From: a@9srv.net
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:38:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0195f1229ebe57f1dddce928e5809f54@9srv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a03888bc4077fcac1298b2e80fc34aa@quanstro.net>
there's a certain level of administration required, sure, but i think
eric's point was that the level of administration required just to get
a good VM environment up is pretty minimal. if your VM has its own
access to disk and network, you needn't have linux users or full
network information. especially if your linux has been gutted so you
don't have "helpful" demons running around in the background, this
can be a fairly light - and front-loaded - burden. non-zero, to be
sure, but not what you'd expect from a normal production linux box.
anthony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-08 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-08 15:28 kokamoto
2008-07-08 15:58 ` David Leimbach
2008-07-08 16:04 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 16:33 ` ron minnich
2008-07-08 16:47 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-07-09 4:33 ` LiteStar numnums
2008-07-08 17:46 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-08 17:49 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 18:38 ` a [this message]
2008-07-08 19:01 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 19:46 ` a
2008-07-08 20:03 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-08 20:15 ` William Josephson
2008-07-08 20:38 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-08 21:25 ` ron minnich
2008-07-08 22:16 ` Steve Simon
2008-07-08 22:32 ` David du Colombier
2008-07-09 0:01 ` don bailey
2008-07-09 0:13 ` ron minnich
2008-07-09 3:17 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-09 3:43 ` ron minnich
2008-07-09 3:45 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-09 4:44 ` David Leimbach
2008-07-08 18:50 ` David Leimbach
2008-07-08 17:19 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2008-07-10 12:58 ` matt
2008-07-10 13:47 ` Russ Cox
2008-07-10 14:03 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] ` <B94154D0-97B5-4FFF-A140-E47D95FC1307@flyingwalrus.net>
2008-07-12 15:59 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-10 15:18 ` ron minnich
2008-07-10 16:33 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-07-10 16:36 ` ron minnich
2008-07-10 19:25 ` cinap_lenrek
2008-07-10 19:50 ` ron minnich
2008-07-11 9:10 ` Kernel Panic
2008-07-11 16:12 ` ron minnich
2008-07-10 14:01 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 17:27 ` Russ Cox
2008-07-08 17:39 ` a
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0195f1229ebe57f1dddce928e5809f54@9srv.net \
--to=a@9srv.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).