9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [9fans] IPv6
@ 2000-05-08 12:56 presotto
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: presotto @ 2000-05-08 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)


I started implementing IPv6 and got deflected doing other stuff.  The
IP stack in the upcoming release is still IPv4 but the interface to
user programs uses IPv6 addresses (with the embedded IPv4 format for
v4 addresses).  It's kind of odd without a v6 stack, but I was hoping
to get back to the v6 implementation and wanted to make sure I didn't
have to go and change all the user level code again.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [9fans] IPv6
@ 2000-05-08 14:06 Lucio
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Lucio @ 2000-05-08 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)


On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:56:45AM -0400, presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
>
> I started implementing IPv6 and got deflected doing other stuff.  The
> IP stack in the upcoming release is still IPv4 but the interface to
> user programs uses IPv6 addresses (with the embedded IPv4 format for
> v4 addresses).  It's kind of odd without a v6 stack, but I was hoping
> to get back to the v6 implementation and wanted to make sure I didn't
> have to go and change all the user level code again.

My head spins whenever the KAME project developer (itojun) makes a new
announcement on the NetBSD network mailing list - I'm beginning to think
I'm getting too old for this game :-)

As for your approach, it makes a lot of good sense.  And it's always
good to take into consideration other people's mistakes when tackling
something as formidable as IPv6.  Good luck :-)

++L




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [9fans] IPv6
@ 2000-05-08 14:38 Lucio
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Lucio @ 2000-05-08 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)


On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:56:45AM -0400, presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
>
> I started implementing IPv6 and got deflected doing other stuff.  The
> IP stack in the upcoming release is still IPv4 but the interface to
> user programs uses IPv6 addresses (with the embedded IPv4 format for
> v4 addresses).  It's kind of odd without a v6 stack, but I was hoping
> to get back to the v6 implementation and wanted to make sure I didn't
> have to go and change all the user level code again.

My head spins whenever the KAME project developer (itojun) makes a new
announcement on the NetBSD network mailing list - I'm beginning to think
I'm getting too old for this game :-)

As for your approach, it makes a lot of good sense.  And it's always
good to take into consideration other people's mistakes when tackling
something as formidable as IPv6.  Good luck :-)

++L




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [9fans] ipv6
@ 2002-05-28 12:29 presotto
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: presotto @ 2002-05-28 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

I moved our ipv4+6 stack onto sources.cs.bell-labs.com.  Be careful,
we've been running it for a few weeks so it shouldn't totally blow you
away but it lots less tested than what was out there.  There's
a new ipconfig.c coming too, I'm in the midst of changing it so
it'll follow in a few days.  The current one works with the new
stack (as long as you've kept up with changes to it and readipifc).



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [9fans] ipv6
@ 2007-04-20 21:41 geoff
  2007-04-20 23:46 ` Tim Wiess
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: geoff @ 2007-04-20 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Over the last two days I've pushed out a new ipconfig, some small
utilities, and changes to the kernel and manual pages.  ipconfig(8) is
a good place to start.  ipconfig is now able to configure more of the
ipv6 stack, in particular automatically configuring the link-local
address and enabling sending or receiving of router advertisements.

I haven't been able to test the IPv6 functionality very thoroughly
here, though it does seem to work at least minimally.  Feedback on the
new ipconfig from people who are using IPv6 is welcomed.

The ipv6 attribute is now documented in ndb(6), but the trade-off
between just using an ip attribute with an IPv6 address and using the
ipv6 attribute is not yet obvious to me.

One thing we don't have yet is DHCPv6.  The sheer size of the stack of
paper that is the DHCPv6 RFCs is daunting.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [9fans] IPV6
@ 2017-04-01  9:36 Bruce Ellis
  2017-04-01  9:46 ` Ori Bernstein
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ellis @ 2017-04-01  9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 142 bytes --]

Does anyone know what IPV6 addresses like fec0:0:0:ffff%1 mean and how to
make a real (plan9) IPV6 address from them.

Regards.

brucee

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 206 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-01 16:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-05-08 12:56 [9fans] IPv6 presotto
2000-05-08 14:06 Lucio
2000-05-08 14:38 Lucio
2002-05-28 12:29 [9fans] ipv6 presotto
2007-04-20 21:41 geoff
2007-04-20 23:46 ` Tim Wiess
2017-04-01  9:36 [9fans] IPV6 Bruce Ellis
2017-04-01  9:46 ` Ori Bernstein
2017-04-01  9:51   ` Bruce Ellis
2017-04-01 10:06   ` Kurt H Maier
2017-04-01 10:10     ` Bruce Ellis
2017-04-01 10:17       ` hiro
2017-04-01 16:51         ` Erik Quanstrom

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).