* [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
@ 2017-05-05 13:25 Dave MacFarlane
2017-05-05 19:43 ` Giacomo Tesio
2017-05-05 23:50 ` Jules Merit
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave MacFarlane @ 2017-05-05 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front mailing list; +Cc: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>
> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>
> sl
>
I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
and designed) code.
I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
- Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-05 13:25 [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions) Dave MacFarlane
@ 2017-05-05 19:43 ` Giacomo Tesio
2017-05-06 8:18 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2017-05-05 23:50 ` Jules Merit
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Giacomo Tesio @ 2017-05-05 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front; +Cc: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting.
Giacomo
2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>>
>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>>
>> sl
>>
>
> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
> and designed) code.
>
> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>
> - Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-05 13:25 [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions) Dave MacFarlane
2017-05-05 19:43 ` Giacomo Tesio
@ 2017-05-05 23:50 ` Jules Merit
2017-05-06 1:25 ` Skip Tavakkolian
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jules Merit @ 2017-05-05 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 818 bytes --]
May I suggest "pxemain"?
Grow the runtime. 'size /bin/false'
On May 5, 2017 6:28 AM, "Dave MacFarlane" <driusan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
> >
> > sl
> >
>
> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
> and designed) code.
>
> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>
> - Dave
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1252 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-05 23:50 ` Jules Merit
@ 2017-05-06 1:25 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2017-05-06 1:32 ` Bruce Ellis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Skip Tavakkolian @ 2017-05-06 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1000 bytes --]
آقای Mark V. Shaney شما ما را خسته کردید.
On Fri, May 5, 2017, 4:51 PM Jules Merit <jules.merit.eurocorp.us@gmail.com>
wrote:
> May I suggest "pxemain"?
> Grow the runtime. 'size /bin/false'
>
> On May 5, 2017 6:28 AM, "Dave MacFarlane" <driusan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>> >
>> > sl
>> >
>>
>> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
>> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
>> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
>> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
>> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
>> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
>> and designed) code.
>>
>> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>>
>> - Dave
>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1691 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-06 1:25 ` Skip Tavakkolian
@ 2017-05-06 1:32 ` Bruce Ellis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ellis @ 2017-05-06 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1165 bytes --]
I agree. Thank you Google translate.
brucee
On 6 May 2017 at 11:25, Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> wrote:
> آقای Mark V. Shaney شما ما را خسته کردید.
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017, 4:51 PM Jules Merit <jules.merit.eurocorp.us@
> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> May I suggest "pxemain"?
>> Grow the runtime. 'size /bin/false'
>>
>> On May 5, 2017 6:28 AM, "Dave MacFarlane" <driusan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>>> >
>>> > sl
>>> >
>>>
>>> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
>>> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
>>> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
>>> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
>>> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
>>> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
>>> and designed) code.
>>>
>>> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>>>
>>> - Dave
>>>
>>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2209 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-05 19:43 ` Giacomo Tesio
@ 2017-05-06 8:18 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2017-05-06 10:12 ` Giacomo Tesio
2017-05-06 13:12 ` Peter A. Cejchan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Francisco J Ballesteros @ 2017-05-06 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs; +Cc: 9front
I don’t now if clive or not,
but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like environment
but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new “HW”.
I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another attempt; ideas are welcome :-)
> On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
>
> You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting.
>
>
> Giacomo
>
> 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com>:
>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>>>
>>> sl
>>>
>>
>> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
>> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
>> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
>> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
>> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
>> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
>> and designed) code.
>>
>> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>>
>> - Dave
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-06 8:18 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
@ 2017-05-06 10:12 ` Giacomo Tesio
2017-05-06 13:12 ` Peter A. Cejchan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Giacomo Tesio @ 2017-05-06 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs; +Cc: 9front
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 595 bytes --]
Il 06/Mag/2017 10:22, "Francisco J Ballesteros" <nemo@lsub.org> ha scritto:
considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new
“HW”.
I'm afraid it's what they are trying to achieve with webassebly.
And in a way Inferno was doing the same, wasn't it.
I agree that in a network, several different os should be able to work
together seemlessy.
But despite my efforts in Jehanne I don't think the key to achieve this is
a os, nor a language. IMHO the key is a better general purpose protocol, as
simple as 9p but able to replace http.
Giacomo
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1161 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-06 8:18 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2017-05-06 10:12 ` Giacomo Tesio
@ 2017-05-06 13:12 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2017-05-06 13:17 ` Fran. J Ballesteros
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter A. Cejchan @ 2017-05-06 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1463 bytes --]
"clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ???
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
wrote:
> I don’t now if clive or not,
>
> but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like
> environment
> but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as
> the new “HW”.
>
> I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another
> attempt; ideas are welcome :-)
>
>
> > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
> >
> > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting.
> >
> >
> > Giacomo
> >
> > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com>:
> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
> >>>
> >>> sl
> >>>
> >>
> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
> >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
> >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
> >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
> >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
> >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
> >> and designed) code.
> >>
> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
> >>
> >> - Dave
> >
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2260 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-06 13:12 ` Peter A. Cejchan
@ 2017-05-06 13:17 ` Fran. J Ballesteros
2017-05-06 13:18 ` Fran. J Ballesteros
2017-05-06 15:37 ` Peter A. Cejchan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Fran. J Ballesteros @ 2017-05-06 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1618 bytes --]
not yet.
sorry for the "was".
> El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan <tyapca7@gmail.com> escribió:
>
> "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ???
>
>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org> wrote:
>> I don’t now if clive or not,
>>
>> but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like environment
>> but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new “HW”.
>>
>> I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another attempt; ideas are welcome :-)
>>
>>
>> > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
>> >
>> > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting.
>> >
>> >
>> > Giacomo
>> >
>> > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com>:
>> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>> >>>
>> >>> sl
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
>> >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
>> >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
>> >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
>> >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
>> >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
>> >> and designed) code.
>> >>
>> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>> >>
>> >> - Dave
>> >
>>
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2609 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-06 13:17 ` Fran. J Ballesteros
@ 2017-05-06 13:18 ` Fran. J Ballesteros
2017-05-06 15:37 ` Peter A. Cejchan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Fran. J Ballesteros @ 2017-05-06 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1839 bytes --]
in fact all my machines are using zx now, a 9p descendant. I'm quite happy with it.
> El 6 may 2017, a las 15:17, Fran. J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org> escribió:
>
> not yet.
> sorry for the "was".
>
>> El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan <tyapca7@gmail.com> escribió:
>>
>> "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ???
>>
>>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org> wrote:
>>> I don’t now if clive or not,
>>>
>>> but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like environment
>>> but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new “HW”.
>>>
>>> I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another attempt; ideas are welcome :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Giacomo
>>> >
>>> > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com>:
>>> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> sl
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
>>> >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
>>> >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
>>> >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
>>> >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
>>> >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
>>> >> and designed) code.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>>> >>
>>> >> - Dave
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2988 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
2017-05-06 13:17 ` Fran. J Ballesteros
2017-05-06 13:18 ` Fran. J Ballesteros
@ 2017-05-06 15:37 ` Peter A. Cejchan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter A. Cejchan @ 2017-05-06 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1735 bytes --]
Cross fingers...
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Fran. J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org> wrote:
> not yet.
> sorry for the "was".
>
> El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan <tyapca7@gmail.com> escribió:
>
> "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ???
>
> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I don’t now if clive or not,
>>
>> but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like
>> environment
>> but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as
>> the new “HW”.
>>
>> I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another
>> attempt; ideas are welcome :-)
>>
>>
>> > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
>> >
>> > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting.
>> >
>> >
>> > Giacomo
>> >
>> > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com>:
>> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>> >>>
>> >>> sl
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
>> >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
>> >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
>> >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
>> >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
>> >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
>> >> and designed) code.
>> >>
>> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>> >>
>> >> - Dave
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3073 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-06 15:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-05 13:25 [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions) Dave MacFarlane
2017-05-05 19:43 ` Giacomo Tesio
2017-05-06 8:18 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2017-05-06 10:12 ` Giacomo Tesio
2017-05-06 13:12 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2017-05-06 13:17 ` Fran. J Ballesteros
2017-05-06 13:18 ` Fran. J Ballesteros
2017-05-06 15:37 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2017-05-05 23:50 ` Jules Merit
2017-05-06 1:25 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2017-05-06 1:32 ` Bruce Ellis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).