From: forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] useful language extension, or no?
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 07:48:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <581d7c5933b9878dcc88b7379828b84c@caldo.demon.co.uk> (raw)
>>or does gcc also not do that, really.
>Look bellow:
with the help of the Usenix paper about it, i understand now. oh
dear! he was trying to add it subject to a particular implementation
constraint: that void* could accept a function pointer and still be
one word. he missed a way of implementing one of the techniques that
he does mention (but only in passing), and so goes to all that acrobatic
effort. Dijkstra rules! unless of course, i've missed something.
well, Dijkstra still rules.
on the other hand, what do i know about AI?
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-19 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-19 6:48 forsyth [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-20 5:59 forsyth
2002-07-19 18:35 forsyth
2002-07-19 18:33 David Gordon Hogan
2002-07-19 18:22 David Gordon Hogan
2002-07-19 18:36 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-07-19 15:45 forsyth
2002-07-19 18:19 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-07-19 0:52 David Gordon Hogan
2002-07-19 12:53 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-07-19 15:41 ` Mike Haertel
2002-07-19 18:09 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-07-19 18:38 ` Scott Schwartz
2002-07-19 19:07 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-07-29 16:01 ` Ralph Corderoy
2002-07-18 19:24 David Gordon Hogan
2002-07-19 4:22 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-18 15:02 forsyth
2002-07-18 23:57 ` arisawa
2002-07-29 15:59 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-18 12:54 Richard Miller
2002-07-17 13:36 rob pike, esq.
2002-07-16 17:31 presotto
2002-07-17 8:58 ` William Josephson
2002-07-17 8:58 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-16 17:01 forsyth
2002-07-17 8:59 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-16 16:50 rob pike, esq.
2002-07-16 15:59 ` Sam
2002-07-16 17:04 ` Howard Trickey
2002-07-16 16:20 ` Sam
2002-07-16 16:08 rob pike, esq.
2002-07-16 15:31 ` Sam
2002-07-16 15:53 rob pike, esq.
2002-07-16 15:05 ` Sam
2002-07-16 21:29 ` Steve Kilbane
2002-07-16 14:12 Sam
2002-07-16 16:30 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-07-17 12:49 ` Ian Broster
2002-07-17 12:12 ` Sam
2002-07-17 13:33 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-17 16:12 ` Fariborz (Skip) Tavakkolian
2002-07-17 22:21 ` arisawa
2002-07-17 22:28 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-07-18 9:51 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-18 10:19 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-18 10:28 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-18 14:50 ` Mike Haertel
2002-07-18 14:56 ` Lucio De Re
2002-07-19 5:23 ` arisawa
2002-07-18 14:21 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-07-18 14:55 ` Lucio De Re
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=581d7c5933b9878dcc88b7379828b84c@caldo.demon.co.uk \
--to=forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).