* Re: Version 4.2.2 of zsh released [not found] <200501121257.j0CCvDS4024242__47538.8375147761$1105534784$gmane$org@news01.csr.com> @ 2005-01-13 8:19 ` Alexey Vatchenko 2005-01-13 10:30 ` Peter Stephenson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alexey Vatchenko @ 2005-01-13 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-workers Peter Stephenson wrote: > I've uploaded version 4.2.2 to ftp.zsh.org. Please try it out on as > many systems as possible before I upload it to Sourceforge and announce > it on Freshmeat. It would be especially good if someone could confirm > that there are now no problems on Cygwin. Where can i get NT port of last zsh? (AFAIK Cygwin Zsh != NT port Zsh) -- %kill -9 `ps ax | grep "BUG" | awk '{print $1}'`; echo debugged | mail -s "gdb" avv@mail.zp.ua ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Version 4.2.2 of zsh released 2005-01-13 8:19 ` Version 4.2.2 of zsh released Alexey Vatchenko @ 2005-01-13 10:30 ` Peter Stephenson 2005-01-13 12:47 ` Alexey Vatchenko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Peter Stephenson @ 2005-01-13 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Vatchenko, zsh-workers Alexey Vatchenko wrote: > Where can i get NT port of last zsh? (AFAIK Cygwin Zsh != NT port Zsh) You're correct that the Cygwin version isn't the same as native NT (2000, XP). However, the changes to compile natively under Windows are substantial and Cygwin have done most of the work for us. Furthermore, you won't get very far with any of the supplied functions without a set of Unix tools, and they assume Unix file name semantics. In short, Cygwin is almost certainly your best bet. As far as I know the older zsh that ran natively under Windows isn't being maintained. By the way, the changes for Mac are enough that I will produce 4.2.3. Most people should be satistified with 4.2.2. -- Peter Stephenson <pws@csr.com> Software Engineer CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ********************************************************************** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Version 4.2.2 of zsh released 2005-01-13 10:30 ` Peter Stephenson @ 2005-01-13 12:47 ` Alexey Vatchenko 2005-01-13 13:03 ` Alexey Vatchenko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alexey Vatchenko @ 2005-01-13 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-workers Peter Stephenson wrote: > Alexey Vatchenko wrote: > >>Where can i get NT port of last zsh? (AFAIK Cygwin Zsh != NT port Zsh) > > You're correct that the Cygwin version isn't the same as native NT > (2000, XP). However, the changes to compile natively under Windows are > substantial and Cygwin have done most of the work for us. Furthermore, > you won't get very far with any of the supplied functions without a set > of Unix tools, and they assume Unix file name semantics. In short, > Cygwin is almost certainly your best bet. I use zsh 3.0.5-nt-beta-0.75 and *very happy* about Unix name semantics. And i use it exactly because of Unix name semantics. But there are some bugs in that version (which i tried to fix manually, and i have quick-n-dirty fixed some). I use Unix utilities from http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/. They are very happy about Unix name semantics too. Even vim likes it. The main reason i use Unix name semantics is Windows understands it too. Cygwin, in other hand, uses names that actually does not exist in system. And that's why i don't like Microsoft Services for Unix as well. > As far as I know the older zsh that ran natively under Windows isn't > being maintained. too bad! -- %kill -9 `ps ax | grep "BUG" | awk '{print $1}'`; echo debugged | mail -s "gdb" avv@mail.zp.ua ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Version 4.2.2 of zsh released 2005-01-13 12:47 ` Alexey Vatchenko @ 2005-01-13 13:03 ` Alexey Vatchenko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Alexey Vatchenko @ 2005-01-13 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-workers Under Unix name semantics i mean real paths with unix slashes (and optionally + windows driver letter). # pwd c:/ # ls / -- content of disk c: -- # ls d:/ -- content of disk d: -- It's cool. AFAIK, vim doesn't understand Cygwin paths. -- %kill -9 `ps ax | grep "BUG" | awk '{print $1}'`; echo debugged | mail -s "gdb" avv@mail.zp.ua ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200501121257.j0CCvDS4024242@news01.csr.com>]
* Re: Version 4.2.2 of zsh released [not found] <200501121257.j0CCvDS4024242@news01.csr.com> @ 2005-01-12 16:27 ` Oliver Kiddle 2005-01-12 20:00 ` Wayne Davison 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Oliver Kiddle @ 2005-01-12 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-workers Peter wrote: > I've uploaded version 4.2.2 to ftp.zsh.org. Please try it out on as > many systems as possible before I upload it to Sourceforge and announce Well it failed on Sourceforge's older Mac OS X machine. (I'll try a few other machines sometime later) Looks like there was a mistake made when the UNUSED macro was copied from wherever it came: Index: system.h =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/zsh/zsh/Src/system.h,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -r1.20 system.h --- system.h 2 Jun 2004 18:11:43 -0000 1.20 +++ system.h 12 Jan 2005 16:22:29 -0000 @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ # define IS_DIRSEP(c) ((c) == '/') #endif -#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(APPLE) +#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__APPLE__) /* Does the OS X port of gcc still gag on __attribute__? */ #define UNUSED(x) x __attribute__((__unused__)) #else ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Version 4.2.2 of zsh released 2005-01-12 16:27 ` Oliver Kiddle @ 2005-01-12 20:00 ` Wayne Davison 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Wayne Davison @ 2005-01-12 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oliver Kiddle; +Cc: zsh-workers On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:27:13PM +0100, Oliver Kiddle wrote: > Well it failed on Sourceforge's older Mac OS X machine. (I'll try a few > other machines sometime later) Looks like there was a mistake made when > the UNUSED macro was copied from wherever it came: The idiom came from rsync (though the code did not -- I wrote it myself). Perhaps no one has tried to compile rsync on an older Mac OS X machine, because rsync checks for APPLE, not __APPLE__. ..wayne.. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-13 13:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200501121257.j0CCvDS4024242__47538.8375147761$1105534784$gmane$org@news01.csr.com>
2005-01-13 8:19 ` Version 4.2.2 of zsh released Alexey Vatchenko
2005-01-13 10:30 ` Peter Stephenson
2005-01-13 12:47 ` Alexey Vatchenko
2005-01-13 13:03 ` Alexey Vatchenko
[not found] <200501121257.j0CCvDS4024242@news01.csr.com>
2005-01-12 16:27 ` Oliver Kiddle
2005-01-12 20:00 ` Wayne Davison
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/ This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).