From: Digby Tarvin <digbyt@acm.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] useful language extension, or no?
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 19:36:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207191836.TAA08412@cthulhu.dircon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <979deae73cfef9ae533f1d3d39e81f2e@plan9.bell-labs.com> from David Gordon Hogan at "Jul 19, 2002 02:22:17 pm"
> > Why not just get the compiler to generate the assembly language
> > for you.
>
> My heart wasn't into it.
>
> > It is interesting that the current compiler lets you do it (my old
> > BSD system won't swallow it) but I can't see any attempt to actually
> > execute any code on the stack.
>
> Yeah, I'm running the ast-optimiser-branch gcc by default, and it does
> use trampolines. I think it's quasi- based on gcc 3.0.
>
> Before I go on another wild goose chase, what version specifically
> do you mean by "current"?
>
Sorry - I should really have said 'more current' or 'recent'. It was
SuSE Linux 7.3, which comes with gcc-2.95.3-124
As I have since learned, a call to the nested function via a pointer
does indeed generate the jump to code on the stack....
Regards,
DigbyT
--
Digby R. S. Tarvin digbyt@acm.org
http://www.cthulhu.dircon.co.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-19 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-19 18:22 David Gordon Hogan
2002-07-19 18:36 ` Digby Tarvin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-20 5:59 forsyth
2002-07-19 18:35 forsyth
2002-07-19 18:33 David Gordon Hogan
2002-07-19 15:45 forsyth
2002-07-19 18:19 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-07-19 6:48 forsyth
2002-07-19 0:52 David Gordon Hogan
2002-07-19 12:53 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-07-19 15:41 ` Mike Haertel
2002-07-19 18:09 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-07-19 18:38 ` Scott Schwartz
2002-07-19 19:07 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-07-29 16:01 ` Ralph Corderoy
2002-07-18 19:24 David Gordon Hogan
2002-07-19 4:22 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-18 15:02 forsyth
2002-07-18 23:57 ` arisawa
2002-07-29 15:59 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-18 12:54 Richard Miller
2002-07-17 13:36 rob pike, esq.
2002-07-16 17:31 presotto
2002-07-17 8:58 ` William Josephson
2002-07-17 8:58 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-16 17:01 forsyth
2002-07-17 8:59 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-16 16:50 rob pike, esq.
2002-07-16 15:59 ` Sam
2002-07-16 17:04 ` Howard Trickey
2002-07-16 16:20 ` Sam
2002-07-16 16:08 rob pike, esq.
2002-07-16 15:31 ` Sam
2002-07-16 15:53 rob pike, esq.
2002-07-16 15:05 ` Sam
2002-07-16 21:29 ` Steve Kilbane
2002-07-16 14:12 Sam
2002-07-16 16:30 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-07-17 12:49 ` Ian Broster
2002-07-17 12:12 ` Sam
2002-07-17 13:33 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-17 16:12 ` Fariborz (Skip) Tavakkolian
2002-07-17 22:21 ` arisawa
2002-07-17 22:28 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-07-18 9:51 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-18 10:19 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-18 10:28 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-18 14:50 ` Mike Haertel
2002-07-18 14:56 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-19 5:23 ` arisawa
2002-07-18 14:21 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-18 14:55 ` Lucio De Re
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200207191836.TAA08412@cthulhu.dircon.co.uk \
--to=digbyt@acm.org \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).