9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: a@9srv.net
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?
Date: Tue,  8 Jul 2008 15:46:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67d32703c39ead7d16cf751cecf5dc44@9srv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6966d55ac896b3459f889b77a5bfc787@quanstro.net>

i believe i am, but perhaps your experience is different from
mine. certainly there's less stuff to worry about patches for
if you've got less stuff on the box. again, the idea is not to
take ubuntu (or whatever) and stick a VM on top, but rather to
strip the linux down to just what's needed to run the VM, like
THNX. far fewer security updates, although i suppose one could
argue it'll be more manual, ad hoc, and time consuming per
update. i've not done enough of that to really say.

i'm certainly not trying to convince you to run linux. if you
don't have a pre-existing compelling reason to run it, don't.
all i (and i believe eric) am saying is that if you *do* have
such a reason, a tailored VM environment can reduce the burden
quite a lot.

anthony



  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-08 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-08 15:28 kokamoto
2008-07-08 15:58 ` David Leimbach
2008-07-08 16:04   ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 16:33     ` ron minnich
2008-07-08 16:47       ` Charles Forsyth
2008-07-09  4:33         ` LiteStar numnums
2008-07-08 17:46     ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-08 17:49       ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 18:38         ` a
2008-07-08 19:01           ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 19:46             ` a [this message]
2008-07-08 20:03         ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-08 20:15           ` William Josephson
2008-07-08 20:38             ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-08 21:25             ` ron minnich
2008-07-08 22:16               ` Steve Simon
2008-07-08 22:32                 ` David du Colombier
2008-07-09  0:01                   ` don bailey
2008-07-09  0:13                     ` ron minnich
2008-07-09  3:17                       ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-09  3:43                         ` ron minnich
2008-07-09  3:45                           ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-09  4:44                           ` David Leimbach
2008-07-08 18:50     ` David Leimbach
2008-07-08 17:19 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2008-07-10 12:58   ` matt
2008-07-10 13:47     ` Russ Cox
2008-07-10 14:03       ` erik quanstrom
     [not found]         ` <B94154D0-97B5-4FFF-A140-E47D95FC1307@flyingwalrus.net>
2008-07-12 15:59           ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-10 15:18       ` ron minnich
2008-07-10 16:33         ` Charles Forsyth
2008-07-10 16:36           ` ron minnich
2008-07-10 19:25             ` cinap_lenrek
2008-07-10 19:50               ` ron minnich
2008-07-11  9:10                 ` Kernel Panic
2008-07-11 16:12                   ` ron minnich
2008-07-10 14:01     ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 17:27 ` Russ Cox
2008-07-08 17:39   ` a

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67d32703c39ead7d16cf751cecf5dc44@9srv.net \
    --to=a@9srv.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).