* [9fans] user none
@ 2000-07-08 23:13 arisawa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: arisawa @ 2000-07-08 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Hello,
I have a question.
In Plan9, we have a rule: "everyone can become none."
However user none plays important role for Internet service.
What's wrong if we replace the rule by the following ?
"Only host owner can become none."
Thanks,
Kenji Arisawa
E-mail: arisawa@aichi-u.ac.jp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] user none
@ 2000-07-09 14:55 presotto
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: presotto @ 2000-07-09 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: arisawa, 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 172 bytes --]
Off hand, I can't thing of anything that would break. In security,
less priviledge is always better. I'll change it on our syystems
and see if it does break anything.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1524 bytes --]
From: arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] user none
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 19:13:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20000708224524.281.qmail@nx.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Hello,
I have a question.
In Plan9, we have a rule: "everyone can become none."
However user none plays important role for Internet service.
What's wrong if we replace the rule by the following ?
"Only host owner can become none."
Thanks,
Kenji Arisawa
E-mail: arisawa@aichi-u.ac.jp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-07-09 14:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-07-08 23:13 [9fans] user none arisawa
2000-07-09 14:55 presotto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).