Bug in 2.6b14

Bug in 2.6b14

[Samuel Tardieu]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

The bug shows up when one doesn't use either NIS or NIS_PLUS.

  Sam
- -- 
"La cervelle des petits enfants, ca doit avoir comme un petit gout de noisette"
                                                       Charles Baudelaire

*** zle_tricky.c.orig   Mon Apr 15 13:12:28 1996
- --- zle_tricky.c        Mon Apr 15 13:13:13 1996
***************
*** 1681,1687 ****
      }
  #else  /* no NIS or NIS_PLUS */
      /* add all the usernames to the named directory table */
!     nameddirtab->filltable();
  #endif
  
      scanhashtable(nameddirtab, 0, (addwhat==-1) ? 0 : ND_USERNAME, 0,
- --- 1681,1687 ----
      }
  #else  /* no NIS or NIS_PLUS */
      /* add all the usernames to the named directory table */
!     nameddirtab->filltable(nameddirtab);
  #endif
  
      scanhashtable(nameddirtab, 0, (addwhat==-1) ? 0 : ND_USERNAME, 0,


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAgUBMXIv+4FdzKExeYBpAQGs0wP+M3Yz/+4AM0ZmW5tUvbv51CqYVW48UlR/
ubm0vPXPt6IlgPS06TM1tBIdBl9PKAtrNYa7XXC9sDvkiyISk6Z+OPvXisS+N+5f
e2X2CcTiyujvD+oLSkXRkh/2a1KDzCHClN9xQzM7dyO2tWX343FILPASpZDiA3ba
ycW01eLjXhA=
=ZpgY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Bug in 2.6b14

[mason]

Samuel Tardieu wrote:
:The bug shows up when one doesn't use either NIS or NIS_PLUS.

Changed line 1684 in zle_tricky.c 
:!     nameddirtab->filltable();
to
:!     nameddirtab->filltable(nameddirtab);

Are there any future plans for fillnameddirtable() to use the argument
it's currently given?  Perhaps, fillnameddirtable() in hashtable.c should
be changed instead of the zle_tricky.c line.
-- 
Mason [G.C.W]  mason@werple.mira.net.au    "Hurt...Agony...Pain...LOVE-IT"