From: unobe@cpan.org
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 15:36:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5DDAAF728759F5868AD9B01C7820DD15@smtp.pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06F2895C5373B4789EEF42BB2F0B03EF@smtp.pobox.com>
Quoth Romano <unobe@cpan.org>:
> References: <CAOw7k5hWStzajH5PmhEEyh1PFQCwiGZR7YsqB1E0+bkE9XxjRA@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: RUDP and/or others
>
> I know this is from a thread almost 8 years old on 9fans.
>
> I'm ignorant of why RUDP wasn't used in lieu of TCP for 9P
> connections. Anyone know the whys and wherefores (either technical,
> historical, or political)? I had read earlier that TCP was used in
> lieu of IL (another transport protocol developed for Plan 9) due to
> performance over long-distance connections. Did RUDP just not cut it
> in some other way for the needs of sending/receiving 9P messages?
> From the description in ip(3), it seems to have the nice behavior of
> resuming communication when a machine reboots. Is it due to the
> middle boxes/firewalls that are present in present-day networks?
>
Apparently a new line snuck in to my headers!
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tf83051f12ef60908-M69c38810259f021ac463982b
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-10 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-10 22:33 [9fans] Romano
2023-05-10 22:36 ` unobe [this message]
2023-05-10 23:51 ` [9fans] Dan Cross
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-18 22:43 [9fans] RUDP and/or others Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-18 22:48 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 0:05 ` erik quanstrom
2015-10-18 23:15 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2015-10-18 23:59 ` erik quanstrom
2015-10-19 0:09 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-19 0:35 ` erik quanstrom
2015-10-19 0:48 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-19 9:28 ` hiro
2015-10-19 20:42 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 19:36 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 20:53 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 19:31 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 20:57 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 21:17 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-10-19 9:14 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-10-19 19:29 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5DDAAF728759F5868AD9B01C7820DD15@smtp.pobox.com \
--to=unobe@cpan.org \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).