9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Old Pharts Reminiscing?
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:10:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200311171810.hAHIAYl23385@augusta.math.psu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:45:26 MST." <2147483647.1069015526@[192.168.42.6]>

Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> writes:
> --On November 16, 2003 10:18 PM -0500 Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu> wrote:
> > More to the point, I'm not sure it's possible.  People aren't
> > interested in learning how to program elegantly
>
> I don't agree. The people who want to, or like to, learn will have this
> interest. But most of the people getting into software these days
> aren't interested in programming, engineering, or even learning for
> that matter. It's all about padding your resume.

We're quibbling over semantics here, but to be fair, when I said
``People aren't interested...'' I should have said, ``The majority of
people aren't interested...''.  There's always a small percentage of
people who want to learn how to do things well, but as the number of
programmers grows, that segment of the programming population becomes
asymptotically small.  What's more, there are people who want to learn,
``The GNU way'' or ``The BSD way'' or ``The Linux kernel way'' thinking
that's the best way, and who aren't willing to put in the effort to
learn anything above or beyond that.

> > (try telling Theo
> > Deraadt that he could program more elegantly.  For that matter, try
> > telling him he could do *anything* differently),
>
> Quit picking on Theo. I don't agree with him much of the time, either,
> but unlike the other people we're discussing here, he does engage his
> brain and work for what he thinks is right (just like we do). There's
> no dishonour in respecting your opponent.

He's one of the better examples of the problem.  There's nothing wrong
with standing up for what is right, but there *is* something wrong with
standing up for what you *think* is right without having an open mind.
Theo doesn't have an open mind.

> > What's more, we're seeing a lot of
> > people who confuse installed base and popularity with quality.
>
> Critical Thinking as a core subject through the entire education
> process? Hrmph. It's a nice dream....

Indeed it is, but the trend is endemic to the computer industry, not
just in academia.

> > Often
> > times when I tell people I use Plan 9, the first question they ask me
> > is, ``why?''
>
> I would have expected them to respond ``what?''

Well, that's the 1-1'th question.....

	- Dan C.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-11-17 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-17  3:45 Lyndon Nerenberg
2003-11-17  4:02 ` boyd, rounin
2003-11-17 13:46 ` Sam
2003-11-17 18:10 ` Dan Cross [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200311171810.hAHIAYl23385@augusta.math.psu.edu \
    --to=cross@math.psu.edu \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).