9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 versus CORBA?
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:13:29 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010926031317.68E3C1998A@mail.cse.psu.edu> (raw)

Thanks David.

I might have feared too much.   However, when we are considering the
security, we assume we may be intruded by someone with bad will someday.

In the present Plan 9, 'none' user cannot login our system from outside,
I mean other than terminals, which may be enough to prevent accidental
reading the data by such external user.

If the above statement is correct, someone can enter as 'none' user
and read hidden internal data in a future...

I wrote that thing because I've been touched Amoeba5.3 this month,
where they have different security scheme using capability which attracted
me somewhat (as far as I can understand it).  Partticularly ion the popint
 they have it per object, and have more variable security schem, or
in other words, capability.  Then, I thought we can make some change of
security scheme other than just file permission scheme...  Of course,
I don't know this may break the integrity of our system.

That is the story why I wrote the previous message.  I think I understand
your stance, and I agree with you now.

The 'noworld' user may be attractive to open a database for external use,
thanks.

Kenji

PS.  This is not serious but some kind of kidding.  Students will like to find
something interesting which is not similar to us sometime.  S/he can
append joke mail to someone, such as supervisor :-), where s/he has no
bad will though.  ^_^



             reply	other threads:[~2001-09-26  3:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-26  3:13 okamoto [this message]
2001-09-26  4:44 ` Christopher Nielsen
2001-09-26  4:50   ` David Arnold
2001-09-26  9:01   ` Boyd Roberts
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-26 13:24 jmk
2001-09-26 13:33 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-26  6:12 okamoto
2001-09-26  6:07 okamoto
2001-09-26  9:48 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-26  5:41 geoff
2001-09-26  9:47 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-26  3:18 okamoto
2001-09-26  1:48 okamoto
2001-09-26  2:44 ` david presotto
2001-09-26  1:34 presotto
2001-09-26  1:26 okamoto
2001-09-25 14:29 forsyth
2001-09-25 14:19 rob pike
2001-09-26 15:44 ` Dan Cross
2001-09-25 13:42 presotto
2001-09-25  2:07 presotto
2001-09-24 22:46 rob pike
2001-09-25  8:36 ` Andrew Simmons
2001-09-24  9:17 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2001-09-21 16:11 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2001-09-21 15:29 anothy
2001-09-21 16:03 ` Dan Cross
2001-09-21 14:54 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2001-09-21 13:37 ` Lucio De Re
2001-09-21 14:29 Sape Mullender
2001-09-21 14:26 jmk
2001-09-21 16:25 ` suspect
2001-09-21 14:04 Andrew Simmons
2001-09-21 14:25 ` andrey mirtchovski
2001-09-21 14:29   ` Ronald G Minnich
2001-09-21 15:16   ` Scott Schwartz
2001-09-21 14:28 ` Ronald G Minnich
2001-09-24  8:51   ` Andrew Simmons
2001-09-24 16:25     ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-24 22:43       ` George Michaelson
2001-09-24 22:54         ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-25  0:37           ` George Michaelson
2001-09-25  0:39             ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-25  0:55               ` George Michaelson
2001-09-25  1:00                 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-25  0:42             ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-25  0:56               ` George Michaelson
2001-09-25  1:00                 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-25  1:23                   ` Scott Schwartz
2001-09-25  2:27                     ` Dan Cross
2001-09-25  2:31                       ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-25  2:12                   ` Dan Cross
2001-09-25  2:32                     ` William Josephson
2001-10-01  9:51     ` Mike Warner
2001-09-21 14:33 ` Alexander Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010926031317.68E3C1998A@mail.cse.psu.edu \
    --to=okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).