Is Zsh 5.4.2 considered released?

Is Zsh 5.4.2 considered released?

[Zhiming Wang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 453 bytes --]

Hi,

I package Zsh for Homebrew on macOS. The 5.4.2 tarball has been up on https://www.zsh.org/pub/ since 25 days ago, but it was never announced on the zsh-announce mailing list, and http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Arc/source.html still lists 5.4.1 as the latest. Meanwhile, zsh-5.4.1.tar.xz and zsh-doc-5.4.1.tar.xz are gone on https://www.zsh.org/pub/. So, what exactly is the situation with 5.4.2? Should we go ahead and release it?

Best,
Zhiming

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

Re: Is Zsh 5.4.2 considered released?

[Peter Stephenson]

Yes, it's released (and I'm away on holiday). 

zsh-announce hasn't been reliable for some time now. We're hoping
to switch mail hosting at some point.

pws

On 21 September 2017 14:06:55 BST, Zhiming Wang <zhimingw@princeton.edu> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I package Zsh for Homebrew on macOS. The 5.4.2 tarball has been up on
>https://www.zsh.org/pub/ since 25 days ago, but it was never announced
>on the zsh-announce mailing list, and
>http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Arc/source.html still lists 5.4.1 as the
>latest. Meanwhile, zsh-5.4.1.tar.xz and zsh-doc-5.4.1.tar.xz are gone
>on https://www.zsh.org/pub/. So, what exactly is the situation with
>5.4.2? Should we go ahead and release it?
>
>Best,
>Zhiming

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: Is Zsh 5.4.2 considered released?

[Zhiming Wang]

> On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, it's released (and I'm away on holiday). 
> 
> zsh-announce hasn't been reliable for some time now. We're hoping
> to switch mail hosting at some point.

Thanks, we'll upgrade asap. I do wonder why http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Arc/source.html
isn't updated though. Maybe an oversight?

Best,
Zhiming

Re: Is Zsh 5.4.2 considered released?

[Peter Stephenson]

Yes, sourceforge should certainly be up to date and is generally the most reliable indicator... I'll look next chance I get.

pws

On 21 September 2017 17:57:18 BST, Zhiming Wang <zhimingw@princeton.edu> wrote:
>> On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Peter Stephenson
><p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, it's released (and I'm away on holiday). 
>> 
>> zsh-announce hasn't been reliable for some time now. We're hoping
>> to switch mail hosting at some point.
>
>Thanks, we'll upgrade asap. I do wonder why
>http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Arc/source.html
>isn't updated though. Maybe an oversight?
>
>Best,
>Zhiming

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.