zsh-workers
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Oddity when completing option arguments after command arguments
@ 2017-12-18 12:01 Marko Myllynen
  2017-12-20  4:52 ` dana
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marko Myllynen @ 2017-12-18 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zsh-workers

Hi,

While working on some Zsh completions I happened to notice the following
when using this kind of completion (extracted ~minimal example follows):

#compdef foo

_foo () {
  local curcontext="$curcontext" state line expl ret=1
  declare -A opt_args

  case $service in
  foo)
    _arguments -C -S -s \
      "(- *)"{-h,--help}'[show help]' \
      "(-h --help)"\*{-F+,--filename}'[specify filename]:file:_files' \
      '*:host:_hosts' \
      && return 0
  ;;
  esac

  return ret
}

_foo "$@"

These work as expected:

$ foo -F <TAB>                   - getting filenames
$ foo -F<TAB>                    - getting filenames
$ foo <TAB>                      - getting hostnames
$ foo localhost --filename <TAB> - getting filenames
$ foo localhost -F<TAB>          - getting filenames

But here's the unexpected case:

$ foo localhost -F <TAB>         - getting filenames and hostnames

This is with 5.4.1. What could explain this behavior, any suggestions
how to fix this (so that in the last case would get only filenames)?

Thanks,

-- 
Marko Myllynen


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Oddity when completing option arguments after command arguments
  2017-12-18 12:01 Oddity when completing option arguments after command arguments Marko Myllynen
@ 2017-12-20  4:52 ` dana
  2017-12-20  9:08   ` Peter Stephenson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: dana @ 2017-12-20  4:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marko Myllynen; +Cc: zsh-workers

On 18 Dec 2017, at 06:01, Marko Myllynen <myllynen@redhat.com> wrote:
>This is with 5.4.1. What could explain this behavior, any suggestions
>how to fix this (so that in the last case would get only filenames)?

I think this would do it?

I didn't test *super* extensively, but it seems to behave as expected in all of
the cases listed, and it passes the existing checks.

dana


diff --git a/Src/Zle/computil.c b/Src/Zle/computil.c
index 71d61563b..0b1ba58dc 100644
--- a/Src/Zle/computil.c
+++ b/Src/Zle/computil.c
@@ -2493,7 +2493,9 @@ ca_set_data(LinkList descr, LinkList act, LinkList subc,
 	 * the case above right.
 	 */
 	if (arg->type == CAA_NORMAL &&
-	    opt && optdef && optdef->type == CAO_NEXT)
+	    opt && optdef &&
+	    (optdef->type == CAO_NEXT || optdef->type == CAO_ODIRECT ||
+	     optdef->type == CAO_OEQUAL))
 	    return;
 
 	if (single)
diff --git a/Test/Y03arguments.ztst b/Test/Y03arguments.ztst
index 7cbadfe8c..761b4b1d2 100644
--- a/Test/Y03arguments.ztst
+++ b/Test/Y03arguments.ztst
@@ -237,6 +237,27 @@
 >NO:{-a}
 >NO:{-b}
 
+ tst_arguments '*'{-x+,--xxx=}':optarg:(1)' '*:operand:(a)'
+ comptest $'tst \t'
+ comptest $'tst -x \t'
+ comptest $'tst -x\t'
+ comptest $'tst --xxx=\t'
+ comptest $'tst --xxx \t'
+ comptest $'tst a -x\t'
+ comptest $'tst a -x \t'
+ comptest $'tst a --xxx=\t'
+ comptest $'tst a --xxx \t'
+0:optarg completion following rest operand on line (workers/42141)
+>line: {tst a }{}
+>line: {tst -x 1 }{}
+>line: {tst -x1 }{}
+>line: {tst --xxx=1 }{}
+>line: {tst --xxx 1 }{}
+>line: {tst a -x1 }{}
+>line: {tst a -x 1 }{}
+>line: {tst a --xxx=1 }{}
+>line: {tst a --xxx 1 }{}
+
  tst_arguments '-a' '*::rest:{compadd - -b}'
  comptest $'tst arg -\t'
 0:rest arguments



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Oddity when completing option arguments after command arguments
  2017-12-20  4:52 ` dana
@ 2017-12-20  9:08   ` Peter Stephenson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Stephenson @ 2017-12-20  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dana, zsh-workers

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 22:52:29 -0600
dana <dana@dana.is> wrote:
> On 18 Dec 2017, at 06:01, Marko Myllynen <myllynen@redhat.com> wrote:
> >This is with 5.4.1. What could explain this behavior, any suggestions
> >how to fix this (so that in the last case would get only filenames)?
> 
> I think this would do it?
> 
> I didn't test *super* extensively, but it seems to behave as expected
> in all of the cases listed, and it passes the existing checks.

Thanks, that looks entirely plausible and this file is magic.  I've
committed it.

pws


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-20  9:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-18 12:01 Oddity when completing option arguments after command arguments Marko Myllynen
2017-12-20  4:52 ` dana
2017-12-20  9:08   ` Peter Stephenson

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).