9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [9fans] upas/send -r
@ 2016-09-23 23:31 cinap_lenrek
  2016-09-24  1:19 ` Erik Quanstrom
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: cinap_lenrek @ 2016-09-23 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

i'v been getting emails send to my mailserver for random
unknown accounts which produces bounce emails for the
unsuspecting victims in the reply-to header. thinking if
upas/send should reject mails instead when called from
smtpd to avoid the backscatter. patched my local version
so upas/send will never produce a bounce when passed the
-r flag and print "mail rejected: ...." to standard error
instead. this causes smtpd to return a 5.0.0 status.

are there good reasons not to do this in general?

--
cinap



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-28  3:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-23 23:31 [9fans] upas/send -r cinap_lenrek
2016-09-24  1:19 ` Erik Quanstrom
2016-09-24  1:38   ` Jules Merit
2016-09-28  3:08     ` erik quanstrom

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).