* [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
@ 2021-12-07 19:15 Marlon Richert
2021-12-08 0:22 ` Aaron Schrab
2021-12-08 23:16 ` Oliver Kiddle
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Marlon Richert @ 2021-12-07 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zsh hackers list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 92 bytes --]
This allows local executables to be completed more easily, without the
need for . in $path.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Complete-local-executables-with-.-prefix-if-prefix-nee.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3651 bytes --]
From 6edea832ff20aa31852042286cdba3602f8cd527 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marlon Richert <marlonrichert@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:07:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed
is false
This allows local executables to be completed more easily, without the need for . in $path.
---
Completion/Zsh/Type/_command_names | 15 +++++++++------
Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo | 5 ++++-
Test/Y01completion.ztst | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Completion/Zsh/Type/_command_names b/Completion/Zsh/Type/_command_names
index b1c35f013..68df9522b 100644
--- a/Completion/Zsh/Type/_command_names
+++ b/Completion/Zsh/Type/_command_names
@@ -8,16 +8,15 @@ local args defs ffilt
zstyle -t ":completion:${curcontext}:commands" rehash && rehash
-zstyle -t ":completion:${curcontext}:functions" prefix-needed && \
- [[ $PREFIX != [_.]* ]] && \
- ffilt='[(I)[^_.]*]'
-
defs=(
'commands:external command:_path_commands'
)
-[[ -n "$path[(r).]" || $PREFIX = */* ]] &&
- defs+=( 'executables:executable file:_files -g \*\(-\*\)' )
+if [[ -n "$path[(r).]" || $PREFIX = */* ]]; then
+ defs+=( 'executables:executable file:_files -g \*\(-\*\)' )
+elif ! zstyle -T ":completion:${curcontext}:executables" prefix-needed; then
+ defs+=( 'executables:executable file:_files -g ./\*\(-\*\)' )
+fi
if [[ "$1" = -e ]]; then
shift
@@ -26,6 +25,10 @@ elif (( ${#precommands:|builtin_precommands} )); then
else
[[ "$1" = - ]] && shift
+zstyle -t ":completion:${curcontext}:functions" prefix-needed && \
+ [[ $PREFIX != [_.]* ]] && \
+ ffilt='[(I)[^_.]*]'
+
defs=( "$defs[@]"
'builtins:builtin command:compadd -Qk builtins'
"functions:shell function:compadd -k 'functions$ffilt'"
diff --git a/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo b/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo
index f85293ac7..6f04b8ea8 100644
--- a/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo
+++ b/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo
@@ -2414,7 +2414,7 @@ set to `true' this common prefix must be typed by the user to generate
the matches.
The style is applicable to the tt(options), tt(signals), tt(jobs),
-tt(functions), and tt(parameters) completion tags.
+tt(executables), tt(functions) and tt(parameters) completion tags.
For command options, this means that the initial `tt(-)', `tt(+)', or
`tt(-)tt(-)' must be typed explicitly before option names will be
@@ -2426,6 +2426,9 @@ be completed.
For jobs, an initial `tt(%)' is required before job names will be
completed.
+For executables, an initial `tt(./)' is required before executables that are in
+the current dir (but not in var($path)) will be completed.
+
For function and parameter names, an initial `tt(_)' or `tt(.)' is
required before function or parameter names starting with those
characters will be completed.
diff --git a/Test/Y01completion.ztst b/Test/Y01completion.ztst
index 6af0efc6d..8ff00af6f 100644
--- a/Test/Y01completion.ztst
+++ b/Test/Y01completion.ztst
@@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ F:regression test workers/31611
>FI:{file1}
>FI:{file2}
+ chmod u+x file1 file2
+ comptesteval 'zstyle ":completion:*:executables" prefix-needed no'
+ comptesteval 'zstyle ":completion:*" tag-order executables'
+ comptesteval 'zstyle ":completion:*" matcher-list "l:|=*"'
+ comptest $'f\C-D'
+0:list local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
+>DESCRIPTION:{executable file}
+>EX:{./file1}
+>EX:{./file2}
+
+ comptesteval 'zstyle -d ":completion:*" matcher-list'
comptesteval "typeset -a bar=({$'\\0'..$'\\C-?'})"
comptesteval 'typeset -A bat=( "$bar[@]" )'
comptesteval 'typeset bay="$bar"'
--
2.33.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
2021-12-07 19:15 [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false Marlon Richert
@ 2021-12-08 0:22 ` Aaron Schrab
2021-12-08 0:50 ` Bart Schaefer
2021-12-08 23:16 ` Oliver Kiddle
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Schrab @ 2021-12-08 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marlon Richert; +Cc: Zsh hackers list
At 21:15 +0200 07 Dec 2021, Marlon Richert <marlon.richert@gmail.com> wrote:
>This allows local executables to be completed more easily, without the
>need for . in $path.
The already existing uses of `prefix-needed` are ones that I don't think
setting it to false would cause any serious problems. But for this I
think it's fairly dangerous, although certainly not as dangerous as just
adding `.` to $path. So I don't know if it's a good idea to use that
same name here.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
2021-12-08 0:22 ` Aaron Schrab
@ 2021-12-08 0:50 ` Bart Schaefer
2021-12-08 1:16 ` Aaron Schrab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 2021-12-08 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zsh hackers list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 716 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:23 PM Aaron Schrab <aaron@schrab.com> wrote:
>
> The already existing uses of `prefix-needed` are ones that I don't think
> setting it to false would cause any serious problems. But for this I
> think it's fairly dangerous
>
Hm. I haven't applied the patch to see what effect it has, but it appears
it would cause the "./" to be prefixed onto the command word? If so,
there's visible feedback; if not, the danger would be of invoking a command
that's in $path instead of the intended local executable.
So I'm not strongly concerned about danger; what is the behavior you'd find
troubling?
My question would be whether this needs any further changes to interoperate
with prefix-hidden.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1080 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
2021-12-08 0:50 ` Bart Schaefer
@ 2021-12-08 1:16 ` Aaron Schrab
2021-12-08 16:25 ` Daniel Shahaf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Schrab @ 2021-12-08 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bart Schaefer; +Cc: Zsh hackers list
At 16:50 -0800 07 Dec 2021, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:23 PM Aaron Schrab <aaron@schrab.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The already existing uses of `prefix-needed` are ones that I don't think
>> setting it to false would cause any serious problems. But for this I
>> think it's fairly dangerous
>>
>
>Hm. I haven't applied the patch to see what effect it has, but it appears
>it would cause the "./" to be prefixed onto the command word? If so,
>there's visible feedback; if not, the danger would be of invoking a command
>that's in $path instead of the intended local executable.
>
>So I'm not strongly concerned about danger; what is the behavior you'd find
>troubling?
My main concern is if someone would be in the habit of doing command
completion and then hitting enter without looking at the results. If
done when there's a typo in the prefix that was used it could complete
to something from an untrusted directory instead.
Yes, this requires a few things to go wrong in just the right way for it
to happen. But enabling this option would generally be a one-time thing
for a user, and they may not consider this type of case at the time, and
after awhile even forget about it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
2021-12-08 1:16 ` Aaron Schrab
@ 2021-12-08 16:25 ` Daniel Shahaf
2021-12-08 17:07 ` Bart Schaefer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-12-08 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-workers
Aaron Schrab wrote on Wed, 08 Dec 2021 01:16 +00:00:
> [...] enabling this option would generally be a one-time thing for
> a user, and they may not consider this type of case at the time, and
> after awhile even forget about it.
Furthermore, anyone who has already added «zstyle ':…:*' prefix-needed
false» to their zshrc will silently get the new behaviour when they upgrade.
>
I'm not sure how intuitive the new behaviour is. First, other uses of
prefix-needed generally hide a tag from the matches unless the common
prefix of all matches in that tag is typed; that is, those uses of prefix-needed
could be simulated with a «zstyle -e … tag-order …» setting that
conditionally excludes "signals" or "options" depending on $PREFIX et
al.. This patch's use does not follow that pattern: if the style is set
to true, setting it to false would not cause files in $PWD to be offered
as matches immediately.
That makes me wonder whether a better approach here would be to complete
both executables in $PATH and executables in $PWD, but under separate
tags. If we did that, prefix-needed would have its usual semantics in
this case.
Second, if Alice's $PATH does not include "." and her zstyle settings
are such that «zstyle -T :…:executables prefix-needed» is false, why
should the implied prefix be "./"?
Cheers,
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
2021-12-08 16:25 ` Daniel Shahaf
@ 2021-12-08 17:07 ` Bart Schaefer
2021-12-08 19:13 ` Daniel Shahaf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 2021-12-08 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Shahaf; +Cc: Zsh hackers list
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 8:31 AM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>
> Furthermore, anyone who has already added «zstyle ':…:*' prefix-needed
> false» to their zshrc will silently get the new behaviour when they upgrade.
Yeah, that's probably the biggest objection to re-using this style name.
> ...[Perhaps] a better approach here would be to complete
> both executables in $PATH and executables in $PWD, but under separate
> tags. If we did that, prefix-needed would have its usual semantics in
> this case.
>
> Second, if Alice's $PATH does not include "." and her zstyle settings
> are such that «zstyle -T :…:executables prefix-needed» is false, why
> should the implied prefix be "./"?
The intent of the original patch appears to be to automatically offer
local executables when no matching name is found in the non-local
$path. Does your question imply that it should instead be possible to
complete executables from arbitrary location(s) outside $path, rather
than only locally?
If so, then instead of (or as well as?) prefix-needed, an array-valued
style 'executable-prefixes' (or whatever) could provide a list of
places that should be searched and automatically inserted ahead of the
command word. If combined with the patch's prefix-needed semantic,
one would need to both set prefix-needed to false and set
executable-prefixes to include "./" in order to get Marlon's effect.
That would solve the "silently get new behavior" issue and (I think)
also allow one to e.g. add "/etc/" when completing commands after
"sudo"?
One might then also be able to use the existing mechanisms to create
additional tag names, rather than wiring a new tag name into
_command_names. (This is vaguely similar to Zach's question about
adding a custom tag to "cd" completion.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
2021-12-08 17:07 ` Bart Schaefer
@ 2021-12-08 19:13 ` Daniel Shahaf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-12-08 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-workers
Bart Schaefer wrote on Wed, 08 Dec 2021 17:07 +00:00:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 8:31 AM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>> ...[Perhaps] a better approach here would be to complete
>> both executables in $PATH and executables in $PWD, but under separate
>> tags. If we did that, prefix-needed would have its usual semantics in
>> this case.
>>
>> Second, if Alice's $PATH does not include "." and her zstyle settings
>> are such that «zstyle -T :…:executables prefix-needed» is false, why
>> should the implied prefix be "./"?
>
> […] Does your question imply that it should instead be possible to
> complete executables from arbitrary location(s) outside $path, rather
> than only locally?
I was not trying to imply that we should complete executables from
arbitrary locations, but to ask whether we should do that.
What use-cases are there for wanting a prefix other than "./" to be
implied? (not as the default behaviour, but as an opt-innable behaviour)
Brainstorming:
./bin/
# Could be useful at the root of a project tree whose local scripts
# (such as our Util/preconfig) are under an FHS-esque ./bin/
# directory.
.//
# to complete in subdirectories of $PWD. E.g., «mk<TAB>» would
# offer «Util/mkdisttree.sh» in zsh.git and «src/mkhelp.pl» in
# curl.git, as «.//mk<TAB>» does.
#
# Today, to complete either of those, one would type «s/mk<TAB>» or
# «U/mk<TAB>». Supporting this would save typing "s/" or "U/", just
# like the OP saves typing "./".
../
# to complete in $PWD's parent. E.g., when one has version control
# worktrees of several branches of a single repository in sibling
# directories (e.g., ~/src/zsh/{master,5.8,5.7}/), the common parent
# directory is an obvious place for scripts that might need to run
# in any branch's worktree.
"$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/../"
# Ditto, but from anywhere in the worktree.
/absolute/path/to/the/src/tree/
# when $PWD is the build tree of an out-of-tree build. Useful for
# running «configure» a second time, or for running just one piece
# of a test suite (calling the scripts directly rather than via
# «make test»).
/sbin/
# This would allow completing «ifcon<TAB>» to «/sbin/ifconfig»
# without affecting child processes, and would cause such command
# names to always appear in history as absolute paths. Alternatives
# including adding /sbin to $PATH or «command-path».
I also considered a prefix of «=» and semantics involving the EQUALS
option, but haven't come up with anything.
> If so, then instead of (or as well as?) prefix-needed, an array-valued
> style 'executable-prefixes' (or whatever) could provide a list of
> places that should be searched and automatically inserted ahead of the
> command word. If combined with the patch's prefix-needed semantic,
> one would need to both set prefix-needed to false and set
> executable-prefixes to include "./" in order to get Marlon's effect.
> That would solve the "silently get new behavior" issue
*nod*
> and (I think) also allow one to e.g. add "/etc/" when completing
> commands after "sudo"?
I guess that would involve inspecting ${+funcstack[(r)_sudo]} or
${_comp_priv_prefix}.
> One might then also be able to use the existing mechanisms to create
> additional tag names, rather than wiring a new tag name into
> _command_names. (This is vaguely similar to Zach's question about
> adding a custom tag to "cd" completion.)
Thanks, Bart.
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
2021-12-07 19:15 [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false Marlon Richert
2021-12-08 0:22 ` Aaron Schrab
@ 2021-12-08 23:16 ` Oliver Kiddle
2021-12-08 23:42 ` Bart Schaefer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Kiddle @ 2021-12-08 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marlon Richert; +Cc: Zsh hackers list
Marlon Richert wrote:
> This allows local executables to be completed more easily, without the
> need for . in $path.
This is the type of thing which often can already be achieved with
styles and, where not, a few tweaks may enable it. The nearest example
from my own config involves using the fake style and a matcher to ignore
the prefix. But that's for a more specific context[1].
In this case for the style context, the tag 'commands' is used for a lot
of commands that aren't external Unix commands. The 'executables' tag is
better but guarded by a condition that will evaluate to false:
[[ -n "$path[(r).]" || $PREFIX = */* ]] &&
defs+=( 'executables:executable file:_files -g \*\(-\*\)'
The fake style is looked up in _description so a dummy call to it is one
option. The patch below adds that but I'd be interested in any thoughts
on that. With caveats[2], that allows:
zstyle -e ':completion:*:executables' fake 'reply=( ./*(-*) )'
zstyle ':completion:*:executables' matcher 'b:=./'
There is a command-path style looked up by _command_names to override
$path. But that doesn't entirely help for a couple of reasons. External
commands are completed based on keys of the commands association but
that will not contain commands based on relative directories listed in
$path. Even if it did, they can't be identified to add back a ./ prefix
so that they actually work. In the patch below, I do change it to use
path=( $cmdpath:A ) when the command-path style is set. That resolves
only the first of these issues and allows for relative paths in the
command-path style to work as intended, even if that isn't especially
useful.
Oliver
[1] If anyone's interested, that example is for ssh public keys. Just
the fake and matcher style are needed but it looks like this:
zstyle -e ':completion:*:((ssh|scp|sftp):*:option-i-1|ssh-add:*:argument-rest)' fake '[[ -prefix - ]] || reply=( ~/.ssh/id^*.pub(-.) )'
zstyle -e ':completion:*:((ssh|scp|sftp):*:option-i-1|ssh-add:*:argument-rest)' matcher '[[ -prefix - ]] || reply=( "l:|=*" )'
zstyle ':completion:*:((ssh|scp|sftp):*:option-i-1|ssh-add:*:argument-rest)' menu yes=0 search
zstyle ':completion:*:((ssh|scp|sftp):*:option-i-1|ssh-add:*:argument-rest)' list-colors "=(#b)(*/)(*)==38;5;208=0"
[2] With the fake style in general, the return status of the calling
completion function doesn't account for fake matches which may mean
unwanted later completers are invoked (e.g. _approximate).
diff --git a/Completion/Zsh/Type/_command_names b/Completion/Zsh/Type/_command_names
index b1c35f013..12cbd69c1 100644
--- a/Completion/Zsh/Type/_command_names
+++ b/Completion/Zsh/Type/_command_names
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# complete only external commands and executable files. This and a
# `-' as the first argument is then removed from the arguments.
-local args defs ffilt
+local args defs expl ffilt
zstyle -t ":completion:${curcontext}:commands" rehash && rehash
@@ -16,8 +16,12 @@ defs=(
'commands:external command:_path_commands'
)
-[[ -n "$path[(r).]" || $PREFIX = */* ]] &&
- defs+=( 'executables:executable file:_files -g \*\(-\*\)' )
+if [[ -n "$path[(r).]" || $PREFIX = */* ]]; then
+ defs+=( 'executables:executable file:_files -g \*\(-\*\)' )
+else
+ # this is ignored but exists to facilitate the use of the fake style
+ _description executables expl 'executable file'
+fi
if [[ "$1" = -e ]]; then
shift
@@ -58,7 +62,7 @@ fi
if (( $#cmdpath )); then
local -a +h path
local -A +h commands
- path=( $cmdpath )
+ path=( $cmdpath:A )
fi
_alternative -O args "$defs[@]"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
2021-12-08 23:16 ` Oliver Kiddle
@ 2021-12-08 23:42 ` Bart Schaefer
2021-12-09 21:19 ` Oliver Kiddle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 2021-12-08 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Kiddle; +Cc: Marlon Richert, Zsh hackers list
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:18 PM Oliver Kiddle <opk@zsh.org> wrote:
>
> This is the type of thing which often can already be achieved with
> styles and, where not, a few tweaks may enable it. The nearest example
> from my own config involves using the fake style
Yeah, I was pretty sure there was a way to get here using the "fake"
style but couldn't put my finger on the argument Daniel found to argue
against changes to prefix-needed.
> The fake style is looked up in _description so a dummy call to it is one
> option. The patch below adds that but I'd be interested in any thoughts
> on that.
Is it going to matter that this happens before command-path is
consulted? And before the defs array is passed to _alternative?
> path=( $cmdpath:A ) when the command-path style is set. That resolves
> only the first of these issues and allows for relative paths in the
> command-path style to work as intended, even if that isn't especially
> useful.
Does that have any unexpected interaction with PATH_DIRS ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false
2021-12-08 23:42 ` Bart Schaefer
@ 2021-12-09 21:19 ` Oliver Kiddle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Kiddle @ 2021-12-09 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bart Schaefer; +Cc: Marlon Richert, Zsh hackers list
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > The fake style is looked up in _description so a dummy call to it is one
> > option. The patch below adds that but I'd be interested in any thoughts
> > on that.
>
> Is it going to matter that this happens before command-path is
> consulted? And before the defs array is passed to _alternative?
I don't think so, other than the point I already mentioned about the
return status from _command_names not accounting for the fake matches.
fake is usually handled early because _description needs to be called
before compadd.
> > path=( $cmdpath:A ) when the command-path style is set. That resolves
> Does that have any unexpected interaction with PATH_DIRS ?
Not with the actual path_dirs functionality because of path being
local in the function. In terms of completion down in _path_commands
that still works. It ought to filter out "." from $path anyway to
avoid duplicated completions. It also doesn't add a / suffix for
the directories and didn't account for symlinks to executables. So
I've included a patch against the completion handling for path_dirs.
:A will subvert the filtering of "." but the effect is very minor.
I'm unsure whether command-path should perhaps be looked up before
the $path[(r).] check in _command_names.
Oliver
diff --git a/Completion/Unix/Type/_path_commands b/Completion/Unix/Type/_path_commands
index 66795ae0f..4d5a6c5af 100644
--- a/Completion/Unix/Type/_path_commands
+++ b/Completion/Unix/Type/_path_commands
@@ -87,18 +87,19 @@ fi
# 'if' block move up to the "_command_names -" branch of _command_names?
if [[ -o path_dirs ]]; then
local -a path_dirs
- path_dirs=(${^path}/*(/N:t))
- (( ${#path_dirs} )) &&
- _wanted path-dirs expl 'directory in path' compadd "$@" -a path_dirs && ret=0
if [[ $PREFIX$SUFFIX = */* ]]; then
+ path_dirs=( ${path:#.} )
# Find command from path, not hashed
- _wanted commands expl 'external command' _path_files -W path -g '*(*)' &&
- ret=0
+ _wanted commands expl 'external command' _path_files -W path_dirs -g '*(-*)' && ret=0
+ else
+ path_dirs=(${^path}/*(/N:t))
+ (( ${#path_dirs} )) &&
+ _wanted path-dirs expl 'directory in path' compadd "$@" -S / -a path_dirs && ret=0
fi
fi
-return $ret
+return ret
}
_path_commands "$@"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-09 21:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-07 19:15 [FEATURE][PATCH] Complete local executables with ./ prefix, if prefix-needed is false Marlon Richert
2021-12-08 0:22 ` Aaron Schrab
2021-12-08 0:50 ` Bart Schaefer
2021-12-08 1:16 ` Aaron Schrab
2021-12-08 16:25 ` Daniel Shahaf
2021-12-08 17:07 ` Bart Schaefer
2021-12-08 19:13 ` Daniel Shahaf
2021-12-08 23:16 ` Oliver Kiddle
2021-12-08 23:42 ` Bart Schaefer
2021-12-09 21:19 ` Oliver Kiddle
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).