21 9:16 ` zzapper
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Lawrence Velázquez @ 2021-04-20 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: david; +Cc: zsh-users
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021, at 10:40 AM, david wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been in a world of pain playing around with compound control
> structures
>
> e.g. this only works as a single line (is that true?)
>
> if (( $1 == 4 )) { echo good } else { echo bad }
>
> just wondered where I could read up on this?
The zshmisc(1) man page, section "ALTERNATE FORMS FOR COMPLEX
COMMANDS". It assumes familiarity with lists, so probably also
look at "SIMPLE COMMANDS & PIPELINES".
--
vq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-20 15:19 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-20 15:28 ` Lawrence Velázquez
@ 2021-04-21 8:46 ` zzapper
2021-04-21 10:41 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-21 13:57 ` Bart Schaefer
1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: zzapper @ 2021-04-21 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Chantreux, zsh-users
On 20/04/2021 16:19, Marc Chantreux wrote:
>
> not appear at the very begin of an expression but all the rest is ok.
>
> meaning those are correct
>
> if (( $1 == 4 )) { echo good } else { echo bad }
>
> if (( $1 == 4 )) {
> echo good
> } else {
> echo bad
> }
>
> this is not
>
> if (( $1 == 4 )) {
> echo good
> }
> else {
> echo bad
> }
This is very helpful & clarifies. I 'd forgotten that shells are more
strict in their response to 'white space' than programming languages .
While playing golf I've noticed that the 'else' clause is particularly
intolerant it needs '} else {'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-20 15:33 ` Lawrence Velázquez
@ 2021-04-21 9:16 ` zzapper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: zzapper @ 2021-04-21 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-users
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1939 bytes --]
On 20/04/2021 16:33, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> SIMPLE COMMANDS & PIPELINES
A /sublist/ is either a single pipeline, or a sequence of two or more
pipelines separated by ‘&&’ or ‘||’. If two pipelines are separated by
‘&&’, the second pipeline is executed only if the first succeeds
(returns a zero status). If two pipelines are separated by ‘||’, the
second is executed only if the first fails (returns a nonzero status).
Both operators have equal precedence and are left associative. The value
of the sublist is the value of the last pipeline executed. For example,
dmesg | grep panic && print yes
is a sublist consisting of two pipelines, the second just a simple
command which will be executed if and only if the grep command returns a
zero status. If it does not, the value of the sublist is that return
status, else it is the status returned by the print (almost certainly
zero).
A /list/ is a sequence of zero or more sublists, in which each sublist
is terminated by ‘;’, ‘&’, ‘&|’, ‘&!’, or a newline. This terminator may
optionally be omitted from the last sublist in the list when the list
appears as a complex command inside ‘(...)’ or ‘{...}’. When a sublist
is terminated by ‘;’ or newline, the shell waits for it to finish before
executing the next sublist. If a sublist is terminated by a ‘&’, ‘&|’,
or ‘&!’, the shell executes the last pipeline in it in the background,
and does not wait for it to finish (note the difference from other
shells which execute the whole sublist in the background). A
backgrounded pipeline returns a status of zero.
More generally, a list can be seen as a set of any shell commands
whatsoever, including the complex commands below; this is implied
wherever the word ‘list’ appears in later descriptions. For example, the
commands in a shell function form a special sort of list.
lv thanks will digest
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2929 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-21 8:46 ` zzapper
@ 2021-04-21 10:41 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-21 12:32 ` zzapper
2021-04-21 13:57 ` Bart Schaefer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marc Chantreux @ 2021-04-21 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zzapper; +Cc: zsh-users
> While playing golf I've noticed that the 'else' clause is particularly
> intolerant it needs '} else {'
'else' is not the problem: expressions are :) (problem of priority?)
this is ok
if {true} {echo ok} else {echo nope}
those are syntax errors
if{true} {echo ok} else {echo nope}
if {true}{echo ok} else {echo nope}
if {true} {echo ok} else{echo nope}
this does not echoes what you expected :)
if {true} {echo ok}else {echo nope}
regards
marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-21 10:41 ` Marc Chantreux
@ 2021-04-21 12:32 ` zzapper
2021-04-21 14:59 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-21 15:01 ` Marc Chantreux
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: zzapper @ 2021-04-21 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-users
On 21/04/2021 11:41, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> this does not echoes what you expected:)
>
> if {true} {echo ok}else {echo nope}
I'd come across this when I was tying myself up in knots it's quite
logical really when you think about it LOL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-21 8:46 ` zzapper
2021-04-21 10:41 ` Marc Chantreux
@ 2021-04-21 13:57 ` Bart Schaefer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 2021-04-21 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zzapper; +Cc: Zsh Users
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:46 AM zzapper <zsh@rayninfo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> While playing golf I've noticed that the 'else' clause is particularly
> intolerant it needs '} else {'
Actually it only needs "} else", the next statement can appear on a
new line. In fact the next statement doesn't even have to be enclosed
in braces.
I believe the only case where all three must be on the same line is
} always {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-21 12:32 ` zzapper
@ 2021-04-21 14:59 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-21 15:01 ` Marc Chantreux
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marc Chantreux @ 2021-04-21 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zzapper; +Cc: zsh-users
Le Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 01:32:00PM +0100, zzapper a écrit :
> On 21/04/2021 11:41, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> > this does not echoes what you expected:)
> > if {true} {echo ok}else {echo nope}
> I'd come across this when I was tying myself up in knots it's quite logical
> really when you think about it LOL
i don't think so :) i guess this behavior isn't intentional at the
begining but stay there because of retrocompatibility.
regards
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: if (()){}else{} documented?
2021-04-21 12:32 ` zzapper
2021-04-21 14:59 ` Marc Chantreux
@ 2021-04-21 15:01 ` Marc Chantreux
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marc Chantreux @ 2021-04-21 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zzapper; +Cc: zsh-users
Le Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 01:32:00PM +0100, zzapper a écrit :
>
> On 21/04/2021 11:41, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> > this does not echoes what you expected:)
> > if {true} {echo ok}else {echo nope}
> I'd come across this when I was tying myself up in knots it's quite logical
> really when you think about it LOL
i don't think so. i guess it is unintentional but kept that way for
compatibility reasons?
regards
marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-21 16:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-20 14:40 if (()){}else{} documented? david
2021-04-20 15:19 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-20 15:28 ` Lawrence Velázquez
2021-04-20 15:32 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-21 8:46 ` zzapper
2021-04-21 10:41 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-21 12:32 ` zzapper
2021-04-21 14:59 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-21 15:01 ` Marc Chantreux
2021-04-21 13:57 ` Bart Schaefer
2021-04-20 15:33 ` Lawrence Velázquez
2021-04-21 9:16 ` zzapper
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).