[9fans] Faces

[9fans] Faces

[Kris Van Hees]

Little side question: Is there an authorative source of faces files that new
entries can be submitted to for general availability?

	Kris
--
Never underestimate a Mage with:
 - the Intelligence to cast Magic Missile,
 - the Constitution to survive the first hit, and
 - the Dexterity to run fast enough to avoid being hit a second time.

Re: [9fans] Faces

[andrey mirtchovski]

Dave Presotto (presotto@plan9.bell-labs) volunteered :)


On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Kris Van Hees wrote:

> Little side question: Is there an authorative source of faces files that new
> entries can be submitted to for general availability?
>
> 	Kris
>

[9fans] faces

[Steve Simon]

You can sumbim your own patches, or, alternatively if people
want to send me their face files and a list of email addresses
that they should be associated with them I will agregate them
all into a single patch.

I am happy to resize and reformat images but if you want this
service I will use mugs rather than crop so you only get black
and white. Supply the picture as 48x48 resolution and you will
be colourful

-Steve

Re: [9fans] faces

[blstuart]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 444 bytes --]

> You can sumbim your own patches, or, alternatively if people
> want to send me their face files and a list of email addresses
> that they should be associated with them I will agregate them
> all into a single patch.

This is the one I've been using for myself for a while.  It's
kind of old, but I haven't changed in all that time :)  I'm
generally emailing from one of:

blstuart@bellsouth.net
blstuart@gmail.com

Thanks,
BLS

[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 327 bytes --]

from postmaster@vx32:
The following attachment had content that we can't
prove to be harmless.  To avoid possible automatic
execution, we changed the content headers.
The original header was:

	Content-Type: application/octet-stream
	Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=stuart.1
	Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

[-- Attachment #2.2: stuart.1.suspect --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1219 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] faces

[Akshat Kumar]

Brian! Your computer thinks your face is harmful!

another one for cat-v

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:40 PM,  <blstuart@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> from postmaster@vx32:
> The following attachment had content that we can't
> prove to be harmless.  To avoid possible automatic
> execution, we changed the content headers.
> The original header was:
>
>        Content-Type: application/octet-stream
>        Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=stuart.1
>        Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
>

Re: [9fans] faces

[blstuart]

> Brian! Your computer thinks your face is harmful!
>
> another one for cat-v
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:40 PM,  <blstuart@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> from postmaster@vx32:
>> The following attachment had content that we can't
>> prove to be harmless.  To avoid possible automatic
>> execution, we changed the content headers.
>> The original header was:
>>
>>        Content-Type: application/octet-stream
>>        Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=stuart.1
>>        Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
>>

I get that a lot...but usually from women :)

BLS

Re: [9fans] faces

[matt]

You can't prove harmlessness in people, hence the joyful collective
outcry of "all men are potential rapists". It's the halting problem of
human interaction

>>Brian! Your computer thinks your face is harmful!
>>
>>
>>
>>>The following attachment had content that we can't
>>>prove to be harmless.
>>>
>>>
>
>I get that a lot...but usually from women :)
>
>BLS
>
>
>
>

Re: [9fans] faces

[blstuart]

> You can't prove harmlessness in people, hence the joyful collective
> outcry of "all men are potential rapists". It's the halting problem of
> human interaction
>
>>>Brian! Your computer thinks your face is harmful!

I never thought of it that way, but I like that analogy.  At
least no one has written a letter to the CACM titled "Brian's
face considered harmful."  Would that lead to a fad of
aesthetic programming?

BLS

Re: [9fans] faces

[Jeff Sickel]

On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:59 PM, blstuart@bellsouth.net wrote:

> I never thought of it that way, but I like that analogy.  At
> least no one has written a letter to the CACM titled "Brian's
> face considered harmful."  Would that lead to a fad of
> aesthetic programming?

Are you taunting us?  I'm sure that at least a few on in
this group could pool their influence to get your face on
the cover of CACM.

I'm looking over "Data in Flight" or "Two Views of MapReduce
Capabilities" or "Rebuilding for Eternity" and all I'm
thinking is, Brian's floating face has replaced Charon
leading us across the River Styx so that we can make the best
of Limbo.  In doing so he helps us to pass the First Circle
and continue our voyage without Go-ing nuts.

Unfortunately I get interrupted in mid thought with a small
interlude of Cleese instructing Brian to correct his Latin
grammar...

-jas

Re: [9fans] faces

[Patrick Kelly]

On Jan 7, 2010, at 8:33 AM, matt <maht-9fans@maht0x0r.net> wrote:

> You can't prove harmlessness in people, hence the joyful collective
> outcry of "all men are potential rapists". It's the halting problem
> of human interaction

All women are potential rapists too, further complicating the problem.

>
>>> Brian! Your computer thinks your face is harmful!
>>>
>>>
>>>> The following attachment had content that we can't
>>>> prove to be harmless.
>>
>> I get that a lot...but usually from women :)
>>
>> BLS
>>
>>
>>
>
>

[9fans] faces

[Steve Simon]

A general request to all 9fans.

If you don't have a face file on sources could you generate one
(for those of us who use faces(1)).

It really helps me to have an an image to associate with the people
I receive email from.

http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Adding_your_face/index.html

Once you have updated you local system you can the submit it to
sources using patch(1)

-Steve

[9fans] faces

[rob pike, esq.]

the need for multiple resolutions of faces disappeared with the last
gnot.  the facebase should be collapsed into a single
resolution-independent hierarchy.  the faces program can handle any
resolution; just put all the resolutions in one directory and use
.dict to choose which one to show.

as for personal versions, i see two solutions.  one is to use binding,
which would be easier if the hierarchy were collapsed.  the other is
to use a pair of .dict files and search the personal one first.  in
the collapsed scheme, there is only one .dict file.  faces could
easily be modified to take an argument specifying a .dict file to use
first, and fall to the official one if no match is found.  finally,
all the names in .dict are relative.  easy change: make it understand
absolute names, which would make personal .dict files easier to write.

-rob

[9fans] faces

[bm]

Hi im trying to convert a pic.gif to a pic.1 for faces in the HEX format can't seem to figure how it is done.
thanks
brian

Re: [9fans] faces

[bm]

Christ it is now working as i made a post. Disregard this POST ..
:>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:45:50PM -0400, bm@zer0db.net wrote:
> Hi im trying to convert a pic.gif to a pic.1 for faces in the HEX format can't seem to figure how it is done.
> thanks
> brian
>

[9fans] faces

[zer0dB]

hello all,
I have ben working with plan9 for 3 days and was having a little trouble
getting the faces icon in the window im not sure even if i am converting
the jpg right.
here is what i have:

jpg -kc < pic.jpg > pic.1
iconv -c k4 pic.1

place pic.1 in /root/lib/face/48x48x4/p
and edit .dict with domain/user user/pic.1

where am i going wrong
thanks.

Re: [9fans] faces

[zer0dB]

forgot to add that all i get in the faces window is a yellow box when i
receive mail from myself.

On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 00:38, zer0dB wrote:
> hello all,
> I have ben working with plan9 for 3 days and was having a little trouble
> getting the faces icon in the window im not sure even if i am converting
> the jpg right.
> here is what i have:
>
> jpg -kc < pic.jpg > pic.1
> iconv -c k4 pic.1
>
> place pic.1 in /root/lib/face/48x48x4/p
> and edit .dict with domain/user user/pic.1
>
> where am i going wrong
> thanks.
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [9fans] faces

[boyd, rounin]

> jpg -c < pic.jpg > pic.1

should do it.

[9fans] faces

[nemo]

In http://plan9.escet.urjc.es/export/face.tgz you can
get the regular /lib/face hierarchy (as distributed) with
some other faces (from 9fans) added.

I'll update the .tgz with any other face in 48x48xN you
send to me by email.

see you(r face) soon.

Re: [9fans] faces

[Boyd Roberts]

> I'll update the .tgz with any other face in 48x48xN you
> send to me by email.

please stick to the 48x48xN format.  the problem with faces
(well one of them; don't get me started on faces) was that
it supported all these other window system specific formats
and not the core format [48x48x1 at the time].  it should
have just converted 'em only the fly, maintained a memory
cache perhaps.  xbms, random SunOS formats etc etc -- no.

Re: [9fans] faces

[nemo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]

That would be really nice.
I'd love at least to see 9fans faces.

It would be better to keep them at other place
since our network is not very reliable these days,
but if nobody else stands up, I'm willing to put a
tar ball at http://plan9.escet.urjc.es
with /lib/face after merging every  9fans face you
send to me by mail (in 48x48xX ☺).


[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1357 bytes --]

From: bwc@borf.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] faces
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:10:07 -0400
Message-ID: <20010711150932.554B6199F6@mail.cse.psu.edu>

By the by, is there a site to exchange face files?

  Brantley Coile

[9fans] faces

[bwc]

By the by, is there a site to exchange face files?

  Brantley Coile