[9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Aharon Robbins]

This says a lot, rather nicely:

	http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html

Having lived through the Unix wars of the 80s and 90s, it's the same
story all over again.

(Or maybe the story never ended. Either way, the users are the ones who lost
out.)

Arnold

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Christoph Lohmann]

Greetings comrades.

On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:05:08 +0200 Aharon Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com> wrote:
> This says a lot, rather nicely:
> 
> 	http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html
> 
> Having lived through the Unix wars of the 80s and 90s, it's the same
> story all over again.

The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?


Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Rodrigo Miranda]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 812 bytes --]

Cel. Mustard
With the candlestick
In the Dining Room


Rodrigo Miranda

``The zen master hit me in the head.

I told him:

  "If you keep hitting me in the head,

     I won't be able to learn a thing!"

He hit me again.

  In

      the

             head.´´ (Rodrigo Miranda)


On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Christoph Lohmann <20h@r-36.net> wrote:

> Greetings comrades.
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:05:08 +0200 Aharon Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com>
> wrote:
> > This says a lot, rather nicely:
> >
> >       http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html
> >
> > Having lived through the Unix wars of the 80s and 90s, it's the same
> > story all over again.
>
> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Christoph Lohmann
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1365 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[erik quanstrom]

> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?

poor special effects?

- erik

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[arnold]

erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:

> > The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>
> poor special effects?
>
> - erik

The Plan 9 desktop was never aimed at the consumer market, which is
what Miguel was bemoaning for Linux.  Plan 9 was never even aimed the
broader Unix / software developer market; it was designed mainly to
please the developers (which is fine, they did great things, but let's
be honest here).

The broader point is that the Unix / Linux / Open Source "communities"
seem to be plagued with a never-ending desire to reinvent the same wheels
over again instead of moving forward. This may be part of what Rob had
in mind in his 2000 paper about systems reearch being dead.

And it may just be part of the human condition.  :-(

Arnold

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[erik quanstrom]

> erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> > > The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
> >
> > poor special effects?
> >
> > - erik
>
> The Plan 9 desktop was never aimed at the consumer market, which is
[...]

that was supposed to be a switcheroo, not a comment on plan 9 graphics
or the importance of graphics.

sorry.

- erik

Re: [9fans] new-topic: typographical interface

[Albert Skye]

erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:

> > The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>
> poor special effects?

it's just resting!
but maybe it should die

yes
no "modern GUI", &c.
(and I'm grateful for that! :)

but Plan 9 (and other software)
can be much more useful by exposition
within a *typographical interface*
i.e.,
an interface
informed by typographical imperative[1]
(to increase signal
decrease noise)
in
arranging streams
(of text/numbers/symbols/images
outputs and inputs)
using established patterns
of typographical technology
for
improving the interface/tools
between process and user

to make it
natural/immediate/effortless

[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Typographic_Style

Re: [9fans] new-topic: typographical interface

[Julius Schmidt]

the solution is
to just stop worrying and love
the bitmap font because there
are more important things
in life.
such as not inserting spurious
new lines
in mailing list posts.

On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Albert Skye wrote:

> erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
>>> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>>
>> poor special effects?
>
> it's just resting!
> but maybe it should die
>
> yes
> no "modern GUI", &c.
> (and I'm grateful for that! :)
>
> but Plan 9 (and other software)
> can be much more useful by exposition
> within a *typographical interface*
> i.e.,
> an interface
> informed by typographical imperative[1]
> (to increase signal
> decrease noise)
> in
> arranging streams
> (of text/numbers/symbols/images
> outputs and inputs)
> using established patterns
> of typographical technology
> for
> improving the interface/tools
> between process and user
>
> to make it
> natural/immediate/effortless
>
> [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Typographic_Style
>
>

Re: [9fans] new-topic: typographical interface

[Kurt H Maier]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:20:47AM -0700, Albert Skye wrote:
> erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> > > The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
> >
> > poor special effects?
>
> it's just resting!
> but maybe it should die
>
> yes
> no "modern GUI", &c.
> (and I'm grateful for that! :)
>
> but Plan 9 (and other software)
> can be much more useful by exposition
> within a *typographical interface*
> i.e.,
> an interface
> informed by typographical imperative[1]
> (to increase signal
> decrease noise)
> in
> arranging streams
> (of text/numbers/symbols/images
> outputs and inputs)
> using established patterns
> of typographical technology
> for
> improving the interface/tools
> between process and user
>
> to make it
> natural/immediate/effortless
>
> [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Typographic_Style
>

Who Ignore 4 Simultaneous

 Days Same Earth Typography.

Practicing  Evil  ONEness -

Upon Earth Of  Quadrants.

 Evil Adult Crime VS Youth.

  Supports Lie Of Integration.

  1 Educated Are Most Dumb.

  Not 1 Human Except Dead 1.

  Man Is Paired,  2 Half 4 Self.

  1 of God Is Only 1/4 Of God.

Re: [9fans] new-topic: typographical interface

[Corey Thomasson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1490 bytes --]

On Oct 18, 2012 11:44 AM, "Kurt H Maier" <khm-9@intma.in> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:20:47AM -0700, Albert Skye wrote:
> > erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
> > >
> > > poor special effects?
> >
> > it's just resting!
> > but maybe it should die
> >
> > yes
> > no "modern GUI", &c.
> > (and I'm grateful for that! :)
> >
> > but Plan 9 (and other software)
> > can be much more useful by exposition
> > within a *typographical interface*
> > i.e.,
> > an interface
> > informed by typographical imperative[1]
> > (to increase signal
> > decrease noise)
> > in
> > arranging streams
> > (of text/numbers/symbols/images
> > outputs and inputs)
> > using established patterns
> > of typographical technology
> > for
> > improving the interface/tools
> > between process and user
> >
> > to make it
> > natural/immediate/effortless
> >
> > [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Typographic_Style
> >
>
> Who Ignore 4 Simultaneous
>
>  Days Same Earth Typography.
>
> Practicing  Evil  ONEness -
>
> Upon Earth Of  Quadrants.
>
>  Evil Adult Crime VS Youth.
>
>   Supports Lie Of Integration.
>
>   1 Educated Are Most Dumb.
>
>   Not 1 Human Except Dead 1.
>
>   Man Is Paired,  2 Half 4 Self.
>
>   1 of God Is Only 1/4 Of God.
>
>
>
>

Everyday I'm slightly more convinced that you're a highly sophisticated
Markov chain.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2275 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] new-topic: typographical interface

[Kurt H Maier]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:37:57PM -0400, Corey Thomasson wrote:
>
> Everyday I'm slightly more convinced that you're a highly sophisticated
> Markov chain.

How do you feel about you're a highly sophisticated
Markov chain?

Re: [9fans] new-topic: typographical interface

[Albert Skye]

I welcome anyone interested in discussing
the nature of typographic interface
to contact me off-list

I simply see untapped potential
and I want to bring it into useful form
(by communication/cooperation more than solitude)

askye

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[tlaronde]

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:05:08PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>
> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>

Having forgotten that a market for a sensible solution is a niche
market. Only stupidity and lack of reflexion can replace the "what do
I need" with "i don't know what I need ; so what everybody has is
obviously what I do need", hence a mass market (the Panurge's sheeps).

--
        Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
                      http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Balwinder S Dheeman]

On 10/18/2012 01:35 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings comrades.
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:05:08 +0200 Aharon Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com> wrote:
>> This says a lot, rather nicely:
>>
>> 	http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html
>>
>> Having lived through the Unix wars of the 80s and 90s, it's the same
>> story all over again.
>
> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?

1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit
2) Lack of Object Oriented GUI configuration tools
3) Lack of a decent web0browser
4) Lack of a decent communication/messaging client
5) Lack of an Office Applications suite
...
...
...
z) Last, but not the least, hate towards C++ and love for the Go

--
Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman
(http://werc.homelinux.net/contact/)

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Oleksandr Iakovliev]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 861 bytes --]

On 2012-10-18 11:03 , Balwinder S Dheeman wrote:
> On 10/18/2012 01:35 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> Greetings comrades.
>>
>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:05:08 +0200 Aharon Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com>
>> wrote:
>>> This says a lot, rather nicely:
>>>
>>>     http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html
>>>
>>> Having lived through the Unix wars of the 80s and 90s, it's the same
>>> story all over again.
>>
>> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>
> 1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit
> 2) Lack of Object Oriented GUI configuration tools
> 3) Lack of a decent web0browser
> 4) Lack of a decent communication/messaging client
> 5) Lack of an Office Applications suite
> ...
> ...
> ...
> z) Last, but not the least, hate towards C++ and love for the Go
>

But that's the list of benefits, isn't? :)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1858 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Nemo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --]

that's what I thought. :)

On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Oleksandr Iakovliev <yshurik@lynxline.com> wrote:

> On 2012-10-18 11:03 , Balwinder S Dheeman wrote:
>> On 10/18/2012 01:35 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote: 
>>> Greetings comrades. 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:05:08 +0200 Aharon Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com> wrote: 
>>>> This says a lot, rather nicely: 
>>>> 
>>>>     http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html 
>>>> 
>>>> Having lived through the Unix wars of the 80s and 90s, it's the same 
>>>> story all over again. 
>>> 
>>> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop? 
>> 
>> 1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit 
>> 2) Lack of Object Oriented GUI configuration tools 
>> 3) Lack of a decent web0browser 
>> 4) Lack of a decent communication/messaging client 
>> 5) Lack of an Office Applications suite 
>> ... 
>> ... 
>> ... 
>> z) Last, but not the least, hate towards C++ and love for the Go 
>> 
> 
> But that's the list of benefits, isn't? :)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2092 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Stephen Wiley]

On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:03 AM, Balwinder S Dheeman wrote:

> On 10/18/2012 01:35 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> Greetings comrades.
>> 
>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:05:08 +0200 Aharon Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com> wrote:
>>> This says a lot, rather nicely:
>>> 
>>> 	http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html
>>> 
>>> Having lived through the Unix wars of the 80s and 90s, it's the same
>>> story all over again.
>> 
>> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
> 
> 1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit
> 2) Lack of Object Oriented GUI configuration tools
> 3) Lack of a decent web0browser
> 4) Lack of a decent communication/messaging client
> 5) Lack of an Office Applications suite
> ...
> ...
> ...
> z) Last, but not the least, hate towards C++ and love for the Go
> 
> -- 
> Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman
> (http://werc.homelinux.net/contact/)
> 

Is this another one of those weird plan9 jokes?

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Pavel Klinkovsky]

Dne čtvrtek, 18. října 2012 14:23:03 UTC+2 Oleksandr Iakovliev napsal(a):
>>       1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit
>>       ...
>     But that's the list of benefits, isn't? :)

I mostly agree except the browser.
I would appreciate a well working browser in the P9 too. ;)

Pavel

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Robert Raschke]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 489 bytes --]

A "well working browser" is an OS these days. A bit of a dilemma that.  ;-)
On Oct 18, 2012 3:25 PM, "Pavel Klinkovsky" <pavel.klinkovsky@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dne čtvrtek, 18. října 2012 14:23:03 UTC+2 Oleksandr Iakovliev napsal(a):
> >>       1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit
> >>       ...
> >     But that's the list of benefits, isn't? :)
>
> I mostly agree except the browser.
> I would appreciate a well working browser in the P9 too. ;)
>
> Pavel
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 790 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[erik quanstrom]

> A "well working browser" is an OS these days. A bit of a dilemma that.  ;-)

you overestimate how complicated an os needs to be.

- erik

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Oleksandr Iakovliev]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 249 bytes --]

On 2012-10-18 18:52 , erik quanstrom wrote:
>> A "well working browser" is an OS these days. A bit of a dilemma that.  ;-)
> you overestimate how complicated an os needs to be.
>
> - erik
>

Browsers are on the dark side - they have cookies

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 744 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[Kurt H Maier]

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 09:49:41PM +0200, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> This says a lot, rather nicely:
>
> 	http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html
>

The guy whose entire career has been spent cloning DOS and Windows
software claims that Linux sucks because it's not enough like Windows?

huge surprise

Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

[yard-ape]

>	http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html

If developmental stability was all it took to attract third party developers then why didn't FreeBSD "win the desktop" a decade ago? Or indeed Plan 9 (I suppose this is reductio)?