From: nigel@9fs.org
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Emacs
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:18:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75544df476470ec14498fbc9b6e8b0fd@9fs.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 41 bytes --]
I find 'nose' more useful than 'elbow'.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2151 bytes --]
From: forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Emacs
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:07:42 +0100
Message-ID: <404a8f744e2df45761206bdde489fbef@caldo.demon.co.uk>
>>>to research the reasoning and theory behind plan9 and acme? I realize it
> >>is rather different style from traditional UNIX editing as well as the
>>>Emacs style of editing, ...
>>>
>> i'd hope so after all this time. [i said]
>>
>read as "I understand it is easy to be preconditioned
>by confident utilization of UNIX/Emacs style editing
>over long periods of time, but, there is no reason to
>dismiss a new environment without first learning how
no, i meant today must be roughly 20 years later, surely,
if not more. i'd hope at least the style and ideally the substance
might have changed a bit in these areas. i realise that
some older things turn out to be the best achievable,
even in computing, and some newer things are
worse than their predecessors.
in this case, however, i can't help thinking that the elapsed time
should provide some opportunity for interesting improvement.
control-meta-shift-elbow!
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-12 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-12 9:18 nigel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-12 17:56 anothy
2002-06-12 9:07 forsyth
2002-06-12 10:08 ` John Murdie
2002-06-13 9:29 ` Don
2002-06-12 7:49 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-06-11 10:08 forsyth
2002-06-12 8:54 ` Don
2002-06-10 10:31 nigel
2002-06-10 10:31 nigel
2002-06-10 10:21 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-06-10 10:10 forsyth
2002-06-07 9:35 nigel
2002-06-10 9:53 ` Blake McBride
2002-06-10 17:00 ` Steve Kilbane
2002-06-11 9:08 ` Don
2002-06-11 18:55 ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2002-06-12 8:54 ` Don
2002-06-11 9:09 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-06-10 10:02 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-06-10 14:10 ` Blake McBride
2002-06-10 17:13 ` Quinn Dunkan
2002-06-10 18:15 ` Fariborz Tavakkolian
2002-06-10 20:43 ` FJ Ballesteros
2002-06-11 9:08 ` Don
2002-06-11 9:09 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-06-12 8:54 ` Joel Salomon
2002-06-10 15:47 ` James A. Robinson
2002-06-11 15:27 ` Blake McBride
2002-06-11 17:36 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-06-11 17:44 ` James A. Robinson
2002-06-11 20:43 ` Digby Tarvin
2002-06-07 9:06 Blake McBride
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75544df476470ec14498fbc9b6e8b0fd@9fs.org \
--to=nigel@9fs.org \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).