From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: ebo@sandien.com, Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] recreational programming of an evening
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:50:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1162e61003220850q465b0a84l45efe5765ec7579f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <twig.1269216125.93911@swcp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1181 bytes --]
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:02 PM, EBo <ebo@sandien.com> wrote:
> No! I'm glad that it is open source. I would not have even given it a
> second
> glance if it was not. If Linus had access to Plan 9 as a base I think
> things
> could have looked very different now, and possibly for the better.
>
I don't think that's true... he's been on this list, and he's had his say
about how he thinks about the way things work in Plan 9.
http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1233
http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1229
http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1227
http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1225
http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1224
Dave
>
>
> > I don't get your reasoning. Do you want to say we would be better off
> > if they had not released it?!
> >
> > On 3/21/10, EBo <ebo@sandien.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> no, it's just badly designed. Working with a bad design gives me a
> > >> splitting headache. I make my living doing linux but that doesn't mean
> > >> I have to worship at the altar, right?
> > >
> > > To bad plan 9 was publicly released just after Linus started working on
> > > Linux.
> > > Oh well. It's all about timing.
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2174 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-22 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-21 5:48 ron minnich
2010-03-21 8:30 ` EBo
2010-03-21 17:36 ` Stuart Morrow
2010-03-21 17:39 ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-21 21:47 ` ron minnich
2010-03-21 22:02 ` EBo
2010-03-21 22:56 ` hiro
2010-03-22 0:02 ` EBo
2010-03-22 15:50 ` David Leimbach [this message]
2010-03-22 15:57 ` andrey mirtchovski
2010-03-22 16:09 ` David Leimbach
2010-03-22 17:22 ` Chad Brown
2010-03-22 17:54 ` Chad Brown
2010-03-22 16:09 ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-21 23:19 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2010-03-21 23:54 ` EBo
2010-03-22 5:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2010-03-22 15:47 ` David Leimbach
2010-03-22 16:07 ` ron minnich
2010-03-21 17:57 ` Bakul Shah
2010-03-21 18:03 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2010-03-21 18:59 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2010-03-21 22:08 ` EBo
2010-03-21 19:37 ` Steve Simon
2010-03-21 20:41 ` Bakul Shah
2010-03-21 21:48 ` ron minnich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-17 4:37 ron minnich
2010-03-17 9:15 ` Noah Evans
2010-03-17 15:12 ` ron minnich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e1162e61003220850q465b0a84l45efe5765ec7579f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
--cc=ebo@sandien.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).