From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Interested in improving networking in Plan 9
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:51:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91fc78b80acbea93abcb30ec83c88769@quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ED8958B0-92EB-4D51-B007-1D6FCBB74134@gmail.com>
> I think there are a few issues beyond will it scale - of course with
> 128k nodes scaling is a baseline prereq for us. On BG we have a
> segmented network to deal with -- but it's likely you'll want some
> form of hierarchy regardless.
>
> I have done much with dynamic service registry using DNS in plan 9 -
> maybe it's easy and just not well documented.
i'm sure there are.
could you explan why you're focused on dns?
a more natural way to use plan 9 would be to use
ndb and cs directly. wouldn't it?
by the way, ndb/cs is already a program that
replaces a static file. why couldn't you use
it to do these interesting lookups? it already
has some specialized knowledge of protocols.
it seems like the place for these things.
i've probablly just given away my vast ignorance.
please set me straight. :-)
- erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-31 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-30 7:21 Vinu Rajashekhar
2009-08-30 14:21 ` ron minnich
2009-08-30 16:19 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-08-30 17:07 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-30 17:40 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2009-08-30 17:53 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] ` <c81a07350908300842w3df8321aidf55096b65eb9b77@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-30 18:17 ` ron minnich
2009-08-30 18:35 ` ron minnich
2009-08-31 3:34 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-31 12:45 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-08-31 12:51 ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2009-08-31 12:59 ` Vinu Rajashekhar
2009-08-31 13:05 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-31 13:48 ` Anthony Sorace
2009-08-31 14:51 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-08-31 15:03 ` Vinu Rajashekhar
2009-08-31 13:42 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-08-31 14:04 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-31 14:25 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-08-31 14:36 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-31 14:57 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-08-31 15:52 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-31 16:12 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-08-31 14:55 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-08-31 15:09 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-08-31 15:56 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-31 16:16 ` Bakul Shah
2009-08-31 16:33 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-09-02 16:50 ` Bakul Shah
2009-09-02 17:10 ` Robert Raschke
2009-09-03 11:21 ` matt
2009-09-03 12:50 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-03 16:13 ` Anthony Sorace
2009-09-03 16:29 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-03 16:34 ` Robert Raschke
2009-09-03 21:50 ` Daniel Lyons
2009-09-03 19:08 ` Steve Simon
2009-08-31 17:09 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-08-31 17:20 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-31 17:32 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-08-31 18:00 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-31 4:17 ` Federico G. Benavento
2009-08-31 4:53 ` Vinu Rajashekhar
2009-08-30 17:22 erik quanstrom
2009-08-30 17:36 ` Vinu Rajashekhar
2009-08-30 17:56 ` erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91fc78b80acbea93abcb30ec83c88769@quanstro.net \
--to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).