* Re: [9fans] lucio-
@ 2002-01-10 15:31 rob pike
2002-01-10 15:44 ` [9fans] /n/dump vs CVS -- no contest: was: lucio- Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2002-01-10 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Dump includes everything and is totally automatic. Those are its
advantages. I have used it to find old mail messages, files I've deleted,
the day on which a log file first appeared, and countless other things.
Source code control applies only to what you give it and when you
give it. For that narrow domain, it may be better, but the narrowness
makes comparing CVS to /n/dump a dull exercise.
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] /n/dump vs CVS -- no contest: was: lucio-
2002-01-10 15:31 [9fans] lucio- rob pike
@ 2002-01-10 15:44 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2002-01-10 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
rob pike wrote:
> makes comparing CVS to /n/dump a dull exercise.
Yeah, with /n/dump and bind you can track down problems of the class:
hmm, looks like libc changed yesterday, so let's load with the
day before's and see if the bug goes away ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-10 15:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-10 15:31 [9fans] lucio- rob pike
2002-01-10 15:44 ` [9fans] /n/dump vs CVS -- no contest: was: lucio- Boyd Roberts
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).