From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:58:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1162e60807080858o499bc3c4l514056f090751e4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4f625010045271878765374f9fc8d8c@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 850 bytes --]
I believe the reasoning is as such:
Linux has more drivers than Plan 9, therefore Plan 9 should run on linux.
Use Linux as your driver repository... this is an approach used by some
microkernel systems like L4.
Dave
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:28 AM, <kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp> wrote:
> I downloaded Russ's 9vx and vx32 source tree Ford's web page,
> and build those on my Debian stable machine.
> I also read the paper of vx32 last week.
> Now, everything goes fine, and got a fun to play with
> games/mahjongg on that virtual machine.
> Thank you very much Russ!
>
> However, I have somewhat confused mind.... Why it's not Linux vx for
> Plan9? I have no intention to make it bad, however, if we believe
> Plan 9 is better than Linux, then Linux vx for Plan9 should be more
> neccessary, shouldn't ?
>
> Kenji
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1128 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-08 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-08 15:28 kokamoto
2008-07-08 15:58 ` David Leimbach [this message]
2008-07-08 16:04 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 16:33 ` ron minnich
2008-07-08 16:47 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-07-09 4:33 ` LiteStar numnums
2008-07-08 17:46 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-08 17:49 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 18:38 ` a
2008-07-08 19:01 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 19:46 ` a
2008-07-08 20:03 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-08 20:15 ` William Josephson
2008-07-08 20:38 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-08 21:25 ` ron minnich
2008-07-08 22:16 ` Steve Simon
2008-07-08 22:32 ` David du Colombier
2008-07-09 0:01 ` don bailey
2008-07-09 0:13 ` ron minnich
2008-07-09 3:17 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-07-09 3:43 ` ron minnich
2008-07-09 3:45 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-09 4:44 ` David Leimbach
2008-07-08 18:50 ` David Leimbach
2008-07-08 17:19 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2008-07-10 12:58 ` matt
2008-07-10 13:47 ` Russ Cox
2008-07-10 14:03 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] ` <B94154D0-97B5-4FFF-A140-E47D95FC1307@flyingwalrus.net>
2008-07-12 15:59 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-10 15:18 ` ron minnich
2008-07-10 16:33 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-07-10 16:36 ` ron minnich
2008-07-10 19:25 ` cinap_lenrek
2008-07-10 19:50 ` ron minnich
2008-07-11 9:10 ` Kernel Panic
2008-07-11 16:12 ` ron minnich
2008-07-10 14:01 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-08 17:27 ` Russ Cox
2008-07-08 17:39 ` a
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e1162e60807080858o499bc3c4l514056f090751e4@mail.gmail.com \
--to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).