* Red: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9
@ 1997-09-08 9:10 Nigel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nigel @ 1997-09-08 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
Yes, I remember that. It was exactly light on it's feet.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk [SMTP:forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk]
>Sent: Monday, September 08, 1997 8:18 AM
>To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
>Subject: Re: Red: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9
>
>>>Check out commercial middle ware "Tuxedo" by BEA software too... It is
>
>AT&T and later Unix System Labs developed and sold a transaction processing
>system
>called `Tuxedo' in the late 80s or early 90s. are they by any chance
>related?
>(mind you, USL might have done better selling dinner jackets
>for all the good they did with Unix.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Red: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9
@ 1997-09-08 9:30 Nigel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nigel @ 1997-09-08 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
Damme. I meant "it _wasn't_ exactly light on it's feet".
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nigel Roles [SMTP:ngr@symbionics.co.uk]
>Sent: Monday, September 08, 1997 10:10 AM
>To: '9fans@cse.psu.edu'
>Subject: RE: Red: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9
>
>Yes, I remember that. It was exactly light on it's feet.
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk [SMTP:forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk]
>>Sent: Monday, September 08, 1997 8:18 AM
>>To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
>>Subject: Re: Red: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9
>>
>>>>Check out commercial middle ware "Tuxedo" by BEA software too... It is
>>
>>AT&T and later Unix System Labs developed and sold a transaction processing
>>system
>>called `Tuxedo' in the late 80s or early 90s. are they by any chance
>>related?
>>(mind you, USL might have done better selling dinner jackets
>>for all the good they did with Unix.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Red: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9
@ 1997-09-08 6:18 forsyth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 1997-09-08 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>Check out commercial middle ware "Tuxedo" by BEA software too... It is
AT&T and later Unix System Labs developed and sold a transaction processing system
called `Tuxedo' in the late 80s or early 90s. are they by any chance related?
(mind you, USL might have done better selling dinner jackets
for all the good they did with Unix.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Red: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9
@ 1997-09-07 19:58 Brandon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brandon @ 1997-09-07 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 4 Sep 1997, G. David Butler wrote:
> From: Mike Haertel <mike@ducky.net>
> >
> >> To go to isolation level 4 in a distributed database
> >>you need *more*.
> >
> >That's interesting. I've been trying to gain an understanding
> >of transaction processing. I'm only familiar with the 2P commit
> >stuff. Do you have any references on the sort of protocols you
> >need to get the high isolation levels in a distributing setting?
> >Especially interested in on-line stuff; I don't have easy access
> >to a university library.
>
> Well, you can look at distributed OSs like amoeba or distributed
> middleware like ISIS. A good place for transaction info is
> the Transaction Processing Performance Council (www.tpc.org)
> of TPC-A,B,C&D fame.
Check out commercial middle ware "Tuxedo" by BEA software too... It is
distributed application management and OLTP as well I believe. I haven't
seen it yet, but one of our architecture guys was looking at it and he
really liked it.
>
> For my part, since everyone is so patent crazy now, I just roll
> my own... (and document the hell out of the dates and processes.)
>
> David Butler
> gdb@dbSystems.com
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Red: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9
@ 1997-09-05 3:34 G.David
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: G.David @ 1997-09-05 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
From: Mike Haertel <mike@ducky.net>
>
>> To go to isolation level 4 in a distributed database
>>you need *more*.
>
>That's interesting. I've been trying to gain an understanding
>of transaction processing. I'm only familiar with the 2P commit
>stuff. Do you have any references on the sort of protocols you
>need to get the high isolation levels in a distributing setting?
>Especially interested in on-line stuff; I don't have easy access
>to a university library.
Well, you can look at distributed OSs like amoeba or distributed
middleware like ISIS. A good place for transaction info is
the Transaction Processing Performance Council (www.tpc.org)
of TPC-A,B,C&D fame.
For my part, since everyone is so patent crazy now, I just roll
my own... (and document the hell out of the dates and processes.)
David Butler
gdb@dbSystems.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-09-08 9:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-09-08 9:10 Red: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9 Nigel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-09-08 9:30 Nigel
1997-09-08 6:18 forsyth
1997-09-07 19:58 Brandon
1997-09-05 3:34 G.David
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).