From: Jacob Todd <jaketodd422@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] crazy idea - drawterm in javascript?
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 19:40:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimdz9VAM5oEuoTYHXqPFJ7=Gv+u5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105171549.34288.errno@cox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2391 bytes --]
Writing/porting web stuff to plan 9 will be hard. Writing something that
accesses plan 9 from the web will be less hard.
On May 17, 2011 6:53 PM, "errno" <errno@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 10:31:32 AM John Floren wrote:
>> they want to let you connect to your Plan 9 system from a web
>> browser, because you can find a Javascript-supporting web browser
>> anywhere (except Plan 9) these days.
>>
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 12:00:15 AM Adrian Tritschler wrote:
>> Serve it over http and access your CPU server from anywhere
>> that's got a web browser.
>>
>
> Is it really all that often when a Plan 9 user is in the precarious
> situation of needing to access his plan9 system from some
> other person's/party's pc or laptop?
>
> Is this for when you glide into a coffee shop and forget your
> laptop or something? "Hey, Mr.... may I borrow your laptop's
> web browser for a sec... I really need to hack some code on
> my plan9 system."
>
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 12:04:02 PM Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
>> that's not the point though; the point is to have something
>> that runs natively in the browser.
>>
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 10:31:32 AM John Floren wrote:
>> Writing a drawterm replacement in Javascript is not
>> going to "downgrade" Plan 9.
>>
>
> Ok, who slipped me the Cr@zy Pills? Just a couple weeks ago,
> javascript and web technologies were THE DEVIL INCARNATE...
> but suddenly, here's something we can all get behind...
> javascript + html5 + browsers and other web standards
> are now OK[tm]?
>
> So.... it's cool to have "the 9" running 'native' in a browser
> (via javascript!)... but to have "the web" running 'native' in
> Plan 9... is stark full of controversy, fear, uncertainty and
> doubt?
>
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:18:45 AM erik quanstrom wrote:
>> one would then be able to write applications for non-plan 9
>> users in plan 9.
>>
>
> I realize I'm being unimaginative, but I'm having a very difficult
> time conceiving what sort of plan 9 application could possibly
> be appealing to non-plan 9 users.
>
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:18:45 AM erik quanstrom wrote:
>> it would be nice to have emulated environment that's more
>> portable than 9vx and not tied to 32-bit x86.
>>
>
> Well now this at least actually makes some modicum of sense
> to me.
>
> The web is the key.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2990 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-17 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 7:00 Adrian Tritschler
2011-05-17 7:38 ` erik quanstrom
2011-05-17 15:02 ` Russ Cox
2011-05-17 13:59 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2011-05-17 17:53 ` Joseph Stewart
2011-05-17 17:57 ` John Floren
2011-05-17 18:04 ` Joseph Stewart
2011-05-17 18:16 ` Jason Dreisbach
2011-05-17 18:00 ` Russ Cox
2011-05-17 15:08 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-05-17 17:23 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-05-17 17:31 ` John Floren
2011-05-17 18:18 ` erik quanstrom
2011-05-17 18:46 ` a z
2011-05-17 19:04 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-05-17 23:05 ` David Leimbach
2011-05-18 9:15 ` dorin bumbu
2011-05-18 9:40 ` a z
2011-05-17 22:49 ` errno
2011-05-17 23:40 ` Jacob Todd [this message]
2011-05-17 23:58 ` errno
2011-05-18 0:18 ` David Leimbach
2011-05-18 1:02 ` errno
2011-05-18 8:33 ` Balwinder S Dheeman
2011-05-18 9:49 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-05-18 12:24 ` blstuart
2011-05-18 14:23 ` David Leimbach
2011-05-18 15:37 ` Balwinder S Dheeman
2011-05-18 15:46 ` erik quanstrom
2011-05-20 12:41 ` Balwinder S Dheeman
2011-05-19 1:04 ` blstuart
2011-05-18 15:58 ` ComeauAt9Fans@gmail.com
2011-05-17 18:16 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-05-18 6:31 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-05-18 7:28 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-05-18 7:30 ` Peter A. Cejchan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTimdz9VAM5oEuoTYHXqPFJ7=Gv+u5w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jaketodd422@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).