From: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] cpu server
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:20:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0402071917250.22026-100000@einstein.ssz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b89a88f3506ffdb5adafcb395df34efc@terzarima.net>
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> >>That is correct Bruce. A single P9 box is brain dead, it is unable to
> >>demonstrate -any- of its advantages over a traditional OS.
>
> actually, i don't think that's quite right, if you look at the construction
> of many of the services, for instance.
Yada yada yada, backpedaling.
P9 -is- a *distributed operating system*. That was it's purpose. Using it
for anything else, while possible, isn't using its strengths. It's simply
trying to shoehorn it in to the same old same old. That doesn't do P9 the
justice it deserves. It does of course explain why the OS has not grown
with the potential it possess. If you don't see, you don't see.
You're of course welcome to your own opinion.
-- --
Open Forge, LLC 24/365 Onsite Support for PCs, Networks, & Game Consoles
512-695-4126 (Austin, Tx.) help@open-forge.com irc.open-forge.com
Hangar 18 Open Source Distributed Computing Using Plan 9 & Linux
512-451-7087 http://open-forge.org/hangar18 irc.open-forge.org
James Choate 512-451-7087 ravage@ssz.com jchoate@open-forge.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-08 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-07 0:24 vdharani
2004-02-06 22:50 ` Jim Choate
2004-02-07 3:41 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-02-07 14:48 ` Jim Choate
2004-02-07 15:21 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-02-07 16:05 ` Jim Choate
2004-02-07 19:54 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-02-07 22:26 ` a
2004-02-07 23:16 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-09 17:47 ` rog
2004-02-09 18:19 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-09 18:43 ` rog
2004-02-09 18:49 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-09 18:49 ` rog
2004-02-09 18:50 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-09 19:32 ` 9nut
2004-02-09 18:44 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-10 1:38 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-02-10 1:40 ` David Presotto
2004-02-10 1:50 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-10 1:11 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-10 3:03 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2004-02-10 5:00 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-11 3:14 ` Jack Johnson
2004-02-08 1:04 ` Taj Khattra
2004-02-08 1:20 ` Jim Choate [this message]
2004-02-08 2:56 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-02-08 2:40 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-02-07 8:18 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-07 11:12 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-02-07 11:33 ` a
2004-02-07 13:30 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-07 13:38 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-07 14:51 ` Jim Choate
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-28 3:09 [9fans] CPU Server Joshua Wood
2007-12-22 23:12 "Rodolfo \"kix\" Garcia"
2007-12-22 23:15 ` Iruata Souza
2007-12-23 3:13 ` John Soros
2007-12-23 3:35 ` erik quanstrom
2007-12-27 16:16 ` "Rodolfo \"kix\" Garcia"
2007-08-15 22:13 Rodolfo (kix)
2007-08-16 1:26 ` geoff
2007-08-16 13:18 ` rob
2007-08-16 13:29 ` erik quanstrom
1998-07-13 15:46 Franklin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0402071917250.22026-100000@einstein.ssz.com \
--to=ravage@einstein.ssz.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).