9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Lukes <davel@anvil.com>
To: 9fans <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] insularity
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:53:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079545993.14420.684.camel@zevon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a2483a3e86ca91902d7199212d02f44@vitanuova.com>

> oh for f***'s sake!

Careful: you're next:-).

> ok, so david tolpin has been a bit verbose, (and we're naturally
> suspicious that his deep involvement with XML implies a fundamental
> lack of taste)

Not the deep involvement:
I and at least one or 2 other people on this list have used XML,
but don't evangelise about it 'cos we know it's barfious.

>  but when it comes down to it, he's has actually dived
> in there and done stuff.

Cool, which means he's halfway there.

> most newcomers to plan 9 don't get further than booting the damn
> thing.

Which means that some people don't want to talk to them,
which is fine too!


> i think people that have been involved in this stuff for a long time
> forget the distance between plan 9 and other systems.

No, I continually thank my non-existent deity for that distance.

>   yes, most stuff
> is documented (often by implication), but having someone to talk to
> that knows about the system makes all the difference.

Yes, but expecting them to answer _all_ your questions is not useful.

>   i think all
> david's questions have been perfectly acceptable, and i wouldn't have
> thought twice about answering them had they been asked by someone
> across the room.

Fine.  We differ.

> this system *needs* people with some energy to spare, otherwise it'll
> continue to decline the way it has been since the great scattering from
> bell labs.

I don't see the benefit in involving people who don't "get it":
we'll end up with linux again.

Also, if plan9 dies, then maybe it will be down to bad luck,
or maybe it deserves to, because it ain't good enough.
If that is the case, then, in another few years,
some bright spark in a room somewhere will say,
"I know, let's write our own ..." and history will repeat itself.

>   if this is the way we treat someone who appears to have
> some energy and inclination, then i've no hope at all.

We treat everyone the same around here ...

>   i'm ashamed to
> be part of this group.

Then don't be.

I admit to being ashamed of my own brutality at times,
but the alternative (spoonfeeding people)
is far, far worse.

> > If you can't get over this initial conceptual hump,
> > then fuck off back to CrapOS and leave us alone.

> *cringe*

I stand by it:
if you're not willing to do the brainwork to understand the system,
don't use it.  It ain't Windows.

	Dave.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-17 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200403161953.i2GJrNMv080779@adat.davidashen.net>
2004-03-16 22:54 ` [9fans] Novice question - run as other 9nut
2004-03-17  7:18   ` David Tolpin
2004-03-17  8:10     ` Geoff Collyer
2004-03-17  8:24       ` David Tolpin
2004-03-17  8:55         ` Geoff Collyer
2004-03-17  9:04           ` David Tolpin
2004-03-17  9:19           ` Bruce Ellis
2004-03-17 10:31           ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-17 14:01             ` Dave Lukes
2004-03-17 16:22           ` [9fans] insularity rog
2004-03-17 16:32             ` Aharon Robbins
2004-03-17 16:36             ` suspect
2004-03-17 16:48               ` lucio
2004-03-17 18:09                 ` Dave Lukes
2004-03-17 19:26                   ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-03-18 13:50                     ` Dave Lukes
2004-03-17 22:48                   ` Geoff Collyer
2004-03-17 23:11                     ` David Presotto
2004-03-18  7:47                     ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-18  2:45                 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-17 17:53             ` Dave Lukes [this message]
2004-03-17 19:12               ` Latchesar Ionkov
2004-03-17 18:56             ` vdharani
2004-03-18  2:39             ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-17  9:33     ` [9fans] Novice question - run as other 9nut
2004-03-17  8:54       ` David Tolpin
2004-03-17  8:56         ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-17  9:07           ` David Tolpin
2004-03-17  9:17             ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-17  9:28               ` David Tolpin
2004-03-17 10:08         ` 9nut
2004-03-17 16:52 [9fans] insularity Noah Evans
2004-03-17 17:24 ` ron minnich
2004-03-17 17:25 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-03-17 17:43 ` Dave Lukes
2004-03-17 17:59   ` rog
2004-03-17 17:58     ` Dave Lukes
2004-03-17 18:19       ` Don Bailey
2004-03-17 18:18         ` David Presotto
2004-03-18  7:23       ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-18  1:05 ` bs
2004-03-18  1:20   ` Taj Khattra
2004-03-17 17:53 Noah Evans
2004-03-17 18:11 Noah Evans
2004-03-18  2:08 Noah Evans
2004-03-18  8:14 ` Michael H. Collins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1079545993.14420.684.camel@zevon \
    --to=davel@anvil.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).