9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [9fans] cryptsetup
@ 2013-05-27 21:15 trebol
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: trebol @ 2013-05-27 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

> did you do "ream main" first?  i have no idea what cryptsetup is.

cryptsetup is a command for manage encrypted partitions:
http://man.aiju.de/8/cryptsetup

I have repeated the installation, hoping I made a mistake adding my user to cwfs
or something.  I configured the system again, recovered my data from other computer
again, and when I was so happy starting to work in acme organizing my dirs the whole
window is filled with those errors of Tfile... expected Tdir...

Before installing Plan9 I tested the disk with linux's badblocks (write-mode test), although
I think in case of bad sectors the output would be something about I-O errors.

I don't know what to do.  I want a stable environment to work (I'm very happy with the idea of
plan9 with worm, dump and mirror) and I am used to encrypt my partitions in openbsd and linux.
I don't like the idea of have my data exposed.

Regards,
trebol.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] cryptsetup
  2013-05-27 15:42 trebol
@ 2013-05-27 20:05 ` erik quanstrom
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: erik quanstrom @ 2013-05-27 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

> I have problems in a new installed system with cryptsetup and cwfs64.
>
> checktag pc=8694 cw "/dev/fs/fscache"w'/dev/fs/fsworm" (17cc8) tag /path=Tfile/49361; expected Tdir/49358
>
> This is a fresh installation (not strange move-copy-dump-whatever) so this tags inconsistencies are worrying me,
> because that can happen in the future again with important data.
>
> Anyone has have similar problems with cryptsetup and cwfs64?
> Can I trust cryptsetup?
> Is fossil more stable than cwfs64?  I have read a lot in 9fans archive but I can't make any conclusion...
>
> Also, I don't find anything about cryptsetup outside 9front.  Is it possible to use it in the original Plan9?

did you do "ream main" first?  i have no idea what cryptsetup is.

- erik



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [9fans] cryptsetup
@ 2013-05-27 15:42 trebol
  2013-05-27 20:05 ` erik quanstrom
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: trebol @ 2013-05-27 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Hello everyone,

I have problems in a new installed system with cryptsetup and cwfs64.

checktag pc=8694 cw "/dev/fs/fscache"w'/dev/fs/fsworm" (17cc8) tag /path=Tfile/49361; expected Tdir/49358

This is a fresh installation (not strange move-copy-dump-whatever) so this tags inconsistencies are worrying me,
because that can happen in the future again with important data.

Anyone has have similar problems with cryptsetup and cwfs64?
Can I trust cryptsetup?
Is fossil more stable than cwfs64?  I have read a lot in 9fans archive but I can't make any conclusion...

Also, I don't find anything about cryptsetup outside 9front.  Is it possible to use it in the original Plan9?

Thanks in advance,
trebol.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-27 21:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-27 21:15 [9fans] cryptsetup trebol
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-27 15:42 trebol
2013-05-27 20:05 ` erik quanstrom

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).