RE: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

RE: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

[Tiit Lankots]

Not to mention that http://www.collyer.net points to a... err... 
rather interesting place. Not unrelated, tho :)

RE: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

[Geoff Collyer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 198 bytes --]

Curious.  Claudia is my wife, so it's not completely off the wall, but
it is unexpected.  I visit www.collyer.net reasonably often, so it
hasn't been doing this for long.  Thanks for the notice.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2201 bytes --]

From: "Tiit Lankots" <t.lankots@aprote.ee>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: RE: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:28:14 +0200
Message-ID: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE479D64@black.aprote.com>

Not to mention that http://www.collyer.net points to a... err... 
rather interesting place. Not unrelated, tho :)

RE: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

[9nut]

> Curious.  Claudia is my wife, so it's not completely off the wall, but
> it is unexpected.  I visit www.collyer.net reasonably often, so it
> hasn't been doing this for long.  Thanks for the notice.

My wife's birthday is coming up. Is there anything with
a glenda motif? Earrings perhaps?

RE: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

[Geoff Collyer]

I believe www.collyer.net now points to the right web server.  It
looks like I made a mistake editing cnames when we shuffled machines
recently.  In a few minutes, the corrected DNS data will have
circulated.

Re: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

[boyd, rounin]

doumo arigatou gozaimasu

Re: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

[boyd, rounin]

making things failsafe is hard.  drowning in noise o

    i'm ok

is not a solution, nor neither is silently chucking
stuff on the floor.

geoff-kun

Re: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

[Geoff Collyer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 465 bytes --]

Matt, I'm not sure what happened.  I remove everything under
/mail/grey each night, so perhaps your system tried to call once on
the 7th and then not again until the 13th?  The greylist code does
assume that an unknown caller will call back within the same day.  If
your cron is only running the mail queues every day or week, I'd
suggest changing it to once per hour.  Transient failures are possible
even when calling sites that don't implement greylists.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2436 bytes --]

From: matt@proweb.co.uk
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:08:08 0000
Message-ID: <9a2bfccc4355091cbc88a27f04521ccc@juice.thebigchoice.com>

Sorry for sending it here but as you can see, I can't mail geoff

 From /dev/null Thu Mar 18 13:06:05 GMT 2004
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:06:05 0000
From: /dev/null
To: matt
Subject: permanent failure

Your request ``mail net!collyer.net geoff '' failed (code Giveup).
The symptom was:

Sun Mar  7 22:54:04 GMT 2004 connect to net!collyer.net:
451 please try again soon from the same IP.

Sat Mar 13 11:45:39 GMT 2004 connect to net!collyer.net:
451 please try again soon from the same IP.


--- 1.2 message/rfc822 282 (from,matt@proweb.co.uk)(subj,usbd) /mail/fs/mbox/74/2/body.msg

Subject: usbd
From: matt@proweb.co.uk
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:53:44 0000
To: geoff@collyer.net

thanks, it is my machine

matt

Re: [9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

[matt]

lol, now my outgoing mail is working too well, marshall split them up

hehe now i deleted them both

anyway it said something like (dates roughly correct)


8th March couldn't send, remote said
451 Please try again soon from the same IP

16th March couldn't send, remote said
451 Please try again soon from the same IP

18th March
Permanent failure, giving up

[9fans] geoff's anti spam worked a bit too well

[matt]

Sorry for sending it here but as you can see, I can't mail geoff

 From /dev/null Thu Mar 18 13:06:05 GMT 2004
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:06:05 0000
From: /dev/null
To: matt
Subject: permanent failure

Your request ``mail net!collyer.net geoff '' failed (code Giveup).
The symptom was:

Sun Mar  7 22:54:04 GMT 2004 connect to net!collyer.net:
451 please try again soon from the same IP.

Sat Mar 13 11:45:39 GMT 2004 connect to net!collyer.net:
451 please try again soon from the same IP.


--- 1.2 message/rfc822 282 (from,matt@proweb.co.uk)(subj,usbd) /mail/fs/mbox/74/2/body.msg

Subject: usbd
From: matt@proweb.co.uk
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:53:44 0000
To: geoff@collyer.net

thanks, it is my machine

matt