9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] sources down?
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 23:43:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d375e920905221443g73e8e66fy77fa24f20d710211@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13426df10905221431g4fabb61er19782cfd7adeef05@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:31 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In order I be of any help I need to know why the hell this happens,
>> first. I know next to nothing about how the whole system of sources
>> works, still I can help if I know how. But I do not remember anybody
>> saying: 'hey guys, we have this and this problem that causes the
>> sources are down every now and then.' Yet we see it happening.
>
>
> OK, so let's try again. How about this:
> instead of blasting a note to the known universe, 99.999% of which
> can't do anything about the situation, one could do the following:
>
> send a polite, discreet note to the people who actually run sources,
> something like this:
> "I would like to offer to help with making sources easily and readily
> available to the net. I've noticed that, at times, sources is not
> accessible. Is there some way in which I can help, by, e.g.,  running
> a replicated server?"
>
> Does this latter approach work? Yes, I have seen it work. It's why we
> have an improving USB stack.

What improving USB stack? Ah, so doing everything in secret is the way
to go? I wonder why don't we just shut down 9fans, open discussion and
collaboration is certainly not something anyone wants here anyway.

>
> Does the former approach fail? Yes. It has driven some important
> people from this list. Antisocial behavior has negative consequences.

The only antisocial behavior here (besides mine, obviously) was your
condescending and insulting answer to somebody that just asked an
honest question, and the insinuation that he wasn't ready to help,
when you just admitted "99.999%" of the people can't do anything about
the situation, in great part because people that want to help are made
to feel they are unwelcome by comments like yours.


> Whining to the list is just, well,  ... whining to the list. It ends
> up looking like an attempt to coerce people by shaming them in a
> public situation. It's what my kids used to do when they could not get
> their favorite dessert in the store. It doesn't make anyone feel any
> better. It's why so many people have Uriel in their kill files.

It makes people aware of a problem that many keep denying and
demeaning. If people can't deal with reality, there are always kill
files, as you point out.

uriel



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-22 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-22 16:34 Rudolf Sykora
2009-05-22 16:51 ` ron minnich
2009-05-22 17:12   ` erik quanstrom
2009-05-22 17:23   ` Rudolf Sykora
2009-05-22 20:52     ` dave.l
2009-05-22 21:15       ` Uriel
2009-05-22 22:13         ` Noah Evans
2009-05-22 22:18         ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-05-22 23:06           ` Rudolf Sykora
2009-05-22 23:42             ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-05-22 23:54               ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-05-23  2:28                 ` Anant Narayanan
2009-05-22 21:09     ` Uriel
2009-05-22 21:31     ` ron minnich
2009-05-22 21:43       ` Uriel [this message]
2009-05-22 22:59         ` Latchesar Ionkov
2009-05-22 21:05   ` Uriel
2009-05-22 21:13     ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-05-23  3:57     ` Skip Tavakkolian
2009-05-23 23:59 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-05-24  0:17   ` ron minnich
2009-05-24  0:28     ` Anant Narayanan
2009-05-24  0:31       ` ron minnich
2009-05-24 23:27         ` David Leimbach
2009-05-24 23:38           ` jt
2009-05-25  0:22             ` Federico G. Benavento
2009-05-25  0:28             ` David Leimbach
2009-05-25  0:44               ` Federico G. Benavento
2009-05-25  6:05                 ` andrey mirtchovski
2009-05-25  8:28                   ` Rudolf Sykora
2009-05-25 10:07                   ` Federico G. Benavento
2009-05-25 10:39                   ` cinap_lenrek
2009-05-25 18:27                     ` Steve Simon
2009-05-25 19:25                       ` J.R. Mauro
2009-05-24  1:59     ` J.R. Mauro
2009-05-24  1:26   ` Lyndon Nerenberg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-24 16:42 KADOTA Kyohei
2015-08-24 17:02 ` stevie
2015-08-24 18:04   ` KADOTA Kyohei
2008-11-02 18:51 Skip Tavakkolian
2008-11-02 19:04 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-11-02 21:35   ` geoff
2008-11-02 21:58     ` michael block
2008-11-02 23:46       ` Pietro Gagliardi
2006-11-29 21:55 james.cook
2006-11-29 22:20 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-11-29 22:30 ` geoff
2006-11-29 22:49   ` Charles Forsyth
2006-11-30  4:41   ` James Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d375e920905221443g73e8e66fy77fa24f20d710211@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=uriel99@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).