* Re: [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes.
@ 2002-02-19 2:00 rob pike
2002-02-19 12:05 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2002-02-19 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> The funny thing about the message rob sent was that the attachment
> was labeled as being of type message/rfc822, when in fact it was not.
This is acme/mail's fault. it's got a terrible heuristic for deciding the
type of the attachment. it's hardly a heuristic at all. suggestions
welcome (in private mail to rob@plan9.bell-labs.com). what is a file
type in our world anyway?
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes. 2002-02-19 2:00 [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes rob pike @ 2002-02-19 12:05 ` Boyd Roberts 2002-02-19 12:26 ` Lucio De Re 2002-02-19 12:27 ` Matt H 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Boyd Roberts @ 2002-02-19 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans rob pike wrote: > This is acme/mail's fault. it's got a terrible heuristic for deciding the > type of the attachment. The real problem is the MINEfield (sic) that is the 4 MIME RFCs. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes. 2002-02-19 12:05 ` Boyd Roberts @ 2002-02-19 12:26 ` Lucio De Re 2002-02-19 12:35 ` Boyd Roberts 2002-02-19 12:27 ` Matt H 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Lucio De Re @ 2002-02-19 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:05:21PM +0100, Boyd Roberts wrote: > > The real problem is the MINEfield (sic) that is the 4 MIME RFCs. I don't think MIME is all _that_ bad. What's better? ++L ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes. 2002-02-19 12:26 ` Lucio De Re @ 2002-02-19 12:35 ` Boyd Roberts 2002-02-19 12:59 ` Lucio De Re 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Boyd Roberts @ 2002-02-19 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans Lucio De Re wrote: > I don't think MIME is all _that_ bad. What's better? Read the 4th RFC. It's not a question of what's better. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes. 2002-02-19 12:35 ` Boyd Roberts @ 2002-02-19 12:59 ` Lucio De Re 2002-02-19 13:02 ` Boyd Roberts 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Lucio De Re @ 2002-02-19 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:35:24PM +0100, Boyd Roberts wrote: > > Lucio De Re wrote: > > I don't think MIME is all _that_ bad. What's better? > > Read the 4th RFC. It's not a question of what's better. Oh, OK, by the third revision they could have lost all sense of purpose and/or direction. Still, where does one go from (t)here? ++L ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes. 2002-02-19 12:59 ` Lucio De Re @ 2002-02-19 13:02 ` Boyd Roberts 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Boyd Roberts @ 2002-02-19 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans Lucio De Re wrote: > Oh, OK, by the third revision they could have lost all sense of > purpose and/or direction. No, they are not revisions. You have to read _all four_. By starting with the 4th it makes the exercise a lot quicker and less painful. > Still, where does one go from (t)here? Good question. Throw it away and start again? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes. 2002-02-19 12:05 ` Boyd Roberts 2002-02-19 12:26 ` Lucio De Re @ 2002-02-19 12:27 ` Matt H 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Matt H @ 2002-02-19 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:05:21 +0100 "Boyd Roberts" <boyd@strakt.com> wrote: > rob pike wrote: > > This is acme/mail's fault. it's got a terrible heuristic for deciding > > the type of the attachment. > > The real problem is the MINEfield (sic) that is the 4 MIME RFCs. > watch out for multipart/related too, it's for HTML formatted mail but many MUA's don't seem to know about it (as I've recently find out after making my html email generator produce it. OE5 was fine with it, OE5.5+ ignores it) M ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk>]
* [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes. @ 2002-02-18 14:43 ` Ralph Corderoy 2002-02-19 1:52 ` Scott Schwartz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ralph Corderoy @ 2002-02-18 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans Hi, Jon Snader made me aware that Rob had posted -mpm-related material. I read comp.os.plan9 and didn't see the post. Google Groups has it without the attachments. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0ce9a17866461d0a3e0a61628c4149a9%40plan9.bell-labs.com&output=gplain Newsgroups: comp.os.plan9 From: rob@plan9.bell-labs.com (rob pike) Subject: Re: [9fans] [troff] Is there a macro package called -mpm ? Approved: plan9mod@bath.ac.uk Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-wnnfbneirzpjzzrtpxqsivpjsg" Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Sender: ccsis@bath.ac.uk (Icarus Sparry) Organization: Plan 9 mailing list Message-ID: <0ce9a17866461d0a3e0a61628c4149a9@plan9.bell-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:58:52 GMT Lines: 3850 Enjoy. -- My guess is the mailing list to Usenet gateway stripped off the attachments but didn't adjust the optional Lines header. My ISP's news server correctly dropped this post when it received it because it appears corrupt. Since no better version ever arrives from another peer I never see the post on comp.os.plan9. Can whoever runs the gateway confirm this supposition is correct and do something about it, e.g. delete any Lines headers since they're optional. [Moderator's notes: (1) The mailing list to Usenet gateway doesn't strip off attachments. It's only concerned with adjusting headers to suit. (2) The mailing list to Usenet gateway runs through the News system here. That is neutral as far as the Lines: header is concerned. It doesn't generate one for articles that pass through it. If one is present in the incoming article, it is left untouched. (3) The mailing list to Usenet gateway is also neutral as far as the Lines: header is concerned. If one is present in the incoming message it is passed through. If one isn't present, the s/w doesn't add one. In practice none of the above should cause problems. I don't know of of any email client or MTA that adds the Lines header to mail messages. Certainly Outlook Express can differentiate between posting a News article and a mail message. It adds a Lines: header to the former but not the latter. So News articles that are injected from the mailing list generally leave here *without* a Lines: header. Certainly that is the case for the article in question. I believe this header was added further downstream of here. There's not much I can do about that. As noted in private email I have trouble reading this article with the trn Newsreader + metamail-2.7. I get the error message: metamail: Incomplete multipart message -- unexpected EOF I suspect that this is more likely to be the source of confusion. However the contents should be easily extracted manually.] Knowing it existed on the mailing list I went to the archives. Unfortunately, http://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans re-directs you to a HTTPS connection as has previously been mentioned. And https://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans doesn't work with this Netscape which complains `Netscape and this server cannot communicate securely because they have no common encryption algorithm(s)'. It's pointless having an archive for a public list hidden behind HTTPS, and in addition demanding recent encryption algorithms. Anyone got a public archive of the list? [Moderator's note: I suspect that the web server at lists.cse.psu.edu has been configured to not accept export-grade cryptography. And this may be the source of the problem. Versions of Netscape since 4.73 have been available with full-strength cryptography from the download page at: http://www.netscape.com/download/ Earlier versions of Netscape can be brough up to full-strength cryptography by "fortifying" them. See: http://www.fortify.net/ for details.] Cheers, Ralph. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes. 2002-02-18 14:43 ` Ralph Corderoy @ 2002-02-19 1:52 ` Scott Schwartz 2002-02-22 9:58 ` Ralph Corderoy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Scott Schwartz @ 2002-02-19 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans | Jon Snader made me aware that Rob had posted -mpm-related material. I | read comp.os.plan9 and didn't see the post. Google Groups has it | without the attachments. The funny thing about the message rob sent was that the attachment was labeled as being of type message/rfc822, when in fact it was not. This confused mh, and I wouldn't be surprised if other things were confused too. | It's pointless having an archive for a public list hidden behind HTTPS, | and in addition demanding recent encryption algorithms. Anyone got a | public archive of the list? I agree, and I've complained to the people who run lists.cse.psu.edu, but to no avail. Because of that, I mirror the archives at http://bio.cse.psu.edu/~schwartz/9fans/ There are three sets of files there. The ones of the form 9fans.nnnnnn.* are from the days when Majordomo ran the list. The ones of the form nnnn-Month.* are since Mailman (spit!) took over. To work around a bug in Mailman, whereby all the "From:" lines are totally wrong, I also mirror a copy of 9fans.mbox.bz2, which is the raw submissions to the list. | I suspect that the web server at lists.cse.psu.edu has been | configured to not accept export-grade cryptography. It's configured to be retarded, that's all. See, like all broken software, Mailman relies on sending cleartext passwords across the net. So you have to hide the cleartext in cryptographic tunnels. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes. 2002-02-19 1:52 ` Scott Schwartz @ 2002-02-22 9:58 ` Ralph Corderoy 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Ralph Corderoy @ 2002-02-22 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans Hi Scott, > > Jon Snader made me aware that Rob had posted -mpm-related material. > > I read comp.os.plan9 and didn't see the post. Google Groups has it > > without the attachments. > > The funny thing about the message rob sent was that the attachment > was labeled as being of type message/rfc822, when in fact it was not. > This confused mh, and I wouldn't be surprised if other things were > confused too. Yes, you're right. That could well be what made some things drop the attachment and others, perhaps, the whole post. nmh here has problems, and I heard from Dennis Davis that trn+metamail doesn't like it either. It did reach Bakul Shah successfully on Usenet so it looks like the mail-to-Usenet gateway isn't the problem. His Path header was Path: typhoon.sonic.net!feed.news.sonic.net!unlnews.unl.edu!headwall .stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!logbridge.uoregon .edu!server3.netnews.ja.net!south.jnrs.ja.net!server2.netnews.ja.net !bath.ac.uk!ccsis I'll ask my ISP if they got any sign of it and if so, why they didn't accept. > Because of that, I mirror the archives at > http://bio.cse.psu.edu/~schwartz/9fans/ Fantastic! I've made a note for future use. I see it's also in the FAQ along with the https site. (I already got the post privately from Jon Snader.) > > I suspect that the web server at lists.cse.psu.edu has been > > configured to not accept export-grade cryptography. > > It's configured to be retarded, that's all. > > See, like all broken software, Mailman relies on sending cleartext > passwords across the net. So you have to hide the cleartext in > cryptographic tunnels. But you don't *have* to because, in Mailman's case, it makes perfectly clear the password isn't meant to give any security, just stop a very casual attack. To re-inforce this it emails you your password, in plain text, once a month. So they've no good reason to hide it for web accesses AFAICS. Thanks for the reply, Ralph. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-22 9:58 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-02-19 2:00 [9fans] Usenet Gateway and Mailing List Archive Woes rob pike 2002-02-19 12:05 ` Boyd Roberts 2002-02-19 12:26 ` Lucio De Re 2002-02-19 12:35 ` Boyd Roberts 2002-02-19 12:59 ` Lucio De Re 2002-02-19 13:02 ` Boyd Roberts 2002-02-19 12:27 ` Matt H [not found] <ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk> 2002-02-18 14:43 ` Ralph Corderoy 2002-02-19 1:52 ` Scott Schwartz 2002-02-22 9:58 ` Ralph Corderoy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).